Why Robbery Declined From 1960-2012?
Answer to Question 1
a. What is the trend of murder 1960-2012?-The rate of murder over the years remained fairly constant and only slight changes were reported. The rate of murder in 1960 is almost equal to that in 2012.
b. How can one explain the trend of Forcible Rape? - From the 1960s up to 1990 the rate of forcible started going down. This is attributable to the increase in police vigilance, community police, and the possible increase in the jail terms for forcible rape.
c. How can one explain the trend of Property Crimes? -The rate of property crimes was on an increasing trend from the 1960s to the 1990s, and then it started to drop. This is because, in the 1990s, most property owners realized the importance of putting up security measures to keep away criminal offenders; this helped to reduce the rates of property crimes reported to the police. Additionally, huge cities adopted tougher law enforcement practices, which deterred criminal activities.
d. Offer an explanation for why Robbery declined from 1960-2012. -Robbery declined for the several reasons, including the increase in community policing and police crackdowns. Additionally, the rate of victimization is much higher than the rate of crimes reported to the police. Hence, …show more content…
it is highly likely that the crime rates dropped because of a reduction in the number of victims who reported to the police.
Answer to Question 2 The rate of violent crimes in 1960 was 160 and it rose steadily all the way to 1990. In 1990, the violent crimes rate stood at 730. After 1990, the rate stated going down gradually and by 2012, it had reached 387, a number that is close to the 1970 rate.
Answer to Question 3 From the details provided on the situation the family is facing, it is obvious that the parent of the children cannot afford to take care of her kids. She does not have sufficient income to provide the basic needs of her children. Hence, the only way that the children can be taken care of is the using state resources. However, there is a problem with this as the politicians have canceled rental subsidy. Moreover, in order to make sure that the children are not separated from their parents, the best option would be to attend to shelters that help the unfortunate families. There are many shelters provided for unfortunate families, which are funded by the government. The families, who are enrolled in those programs, would be able to access a place to sleep when they cannot acquire a place on their own. This will ensure that the parents are not separated from their families. Additionally, the shelters will be cost effective as they will not be permanent, and any family that manages to afford their own shelter, they will not be eligible for the government shelter anymore. The plan would save cost and also prevent the children from the trauma they face when they are separated from their parents.
Answer to Question 4 From the piece of the Congress legislation provided in the instructions, it is clear that the focus of the legislation is the welfare of the children. In all the points, it is seen that the importance of marriage and responsible parents is solely for the purpose of the children. Hence, the Congress is trying to solve the problems children from broken homes face. As a result, trauma, low self-esteem and a sense of insecurity are some of the effects of a child growing up in a broken home. Therefore, with the legislation, the government aims to promote marriages and the family institution in general for the sake of the children.
Answer to Question 5 As seen in the statistics, the number of children in need of relief and benefits has been rising steadily over the years. This increase the number of children who are poor enough to access benefits is attributable to the increase in the number of broken families in the country. Over the years, more children are born out of marriage and others encounter a situation where their parents are separate. Many single parents face challenges when raising a child by themselves, prompting the children to seek relief and benefits from the government. Over the years, the cost of living has also risen steadily. The increase in the cost of living has not been accompanied by higher revenues for households (Reiman and Leighton, 2015). Therefore, raising children has become more expensive.
Answer to Question 6
a.
Based on the rational model of policy analysis, the government can come up with various solutions to counter the HIV/Aids pandemic. When it comes to reducing new infections, the most rational decision is to introduce vaccines to protect people against Aids. Likewise, the clinical trials for the vaccines should continue so that a working sample can be tested as soon as possible ("Office of AIDS Research OAR, Strategic Plan", 2018). Moreover, in order to improve the disease outcomes for HIV-infected individuals, the people who are already infected should be provided with antiretroviral drugs and other medications. Additionally, the government should ensure that the medication is free to warrant that even the poor people access
them.
b. When it comes to the incremental model of policy analysis, the government should focus on creating awareness on the importance of traditional sexual relations, church practices, and virtues to reduce infections. Moreover, in order to reduce the HIV disparities, morality should be encouraged in the society and other relevant authorities like community organizations. Also, churches should be involved to cater for the conservative people in the community.
c. When using the elite theory model of policy analysis, the government should first educate the elite people in the community and the once the new values are learned, the common folks will adopt them. Moreover, the new ways of preventing the spread of the disease is by the use of condoms, and other potential alternatives such as possible vaccines should be encouraged. After a while, the common people will also follow the behavior of the elite group.
a. What is the trend of murder 1960-2012?-The rate of murder over the years remained fairly constant and only slight changes were reported. The rate of murder in 1960 is almost equal to that in 2012.
b. How can one explain the trend of Forcible Rape? - From the 1960s up to 1990 the rate of forcible started going down. This is attributable to the increase in police vigilance, community police, and the possible increase in the jail terms for forcible rape.
c. How can one explain the trend of Property Crimes? -The rate of property crimes was on an increasing trend from the 1960s to the 1990s, and then it started to drop. This is because, in the 1990s, most property owners realized the importance of putting up security measures to keep away criminal offenders; this helped to reduce the rates of property crimes reported to the police. Additionally, huge cities adopted tougher law enforcement practices, which deterred criminal activities.
d. Offer an explanation for why Robbery declined from 1960-2012. -Robbery declined for the several reasons, including the increase in community policing and police crackdowns. Additionally, the rate of victimization is much higher than the rate of crimes reported to the police. Hence, …show more content…
it is highly likely that the crime rates dropped because of a reduction in the number of victims who reported to the police.
Answer to Question 2 The rate of violent crimes in 1960 was 160 and it rose steadily all the way to 1990. In 1990, the violent crimes rate stood at 730. After 1990, the rate stated going down gradually and by 2012, it had reached 387, a number that is close to the 1970 rate.
Answer to Question 3 From the details provided on the situation the family is facing, it is obvious that the parent of the children cannot afford to take care of her kids. She does not have sufficient income to provide the basic needs of her children. Hence, the only way that the children can be taken care of is the using state resources. However, there is a problem with this as the politicians have canceled rental subsidy. Moreover, in order to make sure that the children are not separated from their parents, the best option would be to attend to shelters that help the unfortunate families. There are many shelters provided for unfortunate families, which are funded by the government. The families, who are enrolled in those programs, would be able to access a place to sleep when they cannot acquire a place on their own. This will ensure that the parents are not separated from their families. Additionally, the shelters will be cost effective as they will not be permanent, and any family that manages to afford their own shelter, they will not be eligible for the government shelter anymore. The plan would save cost and also prevent the children from the trauma they face when they are separated from their parents.
Answer to Question 4 From the piece of the Congress legislation provided in the instructions, it is clear that the focus of the legislation is the welfare of the children. In all the points, it is seen that the importance of marriage and responsible parents is solely for the purpose of the children. Hence, the Congress is trying to solve the problems children from broken homes face. As a result, trauma, low self-esteem and a sense of insecurity are some of the effects of a child growing up in a broken home. Therefore, with the legislation, the government aims to promote marriages and the family institution in general for the sake of the children.
Answer to Question 5 As seen in the statistics, the number of children in need of relief and benefits has been rising steadily over the years. This increase the number of children who are poor enough to access benefits is attributable to the increase in the number of broken families in the country. Over the years, more children are born out of marriage and others encounter a situation where their parents are separate. Many single parents face challenges when raising a child by themselves, prompting the children to seek relief and benefits from the government. Over the years, the cost of living has also risen steadily. The increase in the cost of living has not been accompanied by higher revenues for households (Reiman and Leighton, 2015). Therefore, raising children has become more expensive.
Answer to Question 6
a.
Based on the rational model of policy analysis, the government can come up with various solutions to counter the HIV/Aids pandemic. When it comes to reducing new infections, the most rational decision is to introduce vaccines to protect people against Aids. Likewise, the clinical trials for the vaccines should continue so that a working sample can be tested as soon as possible ("Office of AIDS Research OAR, Strategic Plan", 2018). Moreover, in order to improve the disease outcomes for HIV-infected individuals, the people who are already infected should be provided with antiretroviral drugs and other medications. Additionally, the government should ensure that the medication is free to warrant that even the poor people access
them.
b. When it comes to the incremental model of policy analysis, the government should focus on creating awareness on the importance of traditional sexual relations, church practices, and virtues to reduce infections. Moreover, in order to reduce the HIV disparities, morality should be encouraged in the society and other relevant authorities like community organizations. Also, churches should be involved to cater for the conservative people in the community.
c. When using the elite theory model of policy analysis, the government should first educate the elite people in the community and the once the new values are learned, the common folks will adopt them. Moreover, the new ways of preventing the spread of the disease is by the use of condoms, and other potential alternatives such as possible vaccines should be encouraged. After a while, the common people will also follow the behavior of the elite group.