Preview

Why Is Philip I Called The King Of Spain

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1716 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Philip I Called The King Of Spain
Philip II of Spain from the House of Habsburg, son of Isabella of Portugal and Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire. His first wife was Maria Manuela of Portugal, his second wife was Mary Tudor of England, his third wife was Elizabeth of Valois in France, and his final wife was Anna of Austria. He ascended the throne of the Netherlands on October 25, 1555 and he ascended Spain on January 16, 1556. He ascended the throne at the age of 29. His domain was in Spain and he established the court in Madrid although he ruled in Portugal for some time under the name King Philip I. Philip demonstrated his absolutism in his realm by insisting that every decision be made personally and privately by himself. He believed in the divine nature of a ruler, he believed that having a strong say in all of the affairs of the empire despite its size and establishing a centralized government was important. Philip defended the the Catholic faith …show more content…

He believed in the divine nature of a ruler, he believed that having a strong say in all of the affairs of the empire despite its size and establishing a centralized government was important. Philip defended the the Catholic faith throughout the world and opposed the progress of heresy. He used religious persecution and the Spanish Inquisition to eliminate resistance to his policy of centralizing power. He also used the full power of the Spanish Inquisition against Protestant groups in Spain. For example Philip believed it was his duty to defend Catholicism against the Muslims of the Ottoman Empire and the Protestants of Europe. So Philip launched the Spanish Armada in an attempt to punish Protestant England. He also raised taxes in the Netherland and took steps to crush Protestantism. To show his devotion to the church Philip poured a great deal of money into the palace El Escorial.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    His decision to make Duke of Medina Sidonia in charge of the fleet was very questionable especially since he had never been to sea before. Philip II had ideas about how the English would attack from distance and he warned Santa Cruz and then the Duke of Medina Sidonia that the English would use this strategy (Geoffrey Parker, Why the Armada Failed). Instead of devising a strategy that would help the Armada avoid these pitfalls, he chose a strategy that made the fleet a sitting target to precisely the kind of tactics he worried about (Geoffrey Parker, Why the Armada Failed). Philip II also did not meet with his senior commanders to hear their opinions on the plans that were about to doom the Armada. (Geoffrey Parker, Why the Armada Failed). Philip II had made every decision on his own and ultimately the defeat of the armada was his fault.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the years of Philip's ruling, he successfully maintained legitimacy. He did this through winning coalition, divine right, and elitist. Philip was the wealthiest man of Spain. He could afford concessions to make the people happy. In return, they gave him legitimacy. He was also a…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    who followed him thought that power was a divine right and should be the absolute…

    • 2269 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oppositely, Phillip and Fredrick William disagreed on foreign policies. During Phillip’s reign, Spain was known as “the Empire on which the sun never sets,” for it became so large through his expansionist mindset. Philip II created military campaigns to defend Catholic Europe, for example his 1588 failed invasion of Protestant England. In contrast, Fredrick held a large European army, yet had little to no military campaigns throughout his ruling. Domestic matters concerned him more than foreign, such as agriculture and primary schools to benefit his nation in the long run. He looked upon the manual of Regulations for State Officials with great…

    • 648 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why did Phillip II launch the Armada and why did it fail? In the summer of 1588, the catholic king of Spain, Phillip II, came up with a plan to conquer protestant England. He would collect his army from the Netherlands and a huge fleet of 130 ships across the channel, with the help of France.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 17

    • 1868 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philip is an absolute monarch or ruler with total authority over government and lives of its people. Untrusting. Religious. He sees his mission in life to fight heretics and restore unity of Catholic Church.
He attacks Turkish strongholds in Mediterranean (his crusade).…

    • 1868 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    His empire went across the world and used it aggressively. When the pope wanted to stop the Muslims of Ottoman in 1571 Phillip sent his army like a true crusader. His army was huge 50,000 solders. Thanks to all the gold and silver brought to Phillip he could afford such a powerful army. Phillip inherited Spain, the Spanish Netherlands and the American colonies from his dad…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He used a combination of intelligence, military strategies, the Church, and war to create a powerful empire. He cared deeply for the church and persisted on a fair legal system. Einhard says, “Charlemagne practised the Christian religion with great devotion and piety” (The Life of Charlemagne 251). Growing up in the faith, he insisted that everyone go to church and that the churches be treated with the utmost respect, that nothing that represented evil be allowed in or left in the church. He was active in spreading charity to nearby kingdoms that were in desperate need. “He took pity on their poverty and sent them money regularly” (252). Charlemagne was quick to help Christians out of poverty and “hope that some relief and alleviation might result for the Christians living under their damnation” (252). Charlemagne hoped by befriending kings nearby that they would give mercy to those fellow Christians in need.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Srtwylfui

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1588 Phillip 11 sent an armada to other throw Elizabeth and replaces her with a catholic monarch. In this essay i am going to explain why the armada failed by looking at the difference between the Spanish and English and how these affected the outcome of the conflict.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Philip II of Spain was murdered on September 1, 1598, although there were many suspects from all over the world, a few stood out and were connected to each other. During the time of King Philip II’s reign, Spain was in an ongoing power struggle with another powerful country, England. Due to the power struggle, Philip and Queen Elizabeth of England weren’t on good terms, constantly trying to invade the other’s country, in order to rise as the most powerful country of Europe. Just a few years before the death of Philip, on August 8th, 1558, the Spanish Armada took place, where he wanted to send a fleet of 130 ships, in order to take over England and make them completely Catholic, once again. However, the Spanish fleet was defeated and Elizabeth…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spain is the most powerful monarchy in Europe and the Americas, wished to enrich themselves with the New World’s natural resources. They were not interested in creating a permanent society in the New World. Rather, they came for instant wealth, preferably in gold.…

    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many rulers used absolutism in their countries. They believed rulers should have complete control over the country. Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be feared and thought that the only way people would listen to him was if he was mean and scary. He thought if he was nice and loved then they would not fear him and end up taking advantage of him. (doc1) King James also believed absolutism was the way to go. He believed in divine right and that it was the only way to keep the country in order. He thought that kings were like gods and had the power to create or destroy anything that they thought was ineffective.(doc 2) Another person who believed in absolutism was Thomas Hobbes. He believed that people were naturally cruel unless controlled strictly by law. He said that to escape the brutish life people entered into a social contract which was an agreement by which they gave up the state of nature for an organized society. He also supported the Stuart kings in their struggle against parliament.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter The Great Peter the great was born in russia in russia on June 9th 1672. Peter the Great was the 14th child of Czar Alexis by his second wife, Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina. ( Biography.com) He joined his brother Ivan V in 1682 ruling russia together until the death of his brother in 1696. Peter was then declared Sovereign of all Russia.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many monarchs, particularly those of European descent, employed the flourishing absolutist philosophy during their reign in the seventeenth century. Defined as the "absolute or unlimited rule usually by one man," absolutism is virtually equivalent to the philosophy of despotism. A ruler incorporating the absolutist philosophy has complete control of his subjects and the highest authority with which to govern. With origins dating back to the Ancient Greeks, absolutism found root in some of Aristotle's theories: "Aristotle despotic government (nearly convertible with tyrannical) is that of a single ruler that rules, not for the public good but for his own." And from Roman political theory "regarding the power of the monarch, there had survived, particularly, a legacy of ideas associated with the position and prestige of a ruler which greatly strengthened the power of a dynasty.” Based on this Greek foundation in Aristotelian thought and Roman political theory, absolutism rose in other schools of philosophy as it gained prominence in the political world.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The marriage between Mary and Philip which he viewed to be entirely political and leaving Mary to defer heavily on Philip allowed him to also enjoy titles and honours for as long as their marriage should last. All official documents, including acts of parliament were to be dated with both their names, parliament was to be called under the joint authority of the couple and coins were to show the heads of both Mary and Philip. As well as Philip as a figure receiving authority in England, other advantages also lead to Spain being able to use England for Spanish interests. Involving England in the Hapsburg-Valois conflict, they made England into a ‘submissive satellite around the Hapsburg power’; this finally led to the loss of precious Calais for England after there was limited assistance in defence of Calais. Philips coincidental investment in the English navy led to huge advantages as he could…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays