Since the union outnumbered the south troops that was already a reasoning to why they won,…
The Northern armies reigned victorious, and the rebelling states were returned to the Union. Since the start of the war, the Union devised a strategy. They planned to blockade the South and drive on the Confederate capital. Even though organizing it took about four years, it was the single strategy that won the war. Lincoln and Grant cooperated well.…
The South did have some advantages though. Several Indian tribes joined the Confederacy, and the Union troops would have to move in and conquer the land, then force it to be a part of the Union again. They also had more talented military leaders than the North. But the North had more men, most of the railroads, and they controlled the sea. The government of the North was well established, and functioned with little difficulty in comparison to the new and hastily made government in the South. Both sides had disadvantages as well. The South began to run out of supplies, they did not have a major transportation system, and they had a weak economy. Some of their troops refused to fight outside their own states. The North’s disadvantages were the men being unprepared for military life, and poor choice of commanders.…
In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…
Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…
The north (the union) and the south (the confederacy), prepared for war believed that they would win easily. To achieve a victory in war, both side will make a plan or strategy to win. The armies of both north and south marched off to war on the summer of 1861, their leaders created a plan to win. The north states possess twice the population of southern states, which gave more soldiers, farmers and industrial workers.…
There were several factors that allowed the north to win the Civil War, One of the main reasons is that the north had far more soldiers and resources than the south. Then on the Proclamation's provisions, the blacks were allowed enrollment into the military which added even more men to the Northerners side.…
The South began the civil war with a bleak outset, their only hope being their skilled generals and the stance of a defensive war, but despite what historians may say it was the North that underestimated the South. Prior to the start of the war the obvious winner would be the North for they held the most ascendancy in the splitting nation. The North contained seventy percent of the country’s railroads which gave them the lead in the swiftness to travel. Troops, supplies, and weapons could be sent within days instead of weeks, but more importantly information could be received faster and acted upon quickly. Factories were also a benefactor that the North had; factories produced the guns and ships that were a priority to the war efforts.…
The North wasn’t crushing the South like they thought they would. The South wasn’t necessarily winning but they weren’t being beaten so the perception of them “winning” came about. The South had claimed to have better military leaders and better tactics during battle. They Won the First Battle of Bull Run, the Second Battle of Bull Run, Chancellorsville and Fredericksburg. These battles…
The Union won the Civil War, because the North had more people able to join the war, better economic to support the war effort, the North had experience and a credit history, and larger navy then the south. The North had “97% of nation firearms” (Carnes 378). The South had 9 million people with 3.5 million of the 9 million being slaves and unable to join the army. The North had 20 million people and were able to have former slave enlist into their army. The North had bigger and better navy then the South.…
Despite the North having more production and population, the South could have won the Civil War with a few adjustments. Notice how the South’s largest production is cotton, compared to the North. The North had a balance of different types of production, which enabled the soldiers to be easily equipped with materials and accumulate wealth. One of the major reasons why the South lost was that it spent more on cotton production instead of increasing the other types of production. If it spent more on the different types, it could have won. The South depended heavily on agricultural type of labor, through the use of slaves. The slave owners did not free the slaves, since they were needed to cultivate the cotton to raise profit for the owners. Moreover,…
When the Confederate Army General Robert E. Lee surrendered to the Union Army General, Ulysses S. Grant at the Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1865, many considered the Civil War to be over. The fact that the North was victorious over the South was accepted and the process of reconstruction began in America. It was never openly discussed on why the North defeated the South. However, the question began to slowly arise over time on why the South lost the Civil War. Many historians have become interested in this question and many reasons have been given on why the South lost the Civil War. Lack of manpower, shortages of supplies, and inferior leadership and government were the three main reasons on why the South was defeated in the Civil War.…
The South won the Civil War. History says that the North won but in my opinion that is not true. The North won the fighting but what were they fighting for? They were fighting to end slavery. They did not achieve this goal. Yes, slavery was legally abolished but it started right back up again in other forms. First there was sharecropping. Than Confederate soldiers took office. That only made matters worse. Then after they took office they managed to pass Jim Crow laws and Black Codes. The South definitely won the Civil War.…
If the south won the Civil War The civil war started when the confederates bombarded Union Soldiers at Fort Sumter, South Carolina on April 12, 1861. The civil war ended in spring 1865. Robert E. Lee surrendered the last confederate army to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1965. In addition the last battle was fought at Palmito Ranch, which is located in Texas on May 13, 1865.…
The Union won the Civil War because of how they had more of superior resources than the Southerners. The Civil War began when the Northern and the Southern argued for their perspective on slavery, economic policies, and cultural practices. The difference between the Northern and the Southern states that contributed to tensions is that the Northern…