Firearms are weapons of destruction, annihilation, and carnage. However, a lot of people disagree and have very legitimate reasons why firearms should not be banned. There are several controversies that suggest banning the use or possession of firearms. Guns should not be banned. In contrast, guns can be weapons of destruction or a form of self-protection; depending on the user and the training of that particular person. Being trained by a firearms instructor can help users know the importance of firearm safety and how to properly use firearms. Firearms are to be used for self-protection and war. Also, taking away firearms is against the 2nd amendment; according to the United States Constitution--"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Therefore, banning firearms is against the United States Constitution. In conclusion firearms are to not be banned and should remain in the hands of responsible, trained, citizens. Certified firearm instructors are imperative in ensuring Americans have the right to bear guns.Thus, an instructor can teach the basics of gun safety and can also express how to use a gun. Gun safety is needed in having a gun; therefore, everyone should be required to take a basic course in …show more content…
Guns can be a sense of security. Guns can also be destructive and used to kill people. It depends on the user of the gun and the knowledge of that particular person rather or not a gun is a killing machine. The true purpose of a gun is for protection. If guns are banned, people will surely riot; resulting in a civil war. Therefore, banning guns would cause more trouble than there are ready is. Many people need guns, such as police. Guns benefit police every single day. Guns need to be taken seriously; more coaching is needed. Once this problem is deciphered; guns will no longer be a