Another reason why Asoka wasn’t an enlightened ruler was because he was selfish. After he
Another reason why Asoka wasn’t an enlightened ruler was because he was selfish. After he
| |Mauryan: ruled by Chandragupta Maurya and later on by his Grandson | | |…
Asoka was one of the greatest rulers of ancient India. He was the grandson of Chandragupta Maurya of Magadha who established the first Indian empire. Chandragupta reigned for twenty-four years before relinquishing his throne in favor of his son, Bundusara (Asoka's father), who left no noticeable mark upon the empire. My thesis would be that Asoka was an enlightened ruler and not a ruthless conqueror.…
well. He is noble but flawed, has a specific downfall, and gains knowledge from it; he is a…
like that he was not helping the upper class because he was in favor of…
final acts in office, President Jackson was regarded as a great hero, yet at the same time…
Emperor Hirohito was the 124th emperor of Japan. He was the longest living ruler in modern history. During Emperor Hirohito's occupying the throne as ruler he tried to stay out of things and wasn't a hand on man but as war started his military and government got out of his control and gave him a bad reputation that would live with him the rest of his life.…
Asoka was the ruler of the mauryan empire and ruled his empire for decades, until he died in 261 BCE. It is very much argued if Asoka is ruthless or enlightened, but in my perspective Asoka is an intelligent enlightened ruler. The fact that Asoka only did what is right for his empire, thought everyone who did wrong should be forgiven, and gave rich gifts to the poor clearly proves that he was an enlightened ruler. To start off, Asoka did not want to hurt anyone he just wanted a strong and satisfied empire. When Asoka fought the Kalingas he did not mean to harm anything or anyone he just wanted to boost his economy for his empire.…
However, against an army of 200,000 men, he didn’t stand a fighting chance. He was killed with a sword to the neck. Others didn’t have such a quick merciful death. Some were trampled by strange beasts from other lands.…
Was Asoka a Ruthless Conqueror or Enlightened Ruler? Asoka, a serious prince of Mauryan Empire, had many different characteristics. After he conquered Kalinga, he was seeking Guru to find enlightenment. Asoka took leadership of the Mauryan Empire in 268 B.C. All those things show that he was an enlightened ruler. On the other hand he was defiantly not a ruthless conqueror because he went to seek Buddha, the Asokan edicts, and cared about the misfortunate.…
Anywhere between seventy five million to two hundred million people died as a result of the Plague, known as the Black Death. The Plague did not just affect the Peasants, as people died no matter the social class. This left empty spaces in the nation, that peasants could fill in and escape their lords feudalistic boundaries. However, without the help of towns and trade, these peasants would not have had many opportunities to flourish as they did.…
An example of this is when he escaped from jail and told people he was their emperor.…
He did not want to be seen as a greater power, he wanted to seem like a normal person. (Portrait of a Visigothic…
Attila’s death was unexpected. But for 4 centuries he had ruled the eastern and western Empires. He thought that he had done the impossible. He had conquered most of Europe. Though barbaric he is still remembered today but he had definitely earned his nicknamed-The Scourge of…
and noticed through the people of his country. He did not favor those who were rich that seeked…
The emperor is selfish because he is arrogant. One way he shows he is arrogant is he practically worships clothes and only buys new clothes with his money. The text also says that, “He never drove in the woods or went to the theater or reviewed the troops in the army unless it was to show off some new costume,” which supports the idea even more that the emperor is arrogant. Finally, the emperor shows he is arrogant because he admires…