Although Silent Spring and The Jungle would both create similar reforms, their authors would have much different motivations for writing them. Rachel Carson, before publishing Silent Spring, would major in marine zoology at Pennsylvania Women 's College, where she would develop her interest in the naturalism and conservation going on at the time (Lear, 23). After graduating, she would take a job at the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries, where she would write about different issues concerning the environment at the time. After writing several books to some success, she would begin work on Silent Spring, as it she would find her naturalist causes to be her impetus. She even later on in her life write to her friends, What I discovered was that everything which meant most to me as a naturalist was being threatened, and that nothing I could do would be more important."(Carson, 17) On the contrary, however, Sinclair would not find his motivations from personal experience or interest, but rather from a commission to…
Chapter 2: The trend of humans harming their environment has grown upward for a time now. Carson claims in Chapter 2 that individuals have debased nature with hazardous and lethal chemicals. She goes into detail in this chapter that the amount of pesticides and chemicals being created and put into the atmosphere is dangerous and happening at a very rapid rate. At a point in the chapter, Carson calls pesticides “biocides” which goes to show that they do much more than just kill the intended insects they are meant for. Rather than that, pesticides kill all creatures including ourselves.…
What is the central conflict of the story? What is the source of the struggle?…
Silent Spring was a book written by Rachel Carson. It was about how chemicals pollute the world and how they harm people’s health. This book made people think and had a large impact on passing the environmental movement. In the 70s they were trying to promote healthy environments.…
The combinaries of her serious tone, with the addition of ethos does, indeed, get her point across immediately. In additional, Carson continues to weave her serious tone in the second paragrah. This is seen when she includes that the "casualty list included some 65,000 red-winged blackbirds and starlings." Carson does add to the determined tone but she also introduces a mixture of logos and pathos. The statistic, "65, 000 blackbirds and starlings", is an example of logos that proves to the reader that the parathion is immensely hindering and impacting the wildlife in Southern India. The rhetorical strategy, pathos, is seen when Carson proclaims that the additional wildlife affecyed, rabbits, raccoons, and opossums "perhaps never visited the farmers' cornfields were doomed by a judge and jury who neither knew of their existence nor cared." This makes the reader feel pity and a sense of melancholy because other living, breathing creatures were , etc with such a devastating fate, death. Lastly, Carson ends the second paragraph with a hyperbole when she states that farmers "waged their needless war on…
1 )Audience: From reading this sort excerpt from "Quiet", what inferences can you make about the intended audience of the book?…
This entry focuses mainly on the chemical DDT, which is over consumed on various vegetation, however, the overall idea is regarding our environment and how human actions are abolishing it, although it may be unintentional. To be more specific, the central idea consists of the environmental actions that are backfiring on our population in a negative way. Furthermore, in my opinion, Rachel Carson desires to spread awareness about the harmful deeds that are destroying our environment and our society’s health.…
Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring is an environmental novel that aimed to encourage action against the use of pesticides. Pesticides are insect repellents, which are chemicals meant to only kill insects that hurt plants but damage the environment. Carson’s book has been praised for raising public awareness on pesticides. In fact, it has since then made the government ban several of them, like DDT. While others say that pesticides should be kept to protect crops from harmful insects, many say that the pesticides are too damaging to the environment to use and they should be banned.…
The simple yet concrete diction that Carson uses increases her confidence in the pesticide's universality and capability to harm much of wildlife, to evoke sympathy for wildlife caught in the pesticide's net. Carson asserts that animals, especially birds, are now "finding themselves a direct target" of pesticides. The assertion that they are not "direct[ly]" targeted emphasizes the statement that farmers are now purposely trying to kill and "eradicate" these animals. She portrays wildlife as the goal that many farmers try to get rid of, in order to generate a feeling of sympathy toward those numerous animals now strongly aimed at, illustrating the widespread effects of pesticide use. Carson presents the conditions of several animals, such as the "rabbits or raccoons or opossums," which used to occupy a home in the lands near the river, are now "doomed." By mentioning these specific animals, which are usually thought of as cute and harmless, Carson highlights the innocence of wildlife in the area. The sudden transition from describing the innocence of the animals to the ominous future reveals…
The book, Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson is regarded as the most significant environmental novel as it was the start of the environmental movement. This book highlights the human poisoning of the biosphere through chemicals aimed at pests and disease control, particularly dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT). DDT pesticides were particularly harmful because as they entered the biosphere, they not only killed the bugs but also entered the food chain. DDT accumulated in the fatty tissues of animals and humans which had potential to cause cancer and genetic damage. This also contaminated world food supply as DDT can enter any animal that we eat. Despite the immense effect of DDT some insects survived and passed on their resistance resulting in tougher descendants, so more toxic insecticides needed to be…
She embedded the view that “all human beings were but one part of nature distinguished primarily by their power to alter it, in some cases irreversibly” in all her writings. Carson strived all her life for the world to become a better environment to live in. At 57 years old she died from breast cancer. In 1966, the Rachel Carson Natural Wildlife Refuge was established. It was established to protect salt marshes and estuaries for migratory birds.…
In "The Obligation to Endure," Rachel Carson explains how man is destroying earth because of the advancements in science, along with the continuous use of numerous chemicals. During her essay, she points out to the reader that humans continue to use chemicals to produce our products since they like having the ability to manage the growth of the plants. Carson argues that the use of chemicals is damaging "poisoning" nature along with destroying our environment…
1. Rachel Carson main point in “Negotiating the Environment” part I is that the place she is describing might not exist, but what does exist is the fact that every disaster she mentioned has happened somewhere. The story is an effective way to put this point across because the reader can get the idea of what could happen and how the world will look if we don’t take care of it. Her main argument in part II is that humanity is destroying nature with all the contamination and substances being used. She does appeal to logic and reason. She gives examples of what could happen and she establishes reasons of why we should believe her because she gives facts and not just her opinions.…
2. In “A Fable for Tomorrow” (pp. 123-124), Rachel Carson raises the serious issues of pollution and environmental protection. Select specific examples from Carson’s essay and essays by Sang Il Lee (“Our Earthly Fate”, pp.233-234), or David Suzuki (“Overpopulation Is Bad but Overconsumption Is Worse”, pp. 88-90), to present reasons why “The people had done it themselves” and discuss how in THREE ways human beings are suffering from consequences of their own irresponsible actions.…
In humans recent history there has been an increased noticeable mistreatment of the world around them. Humans need to know we are not the only ones living there, there are plants and animals and future offspring for all. Not only does the earth need to be treated well for them but it also needs to be treated well for us, because we rely on them for a healthy life. Many people may say that there is a connection between nature and humans theses thoughts are expressed in Annie Dillard's short story, “Living Like Weasels”. Both authors have their point of view on topics but both agree that human behavior needs to improve for a bigger better future.…