Ratifying the Constitution – A Document Based Question
The following packet contains all the information you will need to effectively answer the question:
What were the major arguments used by each side (the supporters and the opponents) in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution?
After reading and analyzing the documents in this packet, you will be asked to complete a four-paragraph essay answering the above question. By effectively analyzing the documents, you will have the tools you need to construct an effective compare and contrast type essay.
This document based question packet and essay will be worth 55 points. See the due dates and point breakdown below for more information
Document Based Questions Due Dates:
• Completed DBQ packet: Due Monday 11/19 (10 pts)
• Completed essay outline: Due Monday 11/26 (10 pts)
• Completed four paragraph essay: Due Monday 12/3 (35 pts – See Attached Rubric for details)
Tips and Tricks for writing good essays:
• Be sure to remember the tools you use in Writing Workshop and Language Arts
• Follow the rubric that is provided. Rubric will provide a guide for writing the best essay you can.
• Read your essay out loud after you complete it. Spell check does not catch everything so make sure you sufficiently edit/revise your own work.
• If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mangel Name: __________________________________________________ Period: _________ Date: _______________
Constitutional Convention DBQ Rubric
Category Exemplary
5 points Accomplished 4 Points Developing
3 points Beginning
2 points
Introductory Paragraph Paragraph introduces topic of essay and provides sufficient background information Paragraph introduces topic of essay and provides little background information Paragraph mentions topic of essay and provides little background information Paragraph does not introduce essay topic and provides no background information
Body Paragraph 1 Paragraph effectively presents information and maintains a strong focus Paragraph uses information fairly well and maintains a somewhat strong focus Paragraph contains little factual information and/or maintains a weak focus Paragraph does not present information well and maintains no focus
Body Paragraph 2 Paragraph effectively presents information and maintains a strong focus Paragraph uses information fairly well and maintains a somewhat strong focus Paragraph contains little factual information and/or maintains a weak focus Paragraph does not present information well and maintains no focus
Closing Paragraph Paragraph effectively restates the information from the intro paragraph and provides a good closing Paragraph somewhat restates the information from the intro paragraph and provides an adequate closing Paragraph does not restate information from the intro paragraph OR does not provide an adequate closing Paragraph does not restate information from the intro paragraph AND does not provide an adequate closing
Use of Documents Essay effectively uses documents to support statements made in paragraphs Essay uses some documents to support statements made in paragraphs Essay uses few documents to support statements made in paragraphs Essay uses no documents to support statements made in paragraphs
Category Exemplary
5 points Accomplished
4 Points Developing
3 points Beginning
2 points
Grammar and Style 0 -1 grammatical mistakes 2-3 grammatical mistakes 4-5 grammatical mistakes 6 or more grammatical mistakes
Neatness and Organization Paragraphs are well organized and transition well. Paragraphs are not well organized and do not transition into each other
Total Project Grade: ________/35 points
Name: _________________________________________ Period: ________ Date: __________________
Historical Context Today, over 200 years after it was written and ratified, most Americans think of the U.S. Constitution as something almost sacred. We assume that this great document has always been honored and revered. This is not true. When it was written in 1787 and submitted to the states for ratification, it set off months of fierce and often bitter debate. There were, of course, many who welcomed it as a stronger and more effective national government, which could successfully tie the 13 states together into a common nation. But others were fearful of this proposed powerful new national government. Only a few years earlier they had fought a war against a too powerful, distant central government. Why should they now erect a new distant central government which could threaten their liberties just as King George and Parliament had? The debate went on in towns and villages across the country for months. Some of the smaller states ratified the new Constitution quickly, but in most states the debate continued, hi February of 1788, the Massachusetts convention voted 187 to 168 to ratify the Constitution. In June, Virginia ratified, 89 to 79. New York followed almost immediately. Now, with the approval of 11 states, the new government was established. In April of 1789 George Washington was inaugurated President, even though two states still had not approved the Constitution. It took North Caro¬lina until November 1789 and Rhode Island until May 1790 to join the new government.
Directions: The following question is based on the accompanying documents (1-6). As you analyze the documents, take into account both the source of the document and the author's point of view. Be sure to:
1. Carefully read the document-based question. Consider what you already know about this topic. How would you answer the question if you had no documents to examine?
2. Now, read each document carefully, underlining key phrases and words that address the document-based question. You may also wish to use the margin to make brief notes. Answer the questions which follow each document.
3. Based on your own knowledge and on the information found in the documents, formulate a thesis that directly answers the question.
4. Organize supportive and relevant information into a brief outline.
5. Write a well-organized essay proving your thesis. The essay should be logically presented and should include information both from the documents and from your own knowledge outside of the documents.
Question: What were the major arguments used by each side (the supporters and the opponents) in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution?
Part A: The following documents address various arguments made in support of, or in opposition to, ratifying the U.S. Constitution. Examine each document carefully, and answer the question or questions that follow.
Document 1
This excerpt is from a newspaper, The Massachusetts Sentinel, October 20,1787.
Let us look and behold the distresses which prevail in every part of our country . . . the complaints of our farmers ... the complaints of every class of public creditors ... the melancholy faces of our working people . .. our ships rotting in our harbors ... the insults that are offered to the American name and character in every court of Europe. . . . View these things, fellow citizens, and then say that we do not require a new, a protecting, and efficient federal government if you can.
Why does the editor of this newspaper support ratifying the Constitution?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Document 2
This excerpt is from "Observations on the New Federal Constitution and on the Federal and State Conventions," by Mercy Otis Warren. It originally appeared as a newspaper article in the spring of 1788.
There is no security in the system [under the proposed new U.S. Constitution] either for the rights of conscience or the liberty of the press.. .. The executive and the legislature] are so dangerously blended that they give just cause for alarm. . . . There is no provision for a rotation nor anything else to prevent a political office from remaining in the same hands for life.
Why did Mercy Otis Warren oppose ratifying the Constitution?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Document 3
These excerpts are from a letter written by George Washington to John Jay, dated August 1,1786. In these lines, Washington is agreeing with Jay's criticism of the Articles of Confederation.
Your sentiments, that our affairs are drawing rapidly to a crisis, accord with my own. . . . We have errors to correct. We have probably had too good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation . . .
. . . thirteeen sovereign, independent, disunited States are in the habit of ... refusing compliance with [our national Congress] at their option.
Would to God, that wise measures may be taken in time to avert the consequences we have but too much reason to apprehend. . . .
What did Washington mean by saying "we have errors to correct?"
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
What do you suppose he meant by saying "we have probably had too good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Document 4
This excerpt is from a speech by Patrick Henry, a delegate to the Virginia State Constitutional Ratification Convention, given in June 1788.
. . . Here is a resolution as radical as that which separated us from Great Britain. It is radical in this transition; our rights and privileges are endangered, and the sovereignty of the states will be relinquished. . . . The rights of conscience, trial by jury, liberty of the press . . . are rendered insecure.
Why did Patrick Henry oppose the Constitution?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Document 5
This excerpt is from a speech by Amos Singletree, member of the Massachusetts Constitutional Ratifica¬tion Convention, given in January 1788.
These lawyers and men of learning, and monied men, that talk so finely and gloss over matters so smoothly, to make us poor illiterate people swallow down the pill, expect to get into Congress themselves . . . and get all the power and all the money into their own hands, and then they will swallow all us little folks . . .
Why did Amos Singletree oppose the Constitution?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Document 6
This excerpt is from a resolution from the Massachusetts Constitutional Ratification Convention, February 1788. This Convention approved the Constitution with a vote of 187 to 168.
... it is the opinion of this Convention that certain amendments and alterations in the said Constitution would remove the fears and quiet the apprehensions of many of the good people of the commonwealth [the resolution goes on to recommend such amendments as] . . . that all powers not expressly delegated by the . . . Constitution are reserved to the several states . . . that no person be tried for any crime . . . until he be first indicted by a grand jury . . .
What addition to the U.S. Constitution was suggested as a way to win the approval of many of its opponents?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
What were the major arguments used by each side (the supporters and the opponents) in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution?
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Please write a 1250-1500 word essay in response to the prompt stated below. In writing…
- 301 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There was opposition to the constitution because many mainly the anti-federalists believed it would turn into tyranny and everything that happened in the American Revolution and there steps towards a democracy would end and it would become like Britain. Therefore the war would mean nothing and democracy would not happen, the government would take over.…
- 647 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The major arguments in the debate over the ratification over the U.S Constitution were the rights of individuals verses the rights of the states, the supporters and the opponents, were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Both sides the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are debating to win the support of our nation.…
- 390 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Answers are to be presented academically with appropriate referencing using Harvard Style referencing system. Overall word count for this assignment is 1500-1800 words approximately.…
- 1218 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In 1786 an incident in Massachusetts caused many Americans to question the national government. The rebellion led by Daniel Shay worried many Americans especially the wealthy, the nation's leaders realized there was a need for a stronger central government. In May of 1787 delegates from 12 states met in Philadelphia with the purpose to revise the Articles of the Confederation. The Articles had many weaknesses one of its main weaknesses was the power that each individual state had, along with each states representation in Congress. This would be known as the Constitutional Convention, the delegates present were all came from the upper class of American Society they were well educated and wealthy. These men came together with the mission of making…
- 896 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When the U.S. constitution was made it there was a long debate over the ratification of the constitution. There were two sides in the debate, the Federalists, who were supporter of the new constitution, and were better, organized than their opponents, and the Federalists had the support of the most respected men in America, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin. The other side of the debate was the Antifederalists, who opposed ratification; although they weren’t as organized as the Federalists they did have some dedicated supporters. One major argument used by the supporters’ side in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. constitution is that there would be disorder without a strong central government.…
- 303 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The ratification of the Constitution was an immensely long process. After Shay’s Rebellion, delegates from twelve states met in Philadelphia, in order to strengthen the frail Articles of Confederation and create a new Constitution. Delegates met in Philadelphia’s Pennsylvania State House, for the Constitutional Convention, in which they discussed and debated the new Constitution. Many U.S. states and citizens argued over topics such as the congress’ power, slavery, and taxes, which highlighted the fact that the ratification debate proved that the country was more divided than united.…
- 1081 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
After years of struggling to break away from Britain the United States was finally victorious.…
- 216 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Forming this new country was a tough process. There were several different ideas. After realizing that the country was too weak under the Articles of Confederation. In result, there came a new idea; which was to ratify the Constitution. The procedures for ratifying the new Constitution were as controversial as its contents. This is where the fight to ratify the constitution began. The Anti-Federalists had many central arguments against the adoption of the Constitution. The proponents, the Federalist proposed a better argument for defending the ratification of the new Constitution which caused them to prevail.…
- 1323 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
(Suggested time- 45 minutes. This question counts for one-third of the total essay section score.)…
- 1489 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
References: Bernstein, Richard B. (2008). Ratification of the Constitution. Retrieved March 13, 2008 from http://www.answers.com/topic/ratification-of-the-constitution…
- 690 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Asses the Constitution in terms of the compromises developed by the delegates in the context of two of the following: Presidency, Representation, Slavery.…
- 379 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Constitution was originally thought of as an instrument of national unity, but by the 1850s, that thought was debatable. The document was interpreted differently in the North than in the South, which naturally created tensions. The North and the South’s argument was whether or not slavery was constitutional. The Constitution did not say anything upfront about slavery, which caused problems and confusion. However, the Constitution was not a source of sectional discord, and it did not contribute to failure of the union it had created.…
- 577 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
What were the major arguments used by each side (the supporters and the opponents) in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution?…
- 1033 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Debate over the constitution was important for the entire United States. Anti Federalist were people who didn't want to ratify the constitution. They didn't want to give the central government more power scared it could turn into Britain. There scared they will cripple the state's power so they have little control. Federalist were people who wanted to ratify the constitution. The federalist wanted a stronger central government so that it has more control over the states. The articles gave the central government with very little power so they want to ratify it. The important Federalist were John Jay, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. They were Strong supporters of the Constitution . They wrote an 85 page essay in the New York newspaper to get New York citizens to ratify the constitution. That Debating the Constitution was important for our country in its first stages of a of developing a government equal for all and also what didn't work for the articles work for this government.…
- 729 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays