Yamasee Critique

The purpose of this article was to analyze the origins of the Yamasee War and to depict the reasoning for its occurrence by comparing various writers work. The researcher often mentions how little the war is recognized as one of the most important events in colonial history. In early 1712, Reverend LeJau made a remark that he felt “discomforted by “something cloudy in their looks”. This look apparently had a meaning stronger than it appeared. The Warriors from every tribe/ nation from the South had formed an alliance and were one of the strongest native coalitions to ever go against the British in North America. This strong force came extremely close to wiping out the European colonists. The war had created much controversy throughout South Carolina and was one of the strongest life threatening wars to the population. The dependence upon Native Americans became apparent with South Carolina’s “experimentation with Indian slavery”. The war caused an execution to “Indian slavery” and prompted African labor from 1715. The original efforts to discover the cause of the war focused mainly on the behavior of the English traders. “John R. Swanston, writing in the same decade, also felt that the “misconduct of some traders” had been the “immediate cause” of the war but went on to add that fears of enslavement may have prompted the Yamasees to action as well” This opinion has created an idea that this was the main cause of the war, but other writers and historians seem to feel otherwise. James Merrell, for example created a more logical discussion about the geography of South Carolina at the time as well as the misperceptions between the Yamasees and Europeans. Present studies bring forth the idea of the dependency theory. This idea changes the outlook of one of the possible causes of the war and can vouch for reasons why certain events occurred throughout the war. Some believe that dependency upon the Native Americans could have ignited the war. The cultural aspects of the