Preview

A Contrastive Linguistic Analysis of Inflectional Bound Morphemes of English, Azerbaijani and Persian languages: A Comparative Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7510 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Contrastive Linguistic Analysis of Inflectional Bound Morphemes of English, Azerbaijani and Persian languages: A Comparative Study
A Contrastive Linguistic Analysis of Inflectional Bound Morphemes of English, Azerbaijani and Persian Languages: A Comparative Study

Bahram Kazemian1 & Somayyeh Hashemi2

Abstract

This study aims at contrasting and comparing inflectional bound morphemes of English, Azerbaijani and Persian languages in details to pinpoint any similarities and differences between them. To do so, an inventory of Azerbaijani, Persian and English inflections with examples and illustrations are listed to highlight their similarities and discrepancies. There are restricted numbers of inflections in each language and are utilized to indicate aspects of grammatical function of a word. Results reveal that there are more varieties of inflections in Azerbaijani language than in English or Persian and; they share some common properties as well as several dissimilarities. English and Persian represent more irregularity in terms of plurality for nouns and affixation for verbs; Azeri incorporates numerous inflections into each category as well. The differences are the major source of difficulties for a native speaker of Azeri or Persian to learn English and vice versa. To overcome this, teaching should be effectively and efficiently managed at these different points to smooth the path for learners. Based on the findings of the study, some implications can be drawn for translators, textbook writers, syllabus designers, learners and instructors involved in language pedagogy.

Keywords: contrastive analysis, Azerbaijani and Persian languages, inflectional morphemes

Introduction

Contrastive analysis has been an essential and systematic branch of applied linguistics which deals with the linguistic description of the structure of two or more different languages.
Such descriptive comparison and contrast serve to show how languages differ in their sound system, grammatical structure and vocabulary. This type of analysis can be used in language teaching, translation, and of



References: Aarts, B. & Mcmahon, A. (2006). The handbook of English linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Ahranjani, A. K. (2011). Plural and singular form of noun in Azerbaijani and English languages. International Journal of Academic Research, 1(3), 156-166. Alimohammadi, M., & Khalili, H. (2006). General English. Tehran: Payam-e-Nour University. Bageri, M. (2002). Moqəddəmāte zəbānshenāsi. Tehran: Gatreh Publications. Brinton, L. J. (2000). The structure of modern English: A linguistic introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company. Ellis, R. (1989). Understanding second language acquisition. USA: Oxford University Press. Falk, J. S. (1998). Linguistics and language: A survey of basic concepts and applications. Xerox College Pub. Farzaneh, M. A. (1998). Məbāni-e- dəstür zəbān-e- Azerbaijani: Āsvāt və kəlemāt. Tehran: Farhang Publications. Fatemi, A. H., & Ziaei, S. (2012). A contrastive analysis of out-of-context translation of Farsi adjectives into English in EFL classrooms. International journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 211-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2202. Fisiak, J. (1971). Papers and studies in contrastive linguistics, Vol. 1. The Polish-English contrastive project. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University. Fisiak, J. (1974). Project for a contrastive analysis of the sound systems, grammar and lexicon of Polish and English. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University. Fisiak, J. (1985). Contrastive linguistics and the language teacher. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Fries, C. C. (1945). Teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Hadi, E. (1995). Torki Honər əst. Tabriz: Ahrar Publications. Hayati, M Householder, F. W., & Lotfi, M. (1965). Basic course in Azerbaijani. Bloomington: Indian University Press. James, C. (1989). Contrastive analysis. London: Longman. Khansir, A. A. (2012). Error analysis and second language acquisition. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(5), 1027-1032. Keshavarz, M. H. (2003). Contrastive analysis and error analysis. Tehran: Rahnama Publications. Krzeszowski, T. P. (1990). Contrasting languages: the scope of contrastive linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/~kilarski/courses/download/krzeszowski.pdf. Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Mace, J. (2003). Persian grammar: For reference and revision. New York: Routledge Curzon. Mashkur, M. J. (2009). Dəstur nam-e dər sərf və nəhv-e zəbān-e Farsi. Tehran: Shərq Publication Company. Salim, J Sajavaara, K. (1977). Contrastive linguistic past and present and a communicative approach. Finland: Jyvaskyla University. Spencer, A., & Zwicky, A. M. (2007). The handbook of morphology. Blackwell Publishing. Torabi, M. A. (2002). Azerbaijani and T. E. F. L.: A contrastive linguistic approach to T. E. F. L. to Azerbaijani bilinguals. Tabriz: Tabriz University Press. Trask, R. L. (1999). Language: The basics. Routledge Publishing Vazinpour, N Wardlaugh, R. (1970). The contrastive analysis hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 4. TESOL Convention March 1970. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586182. Yarmohammadi, L. (2002). A contrastive analysis of Persian and English: Grammar, vocabulary and phonology. Tehran: Payame Noor University Press. Yule, G. (2006). The Study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ziahosseiny, S. M. (1999). A contrastive analysis of Persian and English and error analysis. Tehran: Nashr-e Vira.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    DTTLS Assignments

    • 5208 Words
    • 149 Pages

    Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (1995). Grammar and spoken language. "Applied Linguistics, 16" (2), 141-158…

    • 5208 Words
    • 149 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adjective and Adverbs

    • 4069 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The subject matter of our term-paper is the comparative analysis of typological features of adjectives and adverbs in English and in Armenian.…

    • 4069 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Every language carries certain features that distinguish it from other languages although the languages descending from the same origin portray greater resemblances than the ones descending from different families, the similarities and differences are what make learning another language an easy task or an exhausting one. In the field of linguistics, the study of the internal structure of words- since words are the elements constructing any language and they are generally accepted as being the smallest units of any language syntax- is important; it is clear that in most (if not all) languages, words can be related to other words by rules and any language speakers can recognize the words and their relations from their tacit knowledge of the rules of word-formation. These rules are understood by the native speaker and reflect specific patterns in the way words are formed from smaller units and how those smaller units interact in speech. In this way, morphology is the branch of linguistics that studies patterns of word-formation within and across languages, and attempts to formulate rules that model the knowledge of the speakers and learners of these languages.…

    • 3579 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    phonetics vs. Phonology

    • 3360 Words
    • 11 Pages

    References: Bussmann, H. (1998). Routledge Dictionary of Lnaguage and Linguistics (G. P., Trauth & K., … …..Kazzazi, Ed. & Trans.). NY: Routledge.…

    • 3360 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    to be a native speaker in both the SL and TL, then he has to be…

    • 3976 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2011 Contrastive Analysis

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Chapter 1. The subject-matter of the contrastive lexicology of English and Ukrainian 1. Fundamentals 1.1. Object of lexicology. 1.2. Subdivisions of lexicology. 2. Tasks of contrastive lexicology. Its theoretical and practical value. The gift o…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Actuality of the problem. Just like Latin was the language meant to gather people as the Roman Empire went on its row of conquests all over Europe and later, during the Enlightenment Period, it was French, at this moment English has this function.…

    • 11455 Words
    • 46 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparative typology, • 5. Comparative grammar, • 6. Connotation grammar, • 7. Descriptive – comparative linguistics According to the notion of comparison of linguistics phenomenon and the aim directed on we may classify linguistic typology into the following parts • • • • a) genetic of genealogical typology, b) structural typology, c) areal typology d) comparative typology.…

    • 634 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theoretical English Grammar

    • 55261 Words
    • 222 Pages

    1 Vilnius Pedagogical University Department of English Philology Laimutis Valeika Janina Buitkiene An Introductory Course in Theoretical English Grammar Metodine mokymo priemone aukљtuju mokyklu studentams 2003 2 © Vilnius Pedagogical University, 2003 Leidinys svarstytas ir rekomenduotas spaudai Uћsienio kalbu fakulteto Anglu filologijos katedros posedyje 2003 03 12, protokolo Nr. 5 Leidinys svarstytas ir rekomenduotas spaudai Uћsienio kalbu fakulteto Tarybos posedyje 2003 03 13, protokolo Nr. 4 Recenzentai: doc. dr. Graћina Rosiniene, doc. dr. Daiva Verikaite.…

    • 55261 Words
    • 222 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In every language, words can be divided into several groups with its own labels. These labels are generally called parts of speech or word categories. Words in each category share a number of properties according to various criteria. These criteria include semantic (or notional), morphological, syntactic and phonetic ones. Providing relevant examples demonstrating similarities or distinctions, I will discuss the belonging (or not belonging) of examples in (1) to the same word category.…

    • 2245 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    English vs Hungarian

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    syllabus: particulars, course description, schedule: tentative, topics, consultation week about the course  a loose descriptive framework, some intro to linguistics – some notions and categories for basic generalizations (later: practical, descriptive, theoretical)  a new course – awareness of the similarities and differences between the target language and the mother tongue (learner, student, teacher) – reduced material  my perspective – goal: important, relevant, practically oriented, student-friendly  EXAM EXCLUSIVELY BASED ON THE LECTURES (no textbook yet) – attendance – lecture notes  ask questions!  handouts by themselves: NOT SUFFICIENT!  recommended readings: much more material, clarification, (further) background information – O’Grady et al. (1993): framework, English phenomena – Rounds (2001): a good comprehensive practical Hungarian grammar – page numbers: homepage  10 copies on reserve (+ Quirk et al. (1979) A University Grammar of English) on (the comparison of) languages  language is an articulated system of arbitrary signs – a complex system of subsystems  phonetics/phonology > morphology > syntax ↔ semantics  rule-governed (child, linguist, student) data → hypothesized rule → further data → modified hypothesized rule → further data → rule 1. went → *goed → went 2. *Is I can do it? 3. nonsense words: wug → wugs  all human languages have grammars with categories, principles and rules – (dis)similarities English vs. Hungarian …

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    English grammar summary

    • 1015 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2) Clause level: main clause, subclause, finite, non-finite, …3) Phrase level: noun phrase, adjective phrase, prepositional phrase, adverb phrase, …4) Word level: noun, lexical verb, (modal) auxiliary, demonstrative det., personal pronoun, …3.2 Function (or Functional) Categories…

    • 1015 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    PhD candidate

    • 9207 Words
    • 57 Pages

    and analyze nominalization and the role played by it. With a corpus of 10 authentic scientific…

    • 9207 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contrastive analysis

    • 1857 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This paper aimed to further describe with a proper explanation about the differences in Malay language and other language form that may be found different, thus the name contrastive analysis. Wrapping up this paper, two (2) paradigm found that explained the importance of contrastive analysis and the similarities as well as differences in Malay language with other languages, in this case English.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Critical Theory

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Saussure, Ferdinand De. “Course in General Linguistics”. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Leitch, Vincent B. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2010. 846-866. Print…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays