Preview

Was it Justified

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
759 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was it Justified
Was the U.S. Justified in Going to War With Mexico? (Yes)

The United States of America in the 1800’s was a rapidly growing country. Many people moved west for religious freedom while others were strong believers in Manifest Destiny. In order to occupy land, settlers had to find land that wasn’t already occupied. Since most of the west was a part of Mexico, this was not easy to do. Luckily, Mexicans also wanted settlers in their western lands because that area was not developed. Mexico invited Americans to settle in their land. However, both countries had many differences. It did not take long before the United States and Mexico went to war. The United States was justified in going to war because Mexico had shed American blood on American soil, Texas (a land that many Mexicans still considered theirs) was an independent republic and had the right to govern itself, and Texas was trying to become part of the United States, which means that the United States had a right to be involved, too. Mexico had encouraged Americans to settle in the province of Texas, which was part of Mexico at the time. After the Texans and Mexicans fought, Texas won its independence from Mexico in 1836. Now, in 1846, America sent a troop of men lead by General Zachary Taylor to the Texan border to make sure the Mexicans weren’t attempting to attack Texas (Doc B). This angered the Mexicans since it made it seem like Texas was now allied with America. The dispute that followed led to the death of sixteen Americans. Also, the Mexicans chose to believe that the arrival of General Zachary Taylor was an outright attack, which lead to the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma (Doc C). This shows that Mexico had taken the first step of fighting the United States. Eventually, the Mexicans were forced to surrender. As to which side fired first, this cannot be determined. In one letter to Congress, James Polk stated, “We have tried every effort at reconciliation. The cup of forbearance had

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after gaining independence, Texas elected Sam Houston as their first president and voted for annexation. Andrew Jackson decided to wait a few years before adding Texas to the United States. Texas, being a slave state would upset the balance of slave states. He also knew that the addition could spark a war with Mexico. The annexation of Texas immediately caused tensions between the Mexican government and the United States. With the desire to acquire California and New Mexico, President James Polk sent troops to disputed territory to further upset the Mexican government. The American troops were quickly attacked, and the Mexican- American War was ignited. General Zachary Taylor led his men to victory at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Mexico justified to go to war with the United States? This essay argues the US was justified because Mexico invaded US territory, Mexician territories needed a new government, and Mexican territories didn´t respect the US reconciliation. Mexico invaded the United States terrirory. The quote that supports this is,”Mexico has passed the boundry of the United States… has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. ”(Polk).…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was not easily negotiated, for the disputes which underlay it went back to the question of Texas. Following the successful revolt of the Texans, including Mexicans who lived north of the Rio Grande, against the dictator Santa Ana, the Mexican government did not reconcile itself to the loss of this vast territory. Instead, it plotted and planned to recover Texas, by military force if necessary. The accession of Texas to the Union in 2 March 1845 poisoned relations between the United States and Mexico and set the stage for the Mexican-American War.…

    • 2118 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican American War DBQ

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A huge contributor to this war was the Lone Star Republic of Texas. Mexico refused to recognize the annexation of Texas. Mexico even stated that if the United States were to admit Texas to the Union it would be considered an act of war. The fact that Mexico refused to recognize the annexation of Texas, and threatened to go to war over it shows one of the justifications that the war was neither unjustified nor unprovoked.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American War Dbq

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page

    The United States was unjustified when going to war with Mexico for multiple reasons. One of the biggest reasons was the expansion of a slavery state. Texas is very large and great for growing cotton, so if the U.S. annexed Texas, a very large slave state would be added. The second reason was that James Polk provoked the war. He was also a big believer in Manifest Destiny. This meant that he wanted to expand the land of the U.S. , and His motto was “54 40 or fight” which meant expanding the U.S. up to the northern boundary of the Oregon territory. If this goal was not achieved, they would go to war to get it.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican American war started in 1846, ten years after Texas won its independence from Mexico. In 1844 Texas was annexed, upon their request, to the United States. This caused trouble with the Mexican government because they believed that the southern border of Texas was along the Del Norte river, while the American government believed that the border was the Rio Grande river. When U.S. President James Polk sent troops into this disputed territory, Mexico attacked, killing sixteen American soldiers, and starting the Mexican-American war. The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because, Texas was independent from Mexico, Mexico engaged in violence first, and Mexico was not governing Texas well.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was not that long ago the United States went to war with their neighboring country, Mexico. With James K. Polk being elected president of the United States in 1844, things were about to change for Mexico. A war was about to emerge that would make the United States a bigger and better country. Without the economic growth, Mexico lacked a strong Army to defeat the American Army and Navy to keep their land. Mexico would not give up their land without a fight. People believe that the United States had no right to start a war with Mexico and take a huge part of their land. With that being said, President Polk had other plans up his sleeve, a plan to take Mexican land from Texas to California.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexico Dbq Analysis

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first reason the United States was justified in going to war with Mexico is because they were in desperate need of land. The U.S’s population was growing rapidly due to its increase in birth rate and immigration (Document E). This growing population meant there wasn't enough land for everyone to live comfortably, which meant having to move west. The U.S would not just take land if they did not intend to put it to good use. They're moving their people into Texas because they need more space, which is a good reason why they had to move down…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican-American war stared in 1821 after Mexico won its independence from Spain, thus allowing American settlers to move into the newly unoccupied territory. The Victorians of the war, were the Americans. After the war came to an end, Mexico signed the treaty of Guadalupe hidalgo. In the treaty Mexico agreed to give 500,000mi to the U.S., while the united states paid Mexico $15 million. There are many different point of views towards the Mexican-American war. The United states was not justified by going to war with Mexico because, they fought for what belonged to Mexico in the first place. And they used the belief of Manifest Destiny to overspread our country ignorantly.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Texan independence and Santa Anna's actions are key reasons for the cause of the Mexican-American War. Texans and Americans knew that the Mexican government did not have the power to stop Texas from becoming independent. Rather than letting Mexican and Texan officials talk everything out they forced the captured leader to sign a document without the consent of the Mexican people. This action was undemocratic and hypocritical of Texas and the United States. Yes, Texas was justified running its own local government because Mexico just didn't have the power to govern Texas. However, they could have made better and more fair choices that could have benefitted both parties rather than benefitting only one and making the other suffer. Mexico refused to pay $2 million in damages from the Texas's war for Independence. They didn't want to pay because they never agreed to the treaty, to begin with, and…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    [Mexico and america went to war for many reasons. To start the tensions America annexed texas when Mexico still thought that it was still theirs. To add onto that, America and Mexico dissagered on where Texas ended. Mexico encested that it ended at the Nueces River, while America sad that Texas said it ended at the Rio Grande. What I think really caused the war was that 16 American soldiers were killed just north of the Rio Grande.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was not in the best interest of Mexico to declare war on America. In another perspective, some ma say that America was not justified in going to war with Mexico because America just wanted a reason to take California. This point of view makes sense because James Polk was a believer of Manifest Destiny and said that he had an eye on California. However, that is how countries and land for the taking work, they get bought, stolen, or…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican-American war was a border dispute due to Texas. Texas had declared independence from Mexico since 1836. Mexico thought the boundary line was “...the Sabine River, which separated Louisiana and Texas (Pg.6 Johannsen).” The U.S claimed the line was “...the Rio Grande, the "traditional" line claimed in the 1803 treaty with France, which suggested that Texas was a part of the Louisiana Purchase, and confirmed by John Quincy Adams in his 1819 negotiations with Spain (Pg.6 Johannsen).” The purpose of the war was to decide how the annexation of Texas was going to happen by deciding where the boundary line should be.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics