I. Compare and contrast Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois by completing the information for each man on the chart below using p.631-633 in Out of Many and the Internet. You will need this background information in order to better understand excerpts from the works of these men.…
No person was better than another based off of skin color. His institute was mainly focused on skills like mathematics and industry. He encouraged both the African American and white race to be educated and successful. Dubois only sought the Africans American to be educated with sciences and arts. Dubois believe firmly in excellence and working hard no matter what career. He thought that Washington’s teachings of the industry was bad because it immediately made them of the lower class. Which is dumb because he said that he wanted everyone to work hard at their career. So it doesn't matter what job you have just as long as you work hard at it and are respectful. Washington was right about being respectful to all races and everyone.…
In post-reconstruction America, many Black writers, ministers, teachers and others eloquently argued on behalf of freedom and justice for Black Americans, advocating various strategies for achieving racial and economic equality. Two such leaders who helped shape the political discourse were Ida B. Wells and Booker T. Washington. Urging politically divergent approaches, they both wanted African American people and men in particular, to be valued and respected by the white south. However, they differed significantly in the means by which they believed such change would come about. Ida B. Wells told the truth in a way that made many whites uncomfortable, addressing lynching and other racially motivated atrocities directly and proposing that African Americans collectively leverage economic power through strikes and boycotts, and individually protect themselves from lynches with weapons. In contrast, Washington was more conciliatory, appealing to whites to give African Americans the opportunity to prove their technical capacity and participate alongside whites as legitimate economic partners. While the “gradualist” gained unprecedented access to formal political power through his white benefactors, I believe Ida B. Wells’ argument that African Americans stop conceding power to whites was more persuasive in advancing racial equality for African Americans in post-reconstruction America.…
Barnett criticized that Washington; one of the most noted of their own race should join with the enemies(Doc H). Such attitudes from Washington could truly be appreciated by Southern whites who in no way would want to be equivalent to a Negro. Although both men approached the topic differently, the advancement of civil rights would not be as far along today if it were not for both simultaneous views. Each needed the other to achieve his agenda. However, the most experienced in dealing with the sensitivity of the prejudices was Washington. He seemingly knew what buttons to push and how far he could push them. Curiously, the year Washington gave his Atlanta Compromise Address in 1895, the number of blacks lynched dropped from 170 the previous year to just above 120. Du Bois approach of ceaseless agitation, unfailing exposure of dishonesty and wrong was not ready for the time where Washington is more rational in his gradual approach. But both men gradually helped Blacks at the time gain rights, and made the stepping stones for the Civil Rights…
In chapter three of the Souls of Black Folks, W.E.B. Du Bois argues that although Booker T. Washington has took many stands in opposition of the injustices done to black people, his “Atlanta Compromise” speech has done more to hinder the black community than help it. Washington believed that reconstruction failed because African Americans were offered too much too soon, so he believed that industrial education should be stressed to his pupils rather than intellectual education. In his speech he advocated that they should be starting at the bottom rather than at the top and that if they are patient, basic human rights such as being able to vote may follow some time in the future. Washington asked that black people give up three things: political power, insistence on civil rights and higher education of Negro youth. Du Bois argues against this, saying that, “the way for a people to gain their reasonable rights is not by voluntarily throwing them away and insisting that they do not want them” (Du Bois, pg. 39). I agree with Du bois in this because if people do not stand up for their rights and make it known that they are not going to budge in their pursuit of them, then there will be no proper motivation for their current state to be actively changed. Without this constant insistence, people may never truly realize that “color discrimination is barbarism” (Bu bois, pg. 39). Du Bois states that in the years after Washington made his speech there had occurred “the disfranchisement of the Negro, the legal creation of a distinct status of civil inferiority of the Negro and the steady withdrawal of aid from institutions for the higher training of the Negro” (Du Bois, pg. 37). Although these occurrences were not directly caused by Washington’s speech, his propaganda was a catalyst for them.…
Du Bois. Unlike Washington, Du, Bois, freely attended school with whites and attend Fisk University. He was a fervent believer that it was important to attain a good education as he said: “Ignorance is a cure for nothing.” It was during this time that he started to take a strong look at the deep troubles of American racism. On the troubling effects of racism on the African America community he wrote in his, in his book, The Souls of Black Folk, “One ever feels his twoness, -- an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body, whose strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder.” Du Bois entered Harvard University and in 1895 he became the first African-American to earn a Ph.D. from Harvard University. And it was while he was working as a professor at Atlanta University, W.E.B. Du Bois very publicly opposed Booker T. Washington's "Atlanta Compromise," in which Washington had said that vocational education for blacks was more valuable to them than social advantages like higher education or political office. Du Bois strongly criticized Washington for not demanding equality for African Americans, as were granted to them by the 14th Amendment. He believed that the time for acceptance was now as he said in his book, The Souls of Black Folk, “Now is the accepted time, not tomorrow, not some more convenient season. It is today that our best work can be done and not some future day or future year. It is today that we fit ourselves for the greater usefulness of tomorrow. Today is the seed time, now are the hours of work, and tomorrow comes to the harvest and the playtime.” He also disagreed with Washington’s views on education. In stark contrast to…
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois each had individual approaches to dealing with poverty and discrimination issues of African-Americans at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. Both of their strategies greatly assisted African-Americans during this time period. Both were passionate activists who fought for their causes in vastly different ways and spoke out for what they believed in.…
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Dubois were two men that drastically altered the face of Civil Rights. Both had a strong hand in education and were dynamic figures of the Progressive Age. While they both were figure heads in the social improvements in African American lives, their strategies of achieving change were very different.…
Washington believed that blacks should help themselves and rely on the whites, and in racial solidarity and accommodation, which means that blacks should be flexible and agree with what the whites say. (“Up From Slavery”) Washington also urged blacks to accept discrimination and use their energy to raise themselves up through hard work and material prosperity, and stated that blacks should work to win the respect of whites, in his 1895 speech “the Atlanta Compromise.” He believed in education in the crafts, industrial and farming skills and the cultivation of the virtues of patience, enterprise and thrift. This is what he said would allow African Americans to win the respect of whites, and to become fully accepted as citizens and integrated into all aspects of society. (Booker T. and…
Black people in America have constantly fought their ways to gain a place in American society with equal civil and economic rights, but due to America’s history – especially in the south— the black community was only seen apt to be slaves and servants not too long ago. After the Civil War, many members of the black community sought out ways to gain civil and economic rights; however, two dominant members within the black community chose diverging paths to travel. While Booker T. Washington chose sacrifice in continuation of hard labor, W.E.B DuBois had a strive to fight for civil rights which would then allow the black person to obtain equality on multiple fields. Booker T. Washington explores his path to equality in his article, The Awakening…
In 1895 there was discrimination everywhere. In America people of African descent had a miserable existence. Less than 40 years earlier, they were either “owned” property, known as slaves, or lived a very humble, poverty stricken life. Booker T. Washington was among a number of very few blacks that were articulate, well educated, and well informed. He was aware that his life stood as an example to both blacks and whites that his race was capable of much more. His purpose was to bring the United States together and show how everyone could benefit. In this speech, Booker T. Washington uses many rhetorical devices to promote changes in the combined community of the nation. In his opening statements he was clear that the audience as a participating element in society should recognize the “American Negro”.…
Washington's speaking also called for whites to take obligation for refining social and economic associations between the black and the whites. Washington guaranteed his audience that he would inspire blacks to become skillful in mechanics, commerce, agriculture, and domestic service he also promised to encourage them to glorify common labour (Perdue, 2011). Washington's speech answered the Negro problem which was the query of what to do about the horrible social and economic circumstances of blacks and the affiliation between blacks and whites in the economically fluctuating…
In his article, “Blacks Should Stop Agitating for Political Equality,” Atlanta Exposition, 1895, Booker T. Washington said that blacks should take advantage of the new opportunities given to them rather than fight for more rights. Though he understood this tendency, saying, “… it is not strange that in the first years of our new life we began at the top instead of at the bottom; that a seat in Congress or the state legislature was more sought than real estate or industrial skill; that the political convention or stump speaking had more attractions than starting a dairy farm or truck garden.” He also said, “The wisest among my race understand that the agitation of questions of social equality is the extremist folly.” This means that he did not want his fellow blacks to fight for more rights when they already had many new ones to benefit from.…
Considered the definitive statement of what Washington termed the "accommodationist" strategy of black response to southern racial tensions, the Atlanta Exposition Address was widely regarded as one of the most significant speeches in American history. Washington 's speech responded to the "Negro problem"—the question of what to do about the endless social and economic conditions of blacks and the relationship between blacks and whites in the economically shifting South. Appealing to white southerners, Washington promised his audience that he would encourage blacks to become proficient in agriculture, mechanics, commerce, and domestic service, and to encourage them to "dignify and glorify common labor”. He assured whites that blacks were loyal people who believed they would prosper in proportion to their hard work. Agitation for social equality, Washington argued, was but folly, and most blacks realized the privileges that would come from "constant struggle rather than of artificial forcing."…
January 1863, Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation declaring freedom for African American slaves in slavery states. Following the signing of the bill, African Americans started facing even more problems with racial discrimination, segregation, racism, and prejudice. African Americans were beaten, put in jail, put to death, and denied basic human rights. To say African Americans were racially discriminated against only because of the color of their skin is an understatement. They were also racially discriminated against because of their sex, their religion, and their social class. During the last decade of the 19th century, racial violence and racial discrimination dramatically increased against African Americans. African Americans were not allowed to anything white people considered to be for “whites only”. They could not join any “white” organizations,…