Preview

What Is The Als Ice Bucket Challenge

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
605 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Als Ice Bucket Challenge
Through out the month of August, we have all seen the ALS ice bucket challenge. Both celebrities and the everyday average civilian dumping water on themselves to raise awareness for ALS and the ALS Foundation. ALS disease is also known as Lou Gehrig's disease. Well known actor Charlie Sheen took the challenge but also had a different twist on it. The event is recorded and at the beginning of the video it begins as every other ice bucket challenge does. Sheen states his name, who he was called out by, and then proceeds to pretend to be a little nervous that he is dumping a bucket of freezing cold water on his head. Then comes the plot twist. Instead of dumping a pot of freezing ice water on his head, Charlie Sheen dumps 10,000 in cash on his head. He makes a joke about it stating, “Oh wait, that's not …show more content…
Everyone else has been dumping cold water on their heads and donating ten dollars, opposed to Sheen who actually donates the money, and shows people that this is what everyone should be doing. Towards the end of the video Charlie Sheen calls out a few people, as always in the ice bucket challenge, and says, “... I am hereby calling out John Cryer, Chuck Lorre, and Ashton Kutcher to identically do what I just did. Come on guys, it's for a great cause...” This video/event applies to the SAEM industry because of it's fundraising aspect. As stated before, every person who performs the ALS ice bucket challenge has to call out someone else to do the same thing that they just did. This raises awareness for the ALS foundation, which 5,600 American citizens are diagnosed with every single year. Having celebrities doing this act changes the cards because it's clear that they have a lot more money, and they are calling out other folks to do the same exact

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A A good deed by a famous, wealthy man doesn’t seem all that remarkable. Hollywood…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alyssa Carchietta Essay

    • 6359 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Do you think by hiring a celebrity to endorse a product is worth the large amount of money invested to…

    • 6359 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hospice Swot Analysis

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Lack of X team working (shops, lottery and fundraising) and missed opportunities due to this and separate databases…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer is the author to the “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” article. Singer 's essay argues that there is basically no reason why Americans should not be donating their extra money to those in need. Singer addresses the urgency to donate by appealing to the reader 's sense of ethos, pathos, and logos.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The fact that 30 Takes Thirty already has two well-known Canadian artists it is only a matter of utilizing them properly to create a buzz around their cause. Holding an event, becoming more active online and using TV media are three ways to start to promote your cause using your celebrities. By having them speak about (fundraising event), write about (blog, social networks) and be visible (all mass media) are all key tactics to target potential donors, future members and enthusiastic volunteers.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If they donate, they can lead a ‘morally decent life’ (according to Singer). What would happen if everyone were to donate their spending money, rather than to buy new clothes or electronics? Singer fails to look at the other side of the story. Say everyone was to stop spending. Our economy would most likely suffer (more than it is currently). Stores would go out of business if everyone stopped upgrading their electronics and buying new clothes. Is it justifiable to compromise our economy to save children in third world countries? Singer needs to get off his high horse. He thinks his way is the only way, when there are many ways to donate and help others.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This time it isn’t just a single person faced with a morally challenging situation, this time it’s just people. People that choose not to donate and help children with simple illnesses so they ultimately die due to starvation and lack of strength. Singer believes that if everyone would donate $200 it “would help a sickly two-year-old transform into a healthy six-year-old”. In Singer’s article, he lists two different organizations, Unicef and Oxfam, along with the numbers so that everyone reading will be persuaded to also donated to help children in need. Singer then goes to say that middle-class Americans can certainly donate more than $200. In fact, Singer says that Americans should donate in amounts more like $20,000. Singer comes to this reasoning because “a household with an income of $50,000 spends around $30,000 annually on necessities, according to the Conference Board. . .” Singer believes that whatever is left should be donated to children in need via the two toll free numbers he listed in his…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Madison has organized many fundraising events in which raised money is donated to charities. Some events include holding garage sales and opening lemonade stands where raised money were donated to organizations such as Canadian Lung Association. Recently, she has organized a Walk for our Future for youth where thousands of raised money have been donated for breast cancer research.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peopl Singer Analysis

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even if the money they give to infrastructure or food for them, it still is help and as long as it does not go back into their pockets. Many may say that this isn’t an issue that they think of on a daily basis and that if they saw it in front of them then they would do something about. However, they do see it. We see it when we go out in public, the homeless who ask for money. A meal that we eat could last them days of meals to the homeless who don’t have any food at all. It is an obligation to do so, as you would be extremely appreciative of someone who did it for you. Singer says we also shouldn’t do it because we feel like we have to, instead because it comes out of our hearts. Imagine if everyone in the entire world contributed to someone’s well being? Things like world hunger wouldn’t even occur. Also, it’s not like people aren’t aware, they just choose to not take the blindfold off as they think “it’s not my problem”. Another example would be walking passed a drowning child and you ignore it, this is morally…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During a game in 2006 he blocked a punt which allowed the Saints to win their home game which was considered a symbol for recovery for the team because of the recent damage caused by hurricane Katrina. He has made a lasting impact on the lives of many including his fans, team, family, and countless others because of his phenomenal career and constant perseverance. Unfortunately Steve Gleason revealed that he had been diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in 2011. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, commonly known as ALS, is a terminal debilitating disease that impacts the nervous system weakening and prohibiting typical physical function. However Gleason does not allow this disease to control how he lives his life. He has lead a life that inspires others; he refuses to stop looking for a cure, views everyday, every minute, as a gift, and he treats it as such. It was said that (enter quote from fault in our stars) disease defines you and that is who you are, but this is not the case with Gleason. He has taken the opportunity to show others what our potential is and how today we are able to make a difference. The producers of this commercial use Steve Gleason because he is well…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Billionaire Sacrifice

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Singer begins his essay with a simple question, “What is a human life worth?” (578). “Singer suggests that most people would be unwilling to a value on the life another human”. Singer continues the topic by writing about some of the charitable beliefs of Bill Gates and how it was that Gates developed some of those values over time, which was in part due to hearing about a viral infection that kills around five hundred million children each year. Singer then goes on to give a statistic that around a billion people must survive on the equivalent of “less than one U.S. dollar per day” and that “more than ten million children die every year . . . from avoidable, poverty-related…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response to Peter Singer

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Everyday wealthy and middle class Americans across the country spend money on luxury items such as: flat screen televisions, laptop computers, digital cameras, fancy cars, and smart phones. At the same time, across the globe in poverty stricken countries, people and children are living in destitution. Many of these people lack a basic human need which commonly includes nutrition, healthcare, education, clothing, shelter, and clean water. Peter Singer, author of 'The Singer Solution to World Poverty', suggests that all Americans that are financially stable to donate should be donating all their non-essential money to the needy people across the globe. This seems like the morally right thing to do, however Singers argument overlooks many factors in his bias, and leaves to many questions unanswered to make his essay true or reasonable to any extent. Is it morally right to make a hardworking American give up all luxuries to the needy people they will never meet? Of course, Americans should feel the need to donate to the needy people of our world. Although the amount they donate should be entirely up to them.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the comment that Peter Singer’s argument that individuals should donate to alleviate poverty and save lives does not address the underlying structural socioeconomic causes of poverty. His argument for a redistribution of wealth on an individual basis still operates under an economic system where there is an unequal distribution of wealth. As a result, even if individuals donate money, poorer countries will always be reliant on these wealthier countries and individuals for survival resulting in an increased power imbalance. However, I also think that it is important not to disregard these contributions to people in poverty simply because they do not fix the system, as these contributions do have the power to save and improve lives…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the issue of poverty by suggesting Americans give away most of their income to aid those in need. Singer believes that withholding income is the equivalence of letting a child starve to death. Therefore, Singer suggests the ethical thing to do to end world hunger is to give up everyday luxuries. Although donating a vast amount of money could help dying and starving children, Singer’s proposition is not only unrealistic but also too demanding for everyday Americans who have responsibilities of their own.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer urges that Americans should donate every last penny they earn if it is not going toward necessities, people may find this ludicrous, or people may find it to be a plausible solution to end poverty around the world. I on the other hand agree with the people who work every day of their life to support their own family, not with the people who think it is so simple to just stick out their hand and expect to get money graciously given to them. The American people are hardworking and do not deserve to be guilted into giving charity. So many times on television the American people view commercials that beg for them to provide places in Africa and other countries with money so that they can afford schooling or a substantial meal every day. What those commercials show are the places in Africa that unfortunately do not have a steady form of currency, but in truth there are many whereabouts in Africa that in fact have a more stable economy then cities in America. This leads me to refute Singer’s “simple” solution, why is he proposing this idea to Americans who are currently in a recession, when in reality these countries should help themselves. America is a very generous country; funds are given by our government to help other populations constantly, Singer has no right to pressure citizens of the U.S to “donate” out of pocket to these other countries.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays