Preview

antifederalists paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
556 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
antifederalists paper
Anti-Federalists Against too much Power
After the revolutionary war against britain the newly independent country made a new government. within the government to parties arose known as the Federalist and antifederalist. The Federalist were all for a strong government while the Anti-Federalist favored a weaker government.So when the Federaist tried to make a constitution that gave the government more power the Anti-Federalist refused to ratify the constitution.
One of the reasons the Anti-Federalist refused to ratify the constitution was because it gave too much power to the government. The constitution would allow the government to tax the people much like British government had done so before in England. Another aspect that they did not like was that the Anti-Federalist felt like the government term positions were too long. They feared that those in power would not want to lose such a power and would end up taking over the position they were in. The Anti-Federalist also felt like they gave too much power to the executive branch by giving him the power to veto laws and to have control of the army. They felt like the executive branch could use the position of Commander in chief to oppress the people. The Anti- Federalist felt as if the constitution was being modeled as though the British were once again in control of them like from before. Another reason the Anti-Federalist did not approve of the constitution was because they felt that it was written by the rich for the rich. They felt as if the constitution was more focused on protecting private property of the elite rather than protecting those people who needed help with their debts that could not be paid by the common people. The Anti-Federalist of course had had no say on what was written on the constitution since they were not including in the creation of the constitution. It was actually written in secret by rich elites and high status gentlemen like Franklin, Washington, Hamilton, Madison, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Anti federalist was more convincing because, Anti-Federalists fight that the Constitution gave lot more ability to the federal government, although speaking too much control away from state and local governments. Many perceive that the federal government would be too long removed to represent the ordinary citizen. Anti-Federalists scared that the nation was too large for the national government to answer to the anxieties of people on a state and local basis. The Anti-Federalists were also feared that the real text of the Constitution did not consist of a bill of rights.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Founders’ perceptions were that America was weak and de-centralized. They created a weak, confederal government designed to protect people’s liberties by being to small to be a threat, but it was too small to handle national problems. The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are that one, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights, the power of the president is addressed and the separation of the branches. This changed occurred to make the government stronger and address the nation’s problems. The Anti-Federalists were a large group who didn’t like the Constitution but didn’t know what they wanted yet and they contributed to the branches. The Federalist were defenders of the constitution and they contributed to the bill of…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While the Federalist were in favor of ratifying the Constitution because they wanted a strong central…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A collection of essays called, The Federalist, were published in 1787 and 1788 and basically supported the ratification of the constitution and the idea of a national authority without the fear of tyranny in the new government. The anti-federalists responded to this with what they considered to be the dangers of a more powerful central government.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists have their reasons & the Federalists have theirs. I’m against the idea of a central government and how the freedom of the states should be.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Who were the anti-federalists? Describe their views during the ratification debates and identify an important part of the Constitution that resulted from their involvement. Anti-federalists were a group of diverse individuals that opposed the new federal constitution. They were united by their fear of the new constitution that placing more power in the hands of national government was dangerous.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Powers of the national government were not well defined in the constitution. The Anti-Federalists opposed this, and they also took issue with the elastic and supremacy clause which they felt could give the national government the power to increase its own power. The Anti-Federalists wanted more defined powers of the national government in the Constitution.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists were for ratification, supporting the Constitution and everything in it. A few Federalists by the names of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote a collection of eighty-five articles and essays about the Constitution under the pseudonym Publius. Anti-Federalists did not support the Constitution for many reasons, one being the fact that it did not have a Bill of Rights. Another complaint was that the Constitution gave too much power to the central government, putting the states in danger.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Feds

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anti-federalists opposed ratification of the constitution. They wanted a weak federal government that wouldn’t threaten states’ rights. Anti-feds also wanted a Bill of Rights to declare and protect the rights of people. “As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety.” They didn’t want any of their natural rights to be taken away. “It…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists were happy that there was a federal government and that they were unified, and the anti-federalists were happy that they had their own individual rights and a checks and balance system to keep corruption from occurring in the government. Everyone has their own opinion, America is very diverse today and it was diverse in beliefs back then, so it was extremely hard for all of the colonists to stick together, without hurting one another, and form a unified country with a constitution that kept it all together, they were very patient, they had to be it was their ‘perfect’ government. Everyone wanted the perfect constitution because they wanted to prevent anything from happening that happened with their old king. The constitution had to be settled on, so both sides got some of their ideas put in, but both also had to give up some things to finally come together on a government, because the last one (Articles of Confederation) wasn’t working and the country wasn’t…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays