Why All Children Should Be Considered Winners
Should all Children be Considered Winners?
Think of what the world would be like if everyone was given a trophy for just participating in a sport. That wouldn’t be much fun now, would it? Children all over the world are being rewarded for things they didn’t learn and, this is not right. Children should not be awarded for just participating, children should be awarded for winning 1st, 2nd, or 3rd. This should happen because if everyone is placed on a unilateral performance scale, then students may never be motivated to challenge themselves. And finally because of all the lessons students will learn from losing. My first reason why kids should not be considered winners just for participation is because if everyone is placed on a unilateral performance scale, then students may never be motivated to challenge themselves. According to Letise Dennis, “An otherwise average student, in terms of GPA, may be complacent and go through their academic career completely happy with their current grades. However, introduce the chance to win a scholarship to college or the opportunity to speak at graduation, and students have proven over time that this is a driving force to work harder to boost their GPA and class …show more content…
I know this because according to Letise Dennis, “It is okay if they are upset because they lose. What this will do is serve to teach that they don’t need to be afraid of losing—that at some point everyone goes through a loss. It’s what happens after the loss that matters. Students learn to take pride in knowing they did the best they could, challenge themselves to work harder next time, and even eventually learn to put themselves aside and congratulate the winner.” This very well states that by playing a sport kids can learn from their mistakes. Which is apart of life so it's good for kids to start learning and get
Think of what the world would be like if everyone was given a trophy for just participating in a sport. That wouldn’t be much fun now, would it? Children all over the world are being rewarded for things they didn’t learn and, this is not right. Children should not be awarded for just participating, children should be awarded for winning 1st, 2nd, or 3rd. This should happen because if everyone is placed on a unilateral performance scale, then students may never be motivated to challenge themselves. And finally because of all the lessons students will learn from losing. My first reason why kids should not be considered winners just for participation is because if everyone is placed on a unilateral performance scale, then students may never be motivated to challenge themselves. According to Letise Dennis, “An otherwise average student, in terms of GPA, may be complacent and go through their academic career completely happy with their current grades. However, introduce the chance to win a scholarship to college or the opportunity to speak at graduation, and students have proven over time that this is a driving force to work harder to boost their GPA and class …show more content…
I know this because according to Letise Dennis, “It is okay if they are upset because they lose. What this will do is serve to teach that they don’t need to be afraid of losing—that at some point everyone goes through a loss. It’s what happens after the loss that matters. Students learn to take pride in knowing they did the best they could, challenge themselves to work harder next time, and even eventually learn to put themselves aside and congratulate the winner.” This very well states that by playing a sport kids can learn from their mistakes. Which is apart of life so it's good for kids to start learning and get