Preview

Why We Should Always Follow Moral Integrity

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
183 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why We Should Always Follow Moral Integrity
Moral obligation and integrity is a key issue in this question. Philosophers such as … argue that moral obligation is the strongest obligation we have; it is up to the individual to know if their actions are morally correct or not. This means that we should always follow our moral obligation and if the law acts against this, one should follow their moral obligation. This is because it could be seen as a restriction on freedom if one cannot follow their moral beliefs. King (1963) states that “an unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law” suggesting that moral obligation is the highest form of obligation and one must always follow it. For example, one has a moral obligation to know that to kill is wrong; obligation to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Xmgt 216 Appendix B

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | |to Merriam-Webster Encyclopedia |moral obligation” (“Deontological Ethics,”|moral agent as a driving force for ethical |…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Passing the thirteenth amendment enabled Abraham Lincoln to successfully save the Union and the republic. The primary tension regarding slavery grew from two different readings of the Constitution. The Confederacy believed slaves could be treated as property, whereas the Union believed in “‘we the people’, not we the white people” (347). Douglass explains how certain measures in the Constitution should have been disregarded after the slave trade was abolished.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are just laws and there are unjust laws. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obligations of Integrity

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case was based on George Tenet and the decisions he made within the CIA, successful and unsuccessful. Tenet served under the Clinton and Bush administrations from 1997-2004. During the Clinton administration, his main focus was to rebuild the CIA from its lack of morale and budget issues. Surprisingly (in my opinion because of his lack of experience), he was successful in the beginning process of rebuilding. Unfortunately for him, after Bush was elected the 9/11 attacks happened and his success started to decline. The decisions he made during the Bush administration and his lack of focus led to the demise of the DCI and the weakening of the CIA. I think his popularity during the Clinton administration got to his head and he just got sloppy during the Bush administration, but his decisions tremendously affected the way CIA is run today.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics, Morality, and Integrity all have some of the same elements that defines a person character. Being trustworthy leads to other elements of integrity. Such as, helping to better the community and respecting authority as a Parole Officer shows honesty. Being fair is another element which shows integrity. How can you be a Parole Officer, but doesn`t treat everyone equally? Third, being able to take responsibility for your own actions and personal growth as a Parole Officer shows integrity, as well. If you basically blame all of your failures and lack of progress on others around you then that shows your character and you cannot exhibit integrity with others and your career if you cannot be honest to yourself. Ethics as a Parole Officer could…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “One may well ask: How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others? The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but, a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” – Martin Luther King, Jr.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    MORAL OBLIGATIONS Legal obligations are clear cut line between what is right and what is wrong in the world, however there are many grey areas. Since no one judicial system can define all the grey areas in the world were are left to decide what is right and what is wrong using our moral compass. Some moral compasses are sounder than others but moral obligations are our unwritten duties to do or not to do something based on inner beliefs.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Value and Integrity

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The OEIG is responsible for ensuring and maintaining integrity in state government, please explain what integrity means to you and how your skills and/or experiences will help this office achieve its mission. Please attach the statement to your application.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Synthesis Essay

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moral obligations can be seen a variety of different ways, depending on the person. Some may think it is a person’s moral obligation to submit to a law even if they believe the law is wrong. Others think the opposite, if a person believes something is unjust why would they follow it. Everyone has a different point of view and after reading The Scarlet Letter by Hawthorne, The Letter from Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr., Laws Scarlet Letter by Korobkin and Lyceum Address by Lincoln, it is important to follow ones conscience. This may seem unjust, but is it just to support an unjust law? This is where the controversy comes in, and why after reading these three types of literature, the idea of supporting something unjust is completely wrong and breaks down the justice system.…

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nevertheless, not all laws are founded in morals, in many instances it’s just a matter of power. After all, everything Adolf Hitler did was legally permitted. Laws are not always ethically justified, therefore, one has the moral obligation to challenge it. As Elie Wiesel stated, “There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of advancing up the corporate ladder, your primary ethical principle can be seen in many ways. The utilitarianism approach would be my primary approach because it suits the overall goal of not only the company you work for, but any company in general. Having everyone on board for the main focus and understanding should picture the ethical standards that the company demands for their employees, and themselves. Abiding by these ethical standards, not only helps the company move forward, but you as an employee as well. There are cons to this principle however, in that not all co-workers can work together as an unit effectively.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “One may well ask: ‘How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?" The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question 1. What do the principles of integrity, character, and ethics mean to you? Describe someone (they can be anyone, real or fictional) whom you believe embodies these principles. (200-300 words)…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, Individuals have inalienable rights inherent to being human that every person therefore possesses that cannot be taken away by government or another entity the law has a duty to protect all members in society and their rights, but for whatever reason if the law goes against ones’ human rights then that individual has a right to break the law. Dr. King states how “One may well ask, how can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others? The answer is found in the fact that there are two types of laws: there are just and there are unjust laws”. I would agree with Augustine that “An unjust law is no law at all. Any law that uplifts human personality is just.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Importance of Ethics

    • 3331 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Aristotle was one of the first and perhaps most influential of all people to shape the ethics of Western civilization from a secular orientation. He believed that every type of animal has a common essence or nature, and that human beings are essentially, or by nature, rational. He viewed rationality as the central and most significant trait distinguishing humankind from other creatures. Further, Aristotle taught that the good person is the one who lives most rationally and whose moral judgments and social conduct are born of contemplation and reason, in contrast to spontaneity and emotionality. Today, when we address a moral dilemma by saying, "Let us use reason; let us use logic; let us think rationally about this," we are being ethical in the Aristotelian, secular tradition.[i]…

    • 3331 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays