Explain Why Was There Such Opposition To The Proposed Constitution Of 1787
Natasha Romanishan Class six Assignment 8
1. Why was there such opposition to the proposed Constitution of 1787?
There was opposition to the constitution because many mainly the anti-federalists believed it would turn into tyranny and everything that happened in the American Revolution and there steps towards a democracy would end and it would become like Britain. Therefore the war would mean nothing and democracy would not happen, the government would take over.
2. Was there a violation of revolutionary ideology in the way the senate and house were organized? Was there a violation of revolutionary ideology in the office of president?
The revolutionary ideology was to break away from a strong national government. I believe the senate and house were because they wanted a strong government and an over head whereas the president I do not think violated because he was fair and …show more content…
I believe that 51 is the shortest. They are not all the same but all similar dealing with the same overall topic, it seems as each paper is a continuation that paper 39 is continuing with 10 but a different main point like there was three different points to the major concept.
4. Most historians regard George Washington as a successful president. Is his reputation deserved? Make a case for or against this assertion.
I think George Washington was a strong successful president. I feel he was impartial, smart and a leader. He was thoughtful and had military experience. His decision to remain neutral in the war was a great move because it made us not choose sides until we had to and that way we weren’t enemies with either country. I think Washington was strategic with this move, he was a fair president. Overall, looked at both sides, tried to do what was right and honest. I think he was was a man of integrity and that is an important thing in a president.
5. What was Alexander Hamilton's three part economic program and why was it
1. Why was there such opposition to the proposed Constitution of 1787?
There was opposition to the constitution because many mainly the anti-federalists believed it would turn into tyranny and everything that happened in the American Revolution and there steps towards a democracy would end and it would become like Britain. Therefore the war would mean nothing and democracy would not happen, the government would take over.
2. Was there a violation of revolutionary ideology in the way the senate and house were organized? Was there a violation of revolutionary ideology in the office of president?
The revolutionary ideology was to break away from a strong national government. I believe the senate and house were because they wanted a strong government and an over head whereas the president I do not think violated because he was fair and …show more content…
I believe that 51 is the shortest. They are not all the same but all similar dealing with the same overall topic, it seems as each paper is a continuation that paper 39 is continuing with 10 but a different main point like there was three different points to the major concept.
4. Most historians regard George Washington as a successful president. Is his reputation deserved? Make a case for or against this assertion.
I think George Washington was a strong successful president. I feel he was impartial, smart and a leader. He was thoughtful and had military experience. His decision to remain neutral in the war was a great move because it made us not choose sides until we had to and that way we weren’t enemies with either country. I think Washington was strategic with this move, he was a fair president. Overall, looked at both sides, tried to do what was right and honest. I think he was was a man of integrity and that is an important thing in a president.
5. What was Alexander Hamilton's three part economic program and why was it