Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
Thatcherism well-liked the idea of privatising, so she privatised industries such as oil, coal and gas. The current Conservative party has not made any changes to this policies in fact they have kept to it. In 2013 the Royal Mail was privatised. This shows us that the party has not completely abandoned Thatcherism, however many would argue that the Conservative party is not privatising as much as Mrs Thatcher did in fact they are doing it on a much smaller scale. This connotes that they are drifting away from the idea of Thatcherism.
Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
Thatcherism well-liked the idea of privatising, so she privatised industries such as oil, coal and gas. The current Conservative party has not made any changes to this policies in fact they have kept to it. In 2013 the Royal Mail was privatised. This shows us that the party has not completely abandoned Thatcherism, however many would argue that the Conservative party is not privatising as much as Mrs Thatcher did in fact they are doing it on a much smaller scale. This connotes that they are drifting away from the idea of Thatcherism.
Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
Thatcherism well-liked the idea of privatising, so she privatised industries such as oil, coal and gas. The current Conservative party has not made any changes to this policies in fact they have kept to it. In 2013 the Royal Mail was privatised. This shows us that the party has not completely abandoned Thatcherism, however many would argue that the Conservative party is not privatising as much as Mrs Thatcher did in fact they are doing it on a much smaller scale. This connotes that they are drifting away from the idea of Thatcherism.
Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
Thatcherism well-liked the idea of privatising, so she privatised industries such as oil, coal and gas. The current Conservative party has not made any changes to this policies in fact they have kept to it. In 2013 the Royal Mail was privatised. This shows us that the party has not completely abandoned Thatcherism, however many would argue that the Conservative party is not privatising as much as Mrs Thatcher did in fact they are doing it on a much smaller scale. This connotes that they are drifting away from the idea of Thatcherism.
Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
Thatcherism well-liked the idea of privatising, so she privatised industries such as oil, coal and gas. The current Conservative party has not made any changes to this policies in fact they have kept to it. In 2013 the Royal Mail was privatised. This shows us that the party has not completely abandoned Thatcherism, however many would argue that the Conservative party is not privatising as much as Mrs Thatcher did in fact they are doing it on a much smaller scale. This connotes that they are drifting away from the idea of Thatcherism.
Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
Thatcherism well-liked the idea of privatising, so she privatised industries such as oil, coal and gas. The current Conservative party has not made any changes to this policies in fact they have kept to it. In 2013 the Royal Mail was privatised. This shows us that the party has not completely abandoned Thatcherism, however many would argue that the Conservative party is not privatising as much as Mrs Thatcher did in fact they are doing it on a much smaller scale. This connotes that they are drifting away from the idea of Thatcherism.
Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
Thatcherism well-liked the idea of privatising, so she privatised industries such as oil, coal and gas. The current Conservative party has not made any changes to this policies in fact they have kept to it. In 2013 the Royal Mail was privatised. This shows us that the party has not completely abandoned Thatcherism, however many would argue that the Conservative party is not privatising as much as Mrs Thatcher did in fact they are doing it on a much smaller scale. This connotes that they are drifting away from the idea of Thatcherism.
Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
Thatcherism well-liked the idea of privatising, so she privatised industries such as oil, coal and gas. The current Conservative party has not made any changes to this policies in fact they have kept to it. In 2013 the Royal Mail was privatised. This shows us that the party has not completely abandoned Thatcherism, however many would argue that the Conservative party is not privatising as much as Mrs Thatcher did in fact they are doing it on a much smaller scale. This connotes that they are drifting away from the idea of Thatcherism.
Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
Thatcherism well-liked the idea of privatising, so she privatised industries such as oil, coal and gas. The current Conservative party has not made any changes to this policies in fact they have kept to it. In 2013 the Royal Mail was privatised. This shows us that the party has not completely abandoned Thatcherism, however many would argue that the Conservative party is not privatising as much as Mrs Thatcher did in fact they are doing it on a much smaller scale. This connotes that they are drifting away from the idea of Thatcherism.
Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
Thatcherism well-liked the idea of privatising, so she privatised industries such as oil, coal and gas. The current Conservative party has not made any changes to this policies in fact they have kept to it. In 2013 the Royal Mail was privatised. This shows us that the party has not completely abandoned Thatcherism, however many would argue that the Conservative party is not privatising as much as Mrs Thatcher did in fact they are doing it on a much smaller scale. This connotes that they are drifting away from the idea of Thatcherism.
Another key idea was to reduce the role of the welfare state in peoples lives and promote the idea of individualism rather than relying on government aid. This lead to more money being saved and allowing tax cuts.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Another reason why Conservatives won is that in there manifesto they promised to stabilise the cost of living which would close the gap between rich and poor and double everyone’s standard of living. This was helped by Labour being identified with the working class rather than the nation as a whole. This was a problem as 40% of manual workers now considered themselves middle class so the Labour policies for the unemployed and working class no longer appealed to them, instead they…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
During her electoral campaign, Margaret Thatcher promised to introduce a series of parliamentary bills in order to rescue Britain from an uncertain economic and social future. Working closely with her key Shadow Cabinet colleagues (like Nigel Lawson and Willie Whitelaw) prior to the election, Margaret Thatcher promised the electorate that her administration would help encourage personal prosperity whilst also pledging to curb the power held by the unions and thereby help to get the economy back on track.…
- 996 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Many believed that Thatcher offered an alternative to the Labour government, a change, so after Callaghan’s government was destroyed by economic crises, rising unemployment, hostile trade unions and political misjudgements the Conservatives had a landslide victory with 43.9% of the vote. Before the Conservative rise to power with Thatcher, the Labour party had experience many troubles during their time in government, perhaps this is why the Conservatives won the General election. However was this win purely down to the conservatives and their policies or was it down to the failure of the Labour party.…
- 650 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One reason for this could be because the 1980s introduced a new form of voters – known as “working class Tories”. The Conservative party gave the middle class the opportunity to purchase houses previously owned by the council. This allowed for them to own property – something that was only previously achievable by the upper classes. By doing this, Thatcher increased the working class support for the Conservative party which shows class dealignment. The 1974 general election showed C2 and DE classes voting for the conservative party at 26% and 22% of the electorate. However in 1979, when Thatcher gave these classes the opportunity to purchases houses, they increased to 41% and…
- 862 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Tory government from 1819 to 1829 introduced a lot of social and economic reforms, which had both positive and negative effects and varied in success. The cabinet shuffle in 1822 gave the Tories a ‘liberal’ reputation as many of the successful reforms came after this; however it can be questioned whether or not they were as liberal as they seemed as a lot of their reforms had already been in production beforehand and were not actually thought of by the ‘liberal’ Tory government.…
- 1351 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Nixon presented the plan in conservative terms—as a program that would reduce the supervisory role of the federal government and make welfare recipients responsible for their own lives.…
- 3158 Words
- 13 Pages
Good Essays -
Due to this Lloyd George had to concede to the conservatives at times as he did when they demanded that cuts be made and that Lloyd George agree to the Geddes axe. This was a mistake as it led to him earning a reputation of not fulfilling promises of reconstruction and led to a decline in popularity. The conservatives only needed Lloyd George as long as he was popular with the people and therefore an asset to them, his gradual decline in popularity led to the conservatives questioning his worth. His policies also went against what they stood for the most part and even though they remained loyal to the coalition due to Bonar Law, cracks appeared when Austen Chamberlain replaced him as leader of conservatives. However, it can argued that the conservatives were being pragmatic in letting Lloyd George introduce some social reform, especially since working class had received the vote. This did not deter backbenchers and die hards who grew in number and in criticism of Lloyd George’s policies, which culminated in the formation of the anti-waste league who won two by-elections, evidence that they held influence. As Lloyd George’s unpopularity grew so did the conservative attitude change towards him except in the senior members, which also led to the fear that a split may emerge over loyalty to the coalition.…
- 1128 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
My next reason for the Liberals introducing the reforms is the rise of Socialism. The Liberals wanted nothing more than to stamp out Socialism, as it was a growing theme in the late 19th century. Countries such as Russia had already adopted the system and the Liberals were determined not to go down the same route. In a 1908 speech, Winston Churchill said, ‘Socialism seeks to pull down wealth; Liberalism seeks to rise up poverty’. This quote shows how the Liberals negatively talked about Socialism and positively talked about Liberalism to manipulative the public into voting the Liberals. They wanted the people to fight against socialism and not for it. They eventually realised that reforms would keep the British people happy therefore meaning less support for any revolutionary movements. I know that people turn to socialism when they are unhappy…
- 965 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hay, C. (1994). ‘Labour’s Thatcherite Revisionism: Playing the “Politics of Catch-Up”’, in Political Studies 42 (4).…
- 3395 Words
- 14 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Another one of Labour’s reforms to the UK was the devolution act. In Labour’s manifesto they said that they would address the issues of devolution and making the country more democratic. When Labour got into office they did…
- 626 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A short story of Margaret Thatcher’s life is she was a controversial figurehead of conservative ideology during her time as the first female prime minister of Britain. She was born in Grantham, England on October 13, 1925 and became Britain’s Conservative Party leader. She was selected the prime minister of Britain in 1979 and became the first woman to hold that position. She cut social welfare programs, reduced trade union power, and denationalized certain industries during her three terms as Britain’s prime minister. Due to unpopular policy and power conflicts in her party, Thatcher resigned as Britain’s prime minister in 1991. Thatcher later died at the age of 87 on April 8th, 2013 (Biography.com…
- 2043 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
While the Labour party has always adapted their agenda to the working class the Conservatives try to come across as party that does not focus on a specific class, religion or ethnicity but on terms that relate to everybody like ‘the nation’ or ‘the people’. A conservative party can do this, because their name does not, like Labour or Liberalism, imply a certain ideology. The core of Conservatism is to focus on tradition and protects the existing structure of order (Huntington,1957, p. 455). Certain changes in the 60s contributed to this, the working class was shrinking and the manual workers felt less connected by just class with the Labour. You could therefore say there was a shift from class voting to valence voting, which meant that people were less likely to vote according to their class, but more likely to vote what they believed would give the most prosperity (Turner, 2003, p. 190). This does not mean that people will automatically vote Conservative, but it does help the Conservatives because workers are less likely to vote automatically vote…
- 2456 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Since the 1930’s the face of welfare has been shaped multiple times with many different types of reforms. These reform were made in an attempt to reduce the number of people who depend on government assistance, and to help those people get back on their feet and function in a normal society. Some reforms that were major in the beginning steps of welfare were The Welfare Reform Act of 1996, the (PRWORA) Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, and The (TANF) Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. “In 1996 a welfare reform act was passed” (U.S Welfare System 2). “The welfare Reform act was a catalyst needed to begin this new era of welfare benefits and provision” (U.S Welfare System 4). As a result of this reform employment rates of recipients soared and caseloads dropped dramatically, But looking at the bigger picture this paved way for such a dramatic change in the society and how the government helped the people of the United States. Following this…
- 1103 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Welfare Reform Act of 1996 had three main purposes and several different opinions on whether they were going to work or not. The main purposes of the Welfare Reform Act were to reduce welfare dependence and increase employment, to reduce child poverty, and to reduce illegitimacy and strengthen marriage (Rector, R., & Fagan, P. F., February 6, 2003). Due to the abundance of opinions and opposing facts it is hard to tell whether or not which positive and negative facts are true when it comes to how effective these purposes were after the Welfare Reform Act was implemented.…
- 831 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The welfare reform proposal was an emotional battle as it suggested cutting funding to welfare programs. There was an ideological split between the Democrats and the Republicans. The Democrats argued that that government assistance programs can alleviate poverty. The Republicans believed that the current welfare system created dependency, illegitimacy, and more poverty. The main aspects of change in the welfare reform bill were: turning over welfare funds to the states, imposing a five year time limit on benefits, and requiring recipients to go to work within two year or sooner.…
- 270 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays