What Was The Difference Between Spanish France And Brazil

Revolutions in the eighteenth century saw a drastic change for Europe, which had been mainly ruled by monarchies since the fall of the Roman Empire. One such revolution was the French Revolution and the subsequent Napoleonic Wars that followed. This drastic change in France spread to neighboring countries like Spain and Portugal, and in turn spread to their colonies in the Americas. The Napoleonic Wars enabled the citizens of Spanish America and Brazil to question their systems of governance, which later paved the way for revolutions across the Americas after its residents observed change in the role of the Spanish and Portuguese crowns and their physical presence. The changing scope of monarchy as a result of the Napoleonic Wars saw a shift
Their rulers were closer than ever, which in time would make them question why they needed governance from across the Atlantic at all. As a result of the new forms of governance that existed in Spanish America and Brazil, Spanish colonists resolved to separate themselves from their new French ruler, whereas the Brazilians drew away from Portugal. Spanish Americans had already begun resenting the Peninsulars, and had begun developing a new idea based on birthplace rather than race. This allowed them to present a united front when challenging the governance structures that existed in order to install their own leaders in emerging sovereign nations. Brazilian residents, who stood closer to their original monarch, began to chafe under new policies, such as the restriction of the slave trade. When the Portuguese demanded their monarch back after Napoleon’s defeat, Joao obliged, and left his son Pedro to rule Brazil. Brazil saw no reason to remain a colony, and Pedro took advantage of the growing tide with Portugal to remain in Brazil, announce his loyalty to the colony, and proclaim himself monarch of an independent