tried to ban the possession of handguns we will see many arguments on why a person does not need to carry a handgun and why a person should be allowed to do so. If you were to ask a hundred people how they felt about gun control, you would probably get a hundred different answers. So I can see the arguments that were brought forward in this case. Let’s ask ourselves, will preventing someone from carrying a concealed handgun on them prevent crime or someone from being killed with a handgun? No not at all. Just because we take the rights away to carry a handgun will not prevent someone from being killed. Any person can get a handgun or assault rifle anytime they want, whether it is in a legal manner or in an illegal manner. I think this is why in the cases with Chicago and Washington D.C. the Supreme Court reversed the decision to ban possession of handguns in both the states. On June 28, 1010, the Supreme Court in a 5-4 vote decided to reverse the decision, stating that the Second Amendment was incorporated under the Fourteenth Amendment therefore protecting the rights to “keep and bear
tried to ban the possession of handguns we will see many arguments on why a person does not need to carry a handgun and why a person should be allowed to do so. If you were to ask a hundred people how they felt about gun control, you would probably get a hundred different answers. So I can see the arguments that were brought forward in this case. Let’s ask ourselves, will preventing someone from carrying a concealed handgun on them prevent crime or someone from being killed with a handgun? No not at all. Just because we take the rights away to carry a handgun will not prevent someone from being killed. Any person can get a handgun or assault rifle anytime they want, whether it is in a legal manner or in an illegal manner. I think this is why in the cases with Chicago and Washington D.C. the Supreme Court reversed the decision to ban possession of handguns in both the states. On June 28, 1010, the Supreme Court in a 5-4 vote decided to reverse the decision, stating that the Second Amendment was incorporated under the Fourteenth Amendment therefore protecting the rights to “keep and bear