Preview

Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
755 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Wrong
Throughout history, the United States has found itself as the center of controversy. A most notable event that is still debated across many public forums is the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. Historians and politicians alike have questioned the justification of the United States’s decision. After taking careful consideration of both sides of the argument, it can be determined that the Unites States was not justified in its actions. The atomic bombing of Hiroshima had many negative health effects on the people at the time it was detonated and even up till today. Many people got radiation poisoning due to the air and water in the area. About 30 minutes after the detonation of the the atomic bomb of Hiroshima, named “Little Boy,” a “black rain” began to fall. This ‘black rain” was made up of dirt, soot, and highly radioactive particles that contaminated the air and even areas far away from the detonation of the atomic bomb.The survivors of the bombing of …show more content…
For example, Secretary of War, Henry L. Stimson, believed that the bombs were an unnecessary step because Japan had no allies, its navy was almost destroyed, and its cities were undergoing fire raids from the United States.The inventor of the atomic bomb, Leo Szilard, sent a petition to President Truman in July 1945, which was signed by 68 scientists who helped build the atomic bomb. “This petition asked the President to seriously consider the moral implications of using weapons of mass destruction on the Japanese,” according to reformation.org. Szilard also said that the use for the atomic bomb was to only be used if an attack by Nazi Germany was made on the United States. (reformation.org) Albert Einstein said that in his own judgement that the use of the atomic bomb was more for a political and diplomatic decision rather than a military or scientific

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Harry Truman was a president who volunteered in WW1. Harry Truman was born in Missouri on May 8, 1884. He was commonly known for the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan, which caused many casualties with lives being lost on both sides such as in Japan and the U.S., however this ended the war even faster and ended the conflict with the pacific. In this paper I will argue that Harry Truman was wrong for dropping the atomic bomb on Japan; several reasons why it was wrong for Harry Truman to drop the atomic bomb was Russia got the idea of making nuclear weapons, Japan’s resources were already being wiped out and the amount of civilian casualties Japan had due to the bomb and radiation.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The U.S. Went through all the pros and cons of dropping the bomb some of the negatives were the effects that i would have on the people. The Atomic bomb was dropped on two civilian cities in japan which when detonated it killed many of the civilians within the city, destroying all the buildings in its path. After the destruction caused by the atomic bomb ceased the after effects consisted of toxic rain and radiation, this caused many deaths in itself that still show some effects even today. Radiation traces can still be found today in these areas effected by the bombs.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The research of the atomic bomb was brought up to President Roosevelt during World War II by Albert Einstein who had fled from Germany and Enrico Fermi, who also fled Italy. They both knew how about the atomic technology being researched by the Axis powers and both agreed that the President of the United States should know about it. This information is what started the effort and design of the atomic bomb known as, the Manhattan Project. The Manhattan Project was very secretive, only a few select people knew of what was going on, to keep the Axis powers unaware of their progress (“The Manhattan Project”). When the bomb was complete they tested it on July 16, 1945 and decided it would be a useful weapon in the war. On August 6, 1945 the United States became the first in the world to use nuclear weapons against another country. They used two atomic bombs to attempt to end the war, first on Hiroshima, and three days later on Nagasaki. The bombing of these two cities was not justified because there were other tactical options, thousands of innocent civilians were killed, and the bomb left the two cities with many deadly long-term effects.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In august of 1945, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a questionable decision by Harry Truman, the president of The United States of America. Throughout the years, it has been a heated debate in terms of whether the decision was morally correct and justified. Historians have analyzed and presented many arguments. In this short essay, I will attempt to expand on how historians feel about the decision by Truman to use atomic bombs. The revisionists bring into perspective and question the motivations of Harry Truman claiming he had more on his agenda than just the war. In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs was somewhat justified because if looked at statistically, the death toll with an invasion would have been higher and Truman…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some critics may argue that the use of the atomic bomb was completely the last option the United States had because “the Japanese military was refusing to give up their fight” (ushistory.org). That was what ultimately caused Truman to make the decision to drop the bomb. What they were careless in thinking about was that not all…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    poopp

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. Beebe ', Gilbert. "Reflections on the Work of the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission in Japan." Epidemiologic Reviews. 1. (1979): n. page. Web. 20 Dec. 2012. .…

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, President Harry Truman plans to drop an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This bomb is supposed to have a major impact on this city. Tens of thousands of people are estimated to die on impact, and thousands are estimated to die after due to the exposure to radiation. President Truman wants to drop the bomb to end the six year war, however, it has caused a major controversy over the amount of damage it will cause. Some people believe that this amount of destruction is needed to assure the war ends. They believe that Japan is going to attack the United States soon, and because the USA is low on resources, they are more vulnerable for the attack. Others think that we should drop the bomb, Little Man, in a nearby harbor to scare the Japanese. They also think that the atomic bomb is too extreme. The blast of the bomb is supposed to be…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender..." Admiral William D. Leahy (Alperovitz,The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb, date of publication unknown) There have been many issues involved with the use of the atomic bomb because of the high cost of lives, and that it was considered to be immoral and unethical. However it has also been considered necessary for the war to have ended, avoiding further casualties on both sides.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As World War II was coming to an end during 1945, the creation of one of the most destructive weapons known to humanity occurred within the United States. This weapon, known as “the atomic bomb,” was used on the two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in a death toll unprecedented by any military weapon used before and an immediate, unconditional surrender. Some historians believe President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union whereas others believe it was a strictly military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In the Report of a Scientific Panel of nuclear physicists, some scientific colleagues believed the atomic bomb was a “purely technical demonstration” to induce surrender. Other scientists believed that the use of the atomic bomb will improve international prospects in that they are more concerned with the prevention of war than with the elimination of this special weapon (Doc G). Thus, the United States dropped the atomic bomb to both force Japan’s unconditional surrender and to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As barbaric as the atomic bomb was, the opposing argument would point out that “the face of war is the face of death...the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war” (Document 3). It’s true that death is inevitable during war time, but over one hundred thousand Japanese deaths is excessive, especially when many were civilian deaths. Although the atomic bomb did bring an end to the war in the Pacific, “the Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender” (Document 2). The bombing was unnecessary, and an excessive use of…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1947, the United States was put in a difficult position. While the Japanese emperor did not want to lose his position, or lose honor, they could either fight until the last man stands or find another way. With the creation of an atomic bomb becoming more and more feasible, with the help of Mr. Einstein, it seemed like a great idea. But, there were many things they didn’t think about when they jumped to the idea of dropping the bomb; some were Japan’s surrender and the future of the civilians. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not necessary.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, in 1941, the United States reactions was justified for violent reaction, because of the attack by the Japanese. However, the people from Japan, may claim valid reason to attack, because of "Right Intention," but the United States action of dropping two separate nuclear weapons on two different cities, was an unjust war and extremely evil (Mattison). So, USA was justified in defending their island, but became unjust after the first nuclear attack, because it became responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of women, children, and men. Destroying Hospitals, Churches, and Historical sites, which is illegal under international law or the Geneva Code of Conventions, but this happened before the United…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Multiple meetings were held and numerous copies of General L. R. Groves memorandum, which detailed the event, were sent to important figures in the discussion of the atomic bomb. The decision to drop the bomb was not a hasty one- planning began before May of 1945. Seventy accredited individuals in the field of atomic study were educated enough about the prospect of the event that they could send a petition to President Truman supporting the use of the bomb. Due to the planning the adjudged the potential damage of the bomb, the power of this new weapon was understood before its use against Japan. Truman’s statement that “it was the most terrible thing ever discovered” is proof of that.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays