Preview

Why Is The English Civil War Necessary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
649 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The English Civil War Necessary
The first time an English king was ever executed in public occurred during the time of the English Civil War. The English Civil War was a sequence of disagreements between Parliamentarians and Royalists in the country of England, that lasted until 1651. Students, communities, and society will benefit from understanding the importance of the war. The English Civil War is important because it led to the limitation of power, brought new religious ideas, and effected modern democracy. Many claim that the Great Rebellion is unnecessary to learn about because the conflict between Parliamentarians and Royalists was not a big enough problem for the cause of a war. However, their conflict was immense and if this war never happened then the world would not have the modern systems of government and democracy it has to this day.
Obviously, The English Civil War is necessary.
To begin with, it led to the limitation of power. When Charles I called a new Parliament, it quickly passed laws to limit his powers, asserts The English Civil War and Glorious Revolution. The cause of Charles’ actions made the Parliament angry and they thought no ruler should have such
…show more content…
Charles and the Archbishop of Canterbury, wanted to make the Church of England more elaborate (more decorations, statues, etc.), disputes The English Civil War. With new ideas being brought, protestants were becoming even more worried because protestant churches were simple. Although it worried some, many were happy for new ideas being announced. Charles I forced new religious ideas on individuals in England and Scotland which resulted in revolt, comments The English Civil War. Although Charles angered Scotland and England, new religions brought new ideas and with those ideas many English individuals could understand different religious beliefs. With these new religious ideas, English individuals were angered but mostly pleased of the new religious content being

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    APUSH Ch

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The one main cause of the Glorious Revolution in England was James II. He aggravated many political authorities in England and rejected all their advice. When James II’s Catholic wife had a son, the parliament had to do something in fear of another Catholic heir to the throne. They didn’t want another James II, and that was in store unless the rebelled. Protestant bishops and parliamentary leaders in the Whig party led the rebellion, backed up by the majority of the people and the military. This resulted in James’ daughter to his first wife to be queen and her husband to be King. This was William of Orange and Mary. They, forced, gave the Whig party more power and created a constitutional monarchy. The rebellion in America was similar, because the one in England sparked it. Puritan leaders and military seized their governor, Andros, and sent him back to England, mainly for his strong support of following the English Church. The poor farmers, whose prices were falling, were tired of being taxed by Catholic officials. This resulted up in the Dominion of England to be broken up. This included the King appointing government officials, land-owning men to vote, and no Puritan restrictions on the Church of England.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When King Charles I dismissed Parliament in 1629, he was set on the idea of a personal rule without any help from Parliament. This he could manage, as long as he avoided war. His aim was to sort out the country's finances, and with the help of Strafford and Laud, impose a 'Policy of Thorough'. This policy was the idea of a fair and paternalistic government with no corruption. However, within 11 years, Charles' personal rule had failed and England was drifting into war. There are mixed opinions on whether this failure was solely due to the actions of the King, or those of third parties, for example, Strafford or Laud.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles’s led the country without calling parliament for 11 years from 1629 – 1640. He initiated personal rule for many reasons. Firstly his close relationship with Buckingham alienated Parliament and caused resentment by Parliament. Secondly Charles had very strong believed in divine right and therefore saw no need for Parliament. Furthermore Charles religious policy’s led many to believe of a Catholic Conspiracy, which further distanced the King from Parliament. Lastly the King wasn’t getting substantial financial help from Parliament and decided that he would try and raise the finance without him.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charles the First became king in England, (also in Scotland) in 1625. He caused many problems with the Parliament because he believed in absolute monarchy. At one point Parliament limited Charles The First's power and he went along with a petition they had made but soon dismissed the Parliament.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His childhood left a mark on Charles's behaviour as king. Like James he was a believer in the divine right of kings. Unlike James, he was absolutist and tried to put it into practice. Given his belief in divine right, he saw all parliaments privileges as being subject to the approval of the monarch, not as liberties that had existed without the judgement of the monarch. Also unlike James He saw all criticism and anyone who questioned him as disloyal. An example of these in combination is when Charles I dissolved parliament because he was being criticized by Parliament as he felt he didn't need them as long as he could avoid war. This began the 11 year period known as the Personal Rule where he ran the country through royal prerogative instead of in cooperation with parliament.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 4 Focus Questions

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the Glorious Revolution, King James II was overthrown and replaced with his daughter, Mary, and her husband, William. This change showed the power of the elected representatives over the monarch. The colonies of North America believed this was how it should be, and pretty much the Glorious Revolution confirmed the colonists' beliefs that there should be limited monarch power, and a strong representative government. The English Bill of Rights that followed the Glorious Revolution also had massive influence on the colonies.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They made him agree to not imprison subjects with out cause and not levy taxes without Parliament's consent. Charles did not follow these agreements. Charles offended the puritans by trying to have both kingdoms follow one religion, so the puritans rebelled.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Charles I and James I tried to rule without parliament’s consent, but parliament’s control at the time was so great that neither Charles nor James were able to successfully decrease its role in English government. In the Bill of Rights, it is declared by parliament that certain actions are illegal without consent of parliament. For example, “The king’s supposed power of suspending laws without the consent of parliament is illegal” (James Madison). The English were not ready to give all the power of government to a single person because they had been under the combined rule of both the king and the assembly for such an extended time. Parliament, where members could be elected and changed as necessary, as opposed to an absolute monarch with no restraints, was supported by land-owning nobles and merchants. In 1642, differences between parliament and Charles I sparked England's civil war, which was partially caused by the refusal of parliament to give up their power in government and partly by royal stubbornness to share control of the country. This was the chief turning point for absolutism in England. Beginning with Charles II, monarchs realized the amount of power Parliament had and knew that instead of working against one another, they had to work with each other. Since parliament was so centralized and so stalwartly entrenched into the…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1547 and 1559 England was faced with numerous rebellions in response to the changes in regimes. During Somersets protection of Edward VI there was a major rebellion due to Somerset introducing the Act of Uniformity 1549 which lead to the creation of the new Book Of Common Prayer. This is known as the Western Rebellion, this caused major problems for Somerset as it showed that the majority of the people were against his regimes and wanted the country to remain Catholic, therefore this shows that England was torn apart by religious revolutions because if Somerset would have not tried to reverse the laws of Catholism the rebellion would have never happened. Another rebellion that was caused by religion was Wyatts rebellion, even though the main motive for this rebellion was due to her marriage to Phillip II of Spain many of the Wyatts urban supporters came from Maidstone which was a Protestant stronghold. Also the rising only occurred in the South which is evidence that it could have been religiously motivated as the majority of the South were Protestants and the Northerners where Catholics. Consequently this proves that England was torn apart by religious…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War was a really important moment in America. It led to the death of 700,000 American’s, and changed the course of American history forever. It also, ended slavery forever in the United States. There were many causes that led to this pivotal moment in history. The main causes of this war were: the 1850 Compromise, the Fugitive Slave Act, Dred Scott’s Decision, and John Brown’s Raid.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War was an very important historical event because it shows that the world can be a…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was multiple methods that could have been applied to prevent turmoil and chaos from happening, this could prevented the American Revolution. However, the American Revolution was inevitable, the amount of abuse that was inflicted on the people from the king himself took the basic liberties away from their society which soon led to the uprising. Also the ignorance that came from the political figures and parliament fueled the fire that was within the colonists, they finally took back what was rightfully theirs. Therefore, led to the colonists claiming rights back through the justice of the American Revolution.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most significant cause of the American Civil War was the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln. Because of Abraham Lincoln’s views on slavery, the emancipation proclamation, and the formation of different parties, the Civil War began. With Lincoln’s views opposed to slavery, it caused a lot of disagreement with some of the states. Abe believed that blacks should have equal rights, and that they should be treated the same as everyone else. He tried to stop the spreading of slavery and to try to put an end to it all together. He released a document called the Emancipation Proclamation. In it, he gives several million slaves freedom. He aims the document towards the south. It did…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The time period in history that I am most interested in learning more about is The Civil War. I would like to learn more about this time period because it was one of the most defining moments in American history. This time period is interesting to me because of all the implications that the Civil War would have on the future of America. This was a moment when our nation was divided between the North and the South and led to a war. The way our nations leaders responded to the division North and the South and how they affected the future of every American citizen. I would like to know more about Confederate Leaders and the goals they wanted for the future of the nation. Did our leaders have intentions of reuniting the country at any time after the war? Regardless…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays