assessments. This will allow you to check and monitor progress of delivery but also allow a check of knowledge. For P4 I’m going to write all about lay people in court. These include the jury and magistrates. I will explain their role/ purpose and all the qualifications needed for these roles. Jury; The jury is a body of people whose purpose is to render an impartial verdict on a
Premium Jury
Concise Summary of Case - Anthony Tan was one of the most wanted men as he was allegedly charged for murder of Bosnian refugee and Rebels bikie‚ Edin “Boz” Smajovic. After 2 years building an export business in Vietnam‚ he read a media report from NSW‚ describing him as one of the state’s most wanted men. He was unaware for 2 years of the police hunt for him. He immediately got on the phone‚ first his lawyer‚ then to an airline. He was more than willing to return to Australia to fight his allegations
Premium Jury Criminal law Judge
Critical Analysis of the Film: “Twelve Angry Men” Twelve Angry Men (1957) is a classic film where twelve strangers are brought together into a hot and humid New York jury room‚ to negotiate and decide on the fate of a poor‚ young Latino boy who is accused of killing his father (Lumet). These twelve jurors come from diverse backgrounds‚ and throughout the film exhibit behaviors that demonstrate their cultural‚ economic and social differences. In the beginning of the film‚ these dissimilar viewpoints
Premium Jury Henry Fonda 12 Angry Men
I have recently read Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose and decided to write a letter based on your behavior in the jury. I’ll start my letter with your personal life‚ you started your business from scratch and now you have thirty-four employees working for you. How do you treat your worker: do you treat them with respect? By the way you were behaving in the jury‚ it seems like you disrespect your employees. You might be wondering why I called you a disrespectful person? On page 26‚ when all of the
Premium Jury English-language films Court
a group’s decision-making. In this classic movie‚ twelve members of a jury are isolated in a conference room to debate the outcome of a murder trial involving a young man stabbing his father. From the first preliminary vote‚ it becomes clear that eleven of the twelve jury members believe the leading suspect to be guilty‚ relying heavily on stereotypical views of the slums to support their verdicts. Henry Fondra is the only jury member who is not completely certain about the suspect being guilty‚ or
Premium Jury Verdict
but instead the jury‚ Darrow convinces the jury that to spare the boys their lives would be to preserve the well-being of the entire community‚ effectively appealing to the jury’s personal self-interests. Darrow logically reinterprets any harms to the future generations to exist solely as a direct causation resulting from the execution of Leopold and Loeb‚ leaving the jury no choice save for mercy. Darrow begins by establishing a common ground between both the defense and the jury through citing The
Premium Black people Jury Murder
prosecutions. Not only does this amendment provide the right to a speedy trial‚ the right to confront witnesses against him‚ the right to counsel‚ this amendment provides the right to be tried by an impartial jury of his peers. While the trial takes place‚ it is the responsibility of the jury to listen and retain facts and evidence presented by the prosecution and the defense. It is their duty to determine guilt or innocence based solely on the facts and evidence presented during trial. If a guilty
Premium Jury Verdict
Many Continental European systems use the "civil law" method. Under that system‚ all the lawyers in the case are responsible to help in the "search for the truth." If one lawyer has information that would help the other side or comes to agree with the other side’s view‚ he or she has the right and/or duty to say so. Which system do you think is more effective and why? Also‚ do you see any constitutional problems with applying the civil law system to the U.S.? For this assignment‚ in addition
Premium Common law Jury Adversarial system
Describe the role of courts in the criminal justice process: The main role of the courts is to interpret and apply the law. In terms of a criminal justice process the court serves as the place in which a trial is heard and a sentence decided. Evaluate the use of the adversary system as a means of achieving justice: The adversarial system is moderately effective in achieving just outcomes for the individual and society as well as attempting to protect their rights. One of the main features
Premium Law Jury Common law
stated: “Trial by jury is more than instrument of justice and more than a wheel”. Jury plays a vital role in the criminal justice system‚ but the constitution position in England is vulnerable because of the unwritten constitution‚ the right to trial by jury is not written in the constitution. Juries Act 1974 is the main statute governing the present day jury. Currently‚ the role of the English jury is almost entirely limited to the more serious criminal cases‚ but juries occasionally sit in
Premium Law Common law Judge