Preview

Writing from Sources

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
791 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Writing from Sources
Writing from Sources When writing an academic paper it is difficult to use one’s own experiences as knowledgeable support, thus one must rely on resources from others. These sources are typically found in the written form, books, periodicals, journals, or even on the Web. If the source used is not valid the essay will not be credible. Consequently, it is imperative that each source is evaluated to determine its credibility (Spatt, 2011). This paper will induce that Wikipedia is not a credible source of information for academic writing as debated by Team A by presenting both sides of the debate, providing a complete account of the argument, citing support, and providing fair presentation through identifying the criteria used to evaluate credibility of sources. Prior to outlining Team A’s debate, it is important to note the criteria of an academic source. An academic source as stated in Writing from Sources 8th ed. (2011) must possess the following: credentials of the author, which includes specialization in the field or topic; impartiality, which includes keeping bias within reasonable limits; proper style and tone, which includes open-minded and purposeful approach; and currency, which includes relevance and up-to-date information. In addition, “academic sources are intended for a limited audience in the field. For example, an academic book is usually published by a university press and contains a level of scholarship and depth of analysis” (Spatt, 2011, p. 343). When it comes to the Web it is imperative to evaluate the source to meet these same academic criteria. One must inspect each site to make sure it is reliable before considering it as a reference. Learning Team A’s debate involved arguments for both why Wikipedia is a viable source for academic writing and why it is not. The arguments for using Wikipedia as a source cited Wikipedia.org stating it is a good starting place for research projects as it provides the basics of information on a topic,


References: Spatt, B. (2011). Writing from sources 8th Edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin 's. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (2012). en.wikipedia.org. Retrieved November 3, 2012, from Wikipedia:About: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Randall McClure’s essay “Googlepedia” assesses current students’ predominate approach to research-based writing, and uses realistic ways to push such approaches further. He does this by analyzing two of his students’ methods. Of the strategies his students use, perhaps the most effective is Edward’s use of Wikipedia as a leaping off point, before delving further and entering search terms into Google (230). This practice should be just the beginning of an in-depth research process. However, Edward’s successional use of search engines does provide a template for an ideal research process. In addition, although he does not go nearly in depth, he does include an assessment of the author’s credibility (229). More rigorous assessment could greatly…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I evaluate to determine whether a resource is a valuable source of information I look for currency and/or history of resource; identify the author’s authority; and informational bias.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    STurner Assignment Unit3

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a. Why are wikis, forums and blogs not considered valid sources for academic research? Minimum 50 words. I think that wikis, forums and blogs are not valid sources for academic research because these are all contributed to by regular people who base their input on their own opinions and findings, not by reading it or citing it from any type of academic text. These are all based on personal findings and not referenced to any type of reference book in any way.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In summary, the paper by the unknown author and by Brandon Jorritsma seems similar. But, the use of sources throughout the writing and their effects is what makes the two writings different. The use of sources adds evidence and support to writing while not using sources concludes that the information present is not reliable. Reliable sources are applied by quoting and paraphrasing. Furthermore, sources have the power to enhance writing by making it more persuasive in contrast to sources not enhancing writing by making it less…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    College students are taking advantage of these sites, and they are using them in a frowned-upon way. Talbot references many professors from prestigious universities to add evidence and credibility into her article. These professors give scientific studies or opinions on the subject, regarding what they think. Using both studies and significant opinions from professors, Talbot effectively includes more credibility into her…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classify each source of evidence as either a general information resource, a filtered resource, or an unfiltered resource.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is one of the most sought out information website. Jimmy Wales, founder says this about his website, “Wikipedia is something special…, it is a place we can all go to think, to learn and share our knowledge with others” (Wikipedia, 2012, p1). This resourceful tool has up-to-date news, press releases, and it provides its users with the convenience to various languages. In this paper team C will debate on supporting arguments for Wikipedia and opposing arguments if it is credible and a valid source of information.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The writer wrote this essay to warn fellow college students the dangers of using Wikipedia as an academic research source. No student wants to go through hours of studying and research for a paper and end up using incorrect information. Knowing this, the writer starts by discrediting Wikipedia…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Relevance: According to the research on citations of Wikipedia, Along with the increasing number of citations, another indicator that Wikipedia may be gaining respectability is its citation by well-known scholars. (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2008)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my studies at Ashford University, I have found writing papers fun and gained an enormous amount of knowledge through the research involved. However, I do not just jump on google and use the first Wikipedia page that pops up. These types of searches can obtain inaccurate information that can be an absolute waste of time. This is why I am extremely grateful to have access to the abundance of valid research available in the Ashford University (AU) library.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, a wealth of information is available at all times literally with just the touch of a button. To some, this ease of convenience is a blessing. For those who do not use proper discretion, the convenience is a curse. Due to the abundance of information located on the World Wide Web, students can pick and choose information at their leisure, without ever thinking about whether it is recognized as a scholarly document. With the swiftness that this information age has come upon us, some of our fundamental skills were somehow left behind. According to Russell (2009), a librarian who frequently meets with campus instructors to address any issues they may be having, professors worry that “students lack an understanding of what constitutes good-quality scholarly information” (p.92). In the field of education, particularly early education, teachers must not allow the information literacy to influence scholarship, practice or leadership in a negative manner, but instead embrace the potential information literacy possesses and take full advantage of teaching students a more responsible way to research, analyze, and apply their findings.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today in society, source credibility is becoming a bigger issue. Many people and students now a days find themselves in a predicament where credible sources are needed to help with research projects, essays, books etc. The internet is a big place and is filled with insane amounts of information for societies reach. The question is whether these sources are credible sources or just information filled in by average person with little experience or knowledge in the subject.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays