The major underlying worldview question asked by every worldview or view of reality is what is a human being? This is a question that crosses everybody minds, following with what our purpose in life is (hardest one to answer). To me, this goes hand in hand, with how we view the world. We ethically determine what we think is the best way to live and go by it. If we agree on something to be good or right it becomes our own standard, in which we decide to follow the process we chose, for example, using the terminology that refers to the glass being half full or half empty. Depending on how you view this is how you judge most situations in life. Looking at it in a negative or positive way. Just using our ethics and picking a worldview …show more content…
One of the moral beliefs is looking into sin. Worldviews for Christians and Christians views on self is people need to be perfect without sin as if one has not sinned or even made a mistake and if so, instantly they need repent and change their ways. I do not share this worldview and do not think that it is correct. I disagree, because per the Bible: Matthew chapter 12 verses 31-32, 31: And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. 32 Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come. Therefor only one sin cannot be forgiven. As a Christian myself, no one is perfect, so we cannot judge others to a higher standard. The existing world sees us a pure and not sinful. We live a balanced life like any other. We are just really trying our best to live in the way God wants us to live, I strongly believe that we just need to treat others how we would like to be treated. If you feel uncomfortable doing or saying something that will offend you in any way, then do not do it, that simple. The moral responsibility is the same for Christian and non-Christian views we all strive for being a better …show more content…
By the educational research state Growing concern about a shrinking cultural consensus on values, coupled with religious pluralization and the realization that schooling is not, and cannot be, value-neutral, have led to proposals to teach ethics in schools, interpreted as a contribution of the discipline of philosophy to the common curriculum. To the extent that this approach is seen to hinge on the alleged autonomy of ethics, it has the potential to indoctrinate the contestable view that rationality is the prime motivator of moral commitment. A case is made for regarding philosophical ethics and religious (or world-view) studies not as alternative avenues to values education but each as a core curriculum priority, different but complementary to the other in its content. (Hill, 2014) there for as Wilkens writes in his book Christian worldview are valid tools to bring to the table in evaluating our moral bases. At the same time, it employs the usual means of critiquing ethical theory—logical consistency, possibility of universalization, consequences and the like. (Wilkens, 2011) It is really critical and important for us to grasp the meaning of worldviews and ethical thinking, because is it something this generation is really lacking now a days in better term common sense is no longer common, and my theory is if we teach this at an early time in life we will be