Preview

What Caused The Mexican American War?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1208 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Caused The Mexican American War?
What Caused the Mexican American War? The Southern desire to spread slavery caused an outbreak of war between the United States and Mexico in 1846. However, other major factors pushed these two countries to war. In the years after the War of 1812, the United States went through an industrial and technological revolution. This revolution benefited the north to a large extent and pushed the southern U.S. towards slavery and its expansion. This expansion on slavery could have been the cause of the Mexican American War. The Whig and Democratic parties of the time had different views of slavery and how it was spread into Texas, thus creating the tension needed to begin a war with Mexico. As hostility grew between the nations, the United States …show more content…
Not only did these groups disagree on the idea of slavery, with Whigs against it and Democrats for it, but these groups disagreed on land distribution. Each political party believed in their superiority and power over the other in terms of economics, Whigs, who were anti slavery, resided in the north and Democrats, who were for slavery, dominated the south. Both parties disagreed on whether or not to annex Texas, but they had the same view on why it would be annexed, for the spread of slavery. Henry Clay believed that annexing Texas would not benefit the United States. In an 1844 Letter to the Editor of the National Intelligencer, Clay asks “would Texas really add strength to that which is now considered the weakest part of the Confederacy?” Clay, a member of the Whig party, has a justified view of the unindustrialized south, for he resides in the north. Not only does Clay believe it would weaken the nation, but he believes the territory of Texas would be split into five different states, three free and two slave. In Democrat James K. Polk’s 1845 Inaugural Address, he believes that annexing Texas would be best for both areas and their safety. Polk claims “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent state or becomes an ally or dependency of some foreign nation more powerful than herself…” In Frederick Douglass’s 1848 editorial he blames Polk for beginning the war, claiming it was “the determination of our slaveholding president to prosecute the war.” The Whig and Democrat views on Texas’s annexation created a dispute over power and caused the Mexican American

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The conclusion of the Mexican-American War by the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848 signaled the start of a new era for the United States, a period of crisis and growing division between the North and the South. The failure of the Wilmot Proviso provoked tensions between Northerners and Southerners within the Democratic party, division which in turn influenced the creation of the Free-Soil party. United under a bipartisan platform centered on the containment of the “peculiar institution” of slavery below the 36°30′ line, disgruntled Whigs and Democrats became firm opponents of the westward expansion of slavery, and loud critics of the South’s slaveocracy. Despite a defeat in the presidential election of 1848, the Free-Soilers revealed the growing divisions within America’s political system, and successfully opened the political landscape of the United States for newcomer Republicans and their abolitionist cause. Meanwhile, a massive migration of Americans to the territory of California stimulated by the…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision in which Texas should become annexed was an ongoing battle in which many people have many different beliefs. Henry Clay a famous speaker of the house believed that we should not annex Texas. One of the reasons was that he believed it would start a war with Mexico. He also believed that it would not help the Union at all. Another man John L. O'Sullivan believed that we should annex Texas. One of his main reasons is that it would add more land, power, and another state to the Union.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spanish American War is one of the most prominent wars in U.S. history. The war began on April 21, 1898 due to many different reasons. The real questions is, for what reasons did the U.S. get involved in this war? Well, the Spanish American War began due to the fight for Cuban independence, Yellow Journalism, the Spanish governor’s response to Cuban rebels, the De Lôme letter, and the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This caused an unstable equilibrium with political parties. Two of those leaders who strongly supported the Annexation of Texas and slavery was James K. Polk and James Tyler. Opponents of Slavery viewed Tylers “unscrupulous nature of proslavery forces.”(354) They feared the annexation would spread slavery into the west if the United States gained territory. The texas annexation essentially caused an uproar in the political atmosphere, as it “revived sectional tensions over slavery and westward expansion”(O'Donnell, Edward and Cornell…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The south grew more dependant on ‘king cotton’ and slavery kept on going. More northeners believed that the south had an unfair advantage because the south had little to no labour costs as to the north they had to emply free people that cost money because of the no slave rule in their land. In 1873, texas joined the union as a slave holding state. This threatened to ruin the balance in congress achieved by thr Missouri compromise. James Polk became president in 1844. He pushed to get texas included as a slave holding state for cheap cotton production in 1846, but oregan (British owned) was added as a free state that same year. This is known as the texas compromise. Polk declared war on mexico falsly claiming that Mexicans had attacked and killed US citizenz on American soil. The Mexican war ended in 1848 with the treaty of Acudelupe Hidalgo which added more than 1 million square miles to the US. (more than he Louisiana…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple explanation as to the cause of the Spanish-American war is that it was due to the way the Spanish were treating the Cuban people. But things are rarely that simple and the war between Spain and America is no exception. Leading up to the war American’s began to feel that we did not have enough room to grow and American journalists fed the desire for foreign adventure by romanticizing it, much the way the frontier had been romanticized. Huge Naval ships were built and Darwinism convinced politicians that the earth belonged to the strongest country.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican-American war lasted from 1846-1848. It consisted of numerous battles that resulted in more American victories than Mexican victories. During the first battle at Palo Alto, Mexican troops outnumbered American troops; however, the Mexican troops were poorly equipped and poorly led. Contrastly, the American army was well-trained and President Polk had formulated a three-pronged approach to defeat the Mexicans. Multiple factors played into the war, such as manifest destiny, Mexican attacks and stubbornness, and feelings of superiority, that caused the United States to declare war.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexico did not own Texas, and was no longer any extension of it. In the passing 9 years Texas applied for two annexations, but were never accepted (Roden 317). It wasn't America’s desiring to be one with Texas in the first place. Texas was wanting to become U.S. and were no longer Mexico at the time. Our president at the time had a strong belief in Manifest Destiny, along with many others at the time, making Texas a great addition to…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican-American War, also known as the Mexican War, was small. It began when American negotiations with Mexico to settle the dispute of the Texas border and purchase California and New Mexico were ignored. Angered, president James K. Polk sent troops to…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What effects did the Mexican War have on the United States? We can see that with the United States victory in the Mexican War, tensions between the pro-slavery South and anti-slavery North over territory gained during the war grew. Tindall and Shi (2013) states that “initially the victory in Mexico unleashed a surge of national pride in the United States, but as the years passed, the Mexican War also proved to be a catalyst in deepening sectional tensions over slavery”. Tindall and Shi (2013) quotes Ulysses S. Grant as calling the war “one of the most unjust wars ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation”.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Political Causes

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages

    At the time the large majority of the Texas population favored the annexation of the Republic by the United States. The leadership of both major U.S. political parties, the Democrats and the Whigs, were against the introduction of Texas, because it was a huge slave-holding region. They didn’t see it as the best fit at the time because of the pro and antislavery disagreement. But they also wanted to avoid war with Mexico. The Republic Texas eventually became part of the United States.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America was going to do whatever to annex Texas. Mexican authorities told the U.S any attempt to annex Texas was going to be seen as a declaration of war with Mexico. When Congress passed a Joint resolution to annex Texas, Mexico did not want any diplomatic issues to do with the United States. The Mexican minister felt the annexation was an attack against Mexico and stated that this was the most unfair act which has ever been recorded in history. Mexico began to take more action in the war…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lewis Cass 1848

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The topic of slavery caused significant division in America. This was partly due to the fact that America had recently acquired the land known as present day California, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, and Colorado. Aside from that, the results of the 1846 Mexican American War also led to the annexation of Texas (Howe). With such a huge increase in land, the big question came down to whether or not slavery would be prohibited, and many in the North and South held different viewpoints on the tolerance of slavery. Slavery inevitably became the most vital influence on the outcome of presidential election of 1848.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slave Compromise

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During 1820-1860, several reasons in the political views on slavery eventually led to the termination of compromise. Henry Clay, the Great Compromiser, generated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850 in order to maintain the country as a whole. The Missouri Compromise declared Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state, ended slave trade in Washington D.C. and a stronger Fugitive Slave Law passed. In 1833, Senator Henry Clay stated,”…it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired for a moment to become a separate and independent state. Additionally, although Declaration of the National Anti-Slavery Convention in 1834 opposed slavery, they did believe Congress had “no right to interfere with any of the slave states…” .However, the northern disagreement against the Compromise of 1850, especially the Fugitive Slave Law, Wilmot Proviso and popular sovereignty, increased slavery’s opposition. This was emphasized in the Election of 1860, where not one Southern state voted for Lincoln; Lincoln won all of the “free” states except New Jersey. This major issue over slavery ultimately led to southern succession therefore deterioration of compromise. This is similar all of the times when individual states attempted to secede from the Union for various reasons, such as states’ rights. Western Expansion in Polk’s presidency due to Manifest Destiny created problems if new territories should be slave or free states. Like always, the North opposed slave states in new territories, and South favored it.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays