Preview

Why I believe in God

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1994 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why I believe in God
Does God exist? Some say that the Earth and the life on it was just a product of random chance, and not created by any intelligent deity. Others say that it couldn’t have occurred simply by random chance, and it must have been created by an intelligent Creator. I agree with the latter statement, and am writing this to articulate some of the reasons behind why I believe in God.
Atheism is sometimes portrayed as being more logical than believing God created the universe, but I think that belief in God, or Theism, is at least equally logical, and perhaps more logical than Atheism. I will be presenting three arguments supporting belief in God: the Scientific Argument, the Moral Argument, and the Practical Argument.

The Scientific Argument* I think a very strong argument in favor of Theism is the development of life on Earth. Many Atheists believe that life was created from inorganic matter through the random process of molecules interacting together, and that over time, the random combinations of molecules formed different parts of a cell, which then combined to form one cell, which all life on Earth is descended from. However, I think this is a weak argument when you consider how vastly complex a cell is. Within each cell, there are microscopic cellular “machines” called organelles. Each organelle serves a purpose, whether it be constructing proteins, generating energy for the cell, or storing food and waste. If a cell was missing just one of its essential organelles, the cell would die. Each organelle is made up of a multitude of molecules, and it seems that it would be very difficult for even one functional organelle to be produced from inorganic matter randomly bonding, let alone every single one of the organelles a cell needs to survive. It seems logical to conclude that the odds of a fully functional cell developing from inorganic matter are incredibly unlikely if it is merely the product of random chance. Another argument

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Starting off, the atheistic view of the beginning of the universe occurring by chance is irrational and irreverent in many ways. The thought of the universe just existing from no cause, let alone not a personal cause is just illogical. This universe has a contingency for God and the Kalam cosmological argument proves this. The Kalam cosmological argument is a well-organized argument for God that has been developed from Muslim philosophers al-Kindi and al-Ghazali, and has been reinvented by philosopher William Lane Craig. The Kalam argument is very simple and straightforward. It is dealt with as a series of dilemmas. Those dilemmas starts with since the universe exists, is there a beginning or no beginning, is that beginning caused or uncaused, and is that cause personal or impersonal. The first premise states that whatever begins to exist as a cause. This premise if very logical and denying it is only possible to have things come from a cause is counterintuitive. The second premise of the Kalam cosmological argument states that universe began…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a theist wanted to argue against the inductive argument for atheism, then the theist must attack the first premise of the argument. There are three ways to go about this. The first way is arguing that the premise is defective in some way; however, there is a problem: this this can only be accomplished either by arguing that the reasons supporting premise one are in themselves insufficient to justify accepting it, or by arguing that there are other things we know which, conjoined with these reasons, do not justify us in accepting it. But since the argument is valid and premise two is likely to be accepted by the theist, this commits the theist to the view that premise one is actually false, not just that we lack a good reason to accept it. The next option a theist has to combat the first premise…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It goes without question, that human beings will always question the existence of “God”. Whether these questions are formed in support or denial of an omnipresent creator they are important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”, cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teleological Argument

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The origin of life has been explained in terms of natural processes, but evidence of intelligent design is expressed by the mere fact that the universe allows life to exist above all other notions. It is still possible to sustain teleological arguments in light of modern scientific principles mainly because of the formation of right conditions to allow life. It is very unlikely that this happens by chance presenting evidence of an intelligent and supernatural being to produce life. Scientific discoveries show how complex and sensitive various conditions need to be for the origin of life for the universe (McGrath, 2010). The universe seems to have been fine-tuned from its inception to produce life on earth. Slight alterations of physical and cosmological quantities in nature would result to an imbalance that would destroy the existence of…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Classical Theistic Conception of God states that there is a unique intelligent being that created the universe and that being is wholly perfect, omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-benevolent. In connection with the question of whether belief in a being that satisfies this definition is ever grounded in evidence and argument there are three arguments to consider. These three arguments are the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, and the teleological argument. Each provides separate ideas in proving the existence of a being that satisfies the Classical Theistic Conception of God.…

    • 751 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not believe that it is possible to “prove” the existence of God in the scientific sense. However, based on the arguments reviewed in favor of the rationality of God, I can enumerate reasons to believe that God exists and is active in the universe.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theistic argument that I think is most plausible is the Cosmological Argument. I think this because to me this is the only argument that is plausible because things do not exist without a cause. For example, people and animals do not exist without reproduction. People must have a first cause to be created and exist. “The cosmological argument for God’s existence goes like this: The world could not exist on its own so there must have been a first cause that brought it into being.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    is god real

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Take virtually any aspect of our natural world that we don't fully understand (or that both the theist and his audience are not well-informed on), and you'll find a someone claiming God is at the end of that dimly-lit tunnel. Why is there cancer? What causes HIV? Why do people die? Why do bad things happen to good people? Why did that tsunami wreck Indonesia? How did the Red Sox win the World Series? It's God's will. What is the meaning of life? To serve God. Why should we act morally? Because God says so. How did so-and-so survive that horrible accident unscathed? It was a miracle. How did life…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every time you step into a grocery store, you are surrounded by genetically modified food. Whether it’s a head of lettuce, or a chicken breast; unless you buy it with an organic label, it’s most likely genetically modified. Genetically modified organisms are defined as an organism whose characteristics have been altered using the techniques of genetic engineering. (Add Citation). The general principle of genetically modified organisms is to alter genetics on an organism’s genome. This is done by adding, deleting or mutating genetic material.(Add Citation). Adding DNA to an organism results in recombinant DNA. Recombinant DNA aresequences that result from the use of laboratory methods to bring together genetic material from other organisms, creating sequences that would not be found in biological organisms. The first recombinant model was created by Paul Berg. (Add Citation.) This paper will discuss the benefits, the risks and the controversy of genetically modified organisms.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Existence Of God

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When an atheist denies the existence of God, logic will often be uses as his means of reasoning and arguing his point. It is possible to state that logic so clearly demonstrates the existence of God, as a source of beginning and creation, but the matter of fact is that the Atheist has no reason to use logic at all, let alone deny the existence of God at all.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why I Believe in God

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I often used to ask myself in the past, “who created all conveniences for human existence? Why is the distance between the Sun and the Earth comfortable for living? Why is there a good proportion of water and land; why do we have mountains, beautiful nature, animals and plants? Why do we have brain, 2 eyes, 2 feet, and 2 hands? Sure, there’s somebody who regulates all these processes on the Earth to make people live. And His name is God. Blaise Pascal says, “A person should believe in God just in case He exists.” As I understand, he says belief in God’s existence means belief in Him. Yes, people had better believe in God, but it doesn’t mean if they don’t, they will go to hell.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    God Existence

    • 2548 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The existence of God is a subject matter that most people want to know the answer to. Many great philosophers have debated about this subject for generations. Feuerbach has an interesting point of view about the subject matter. Feuerbach believes that if it can be scientifically proven then it is real or true and anything that is not proven is not real because there are no facts to back it up. But I believe that anything is real or true if you have faith. Faith is faith. Rene Descartes is someone else that had discussions on the subject matter. Descartes wrote a book called “Meditations on First Philosophy” which talked about the existence of God and the distinction between the human soul and body. He’s basically address; do people have the power to control things that are unexplainable or can people do what they say God can do (if you feel that God doesn’t exist). He’s my supporter that God does existence. The point that I’m trying to make is that God is real. Ludwig Feuerbach is arguing in the essay “The Essence of Christianity” that God isn’t real because humans have construed their own personal view of him. I hope by the end of my essay that you understand the reasons why God is or isn’t real. Some people don’t believe in the Bible because the information in the bible is not scientifically proven. People feel it’s a made up story to get people to believe in how the world came about, what’s right, what’s wrong and other important quality’s in order to be the best human being.…

    • 2548 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Existence of God

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since the beginning of time people have often questioned the meaning of life, how the universe was created and the purpose for the wildlife and creatures that roam the earth. These things often lead us to question the existence of God. In order to even begin to answer these complex questions we must uncover the source of all of these occurrences. In this paper I will discuss the issue of Gods’ existence; present one basic dispute and clarify the arguments on multiple sides of this issue. I will structure an argument that supports the side of the issue I find to be better defended while explaining why I find my side of this debate stronger. In conclusion, I will state my own view and defend it with an argument. Does God exist or did the “Big Bang theory” or other natural theories play a role? Even though it is absolutely impossible to prove Gods’ existence, I personally believe that the presence of God is so evident that we do not need solid proof to verify that he is our creator.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays