Why Was It Able To Collapse Of The Soviet Union?

In practice, collective security was mostly dependent on the Council because only their permanent members possessed the political, economic and military power to intervene decisively. Unfortunately, the Council excluded great powers like Germany on the basis of it being the loser in the First World War, the Soviet Union because of its communist government and the United States whorefused to join. The composition of the Council was also criticized as a victors’ club in Germany, a capitalist club by the Soviet Union and a European club by others in the world. It did not help that the Council’s permanent members were given the responsibility to govern the former enemy colonies as mandates, which reinforced the imperialist label they carried.
Moral persuasion was no deterrence for warlike countries. Moreover, the whole investigation procedure took so long that an aggressor’s action could become a fait accompli(). The Council was weakened by the Article 10 where it could only advise on the response to international aggression, which in itself was not defined by the League’s Covenant. Even if an aggressor had been identified, the Council members were unwilling to impose economic sanctions as they feared that non-members like the United States would take advantage to fill the vacuum. Finally, the Covenant was ambiguous about when and how military forces were to be used and countries were unwilling to contribute if their interests were not directly
Its economy was the strongest; it had the biggest navy and air force and possessed the atomic monopoly. Due to its experience with the Second World War, it was abandoning its traditional isolationist foreign policy in favour of internationalism.

Britain

Though Britain had the biggest empire in the world, the Second World War had severely indebted the country which weakened its ability to sustain such global commitments. However, it was also determined to maintain its leading position in