problem-solving courts is how much more involved a judge is with each case. In traditional courts‚ a judge will most likely read off the names of the people in the docket‚ and simply sentence an individual according to what the DA has already negotiated. During a problem-solving court‚ the judge has the opportunity to get to know each defendant on a more personal level‚ and be able to help the defendant succeed. While results have shown that the more involved judges are‚ the more likely it is for a program
Premium Law Judge Jury
keep on building on past initiatives to address intractable problems as well as emerging ones. I shall discuss case decongestion‚ integrity and independence of judges‚ transparency and accountability in the Judiciary‚ infrastructure needs of the Judiciary‚ compensation of judges‚ court administration‚ and training and career path for judges. These are my personal thoughts‚ as I do not claim to speak for the entire Court. I. CASE DECONGESTION 1. The number one problem of the Judiciary is clogged dockets
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Judge Court
In a ‘democratic republic’ power with accountability of the individual enjoying it‚ is essential to avert disaster for any democratic system. The accountability must be comprehensive to include not only the politicians‚ but also the bureaucrats‚ judges and everyone invested with public power. Power and position in the society come attendant with responsibility‚ and every incumbent of a public office must remain constantly accountable to the people‚ who are the repository of political sovereignty
Premium Judge Supreme Court of the United States
JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION BILL‚ 2014 A BILL to regulate the procedure to be followed by the National Judicial Appointments Commission for recommending persons for appointment as the Chief Justice of India and other Judges of the Supreme Court and Chief Justices and other Judges of High Courts and for their transfers and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-fifth Year of the Republic of India as follows:— 1. (1) This Act may be called the
Free Judge Court
Justice delayed is justice denied Justice delayed is justice denied" is a legal maxim meaning that if legal redress is available for a party that has suffered some injury‚ but is not forthcoming in a timely fashion‚ it is effectively the same as having no redress at all. This principle is the basis for the right to a speedy trial and similar rights which are meant to expedite the legal system‚ because it is unfair for the injured party to have to sustain the injury with little hope for resolution
Premium Judge Bench Court
High Courts Federal Shariat Court Subordinate Courts Special Courts and Tribunals 6.1 Service Tribunals 5 6 7 8 9 Procedural Law Terms and Conditions of Service of subordinate Judiciary Organisation and Strength of Judicial Hierarchy 9.1 9.2 9.3 Judges Administrative Staff Administrative Tribunals 10 11 Court Jurisdiction Strength of Law Officers and Lawyers 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 Law Officers of Federation and Provinces Advocates‚ Supreme Court Advocates‚ High Courts Advocates‚ Subordinate
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Court Judge
or not. Each court has to decide for itself whether there is a precedent binding in the cases given and covering the cases given. Where there is a case to be decided is one that is without a precedent‚ the judge must decide it according to general principles of the law. By doing so‚ the judge lays down as original precedent which would then be used in subsequent similar cases. There are two main principles that are involved in judicial precedent; these are ratio decidendi and the obiter dictum
Premium Common law Precedent Stare decisis
representation will be used Role of the Adjudicator * Either a judge or magistrates sitting alone or a judge and a jury * The judge is responsible for ensuring that both parties obey the rules of the court‚ application of the rules of evidence and procedure‚ ensuring that the burden of proof is satisfied. * In criminal cases where there is no jury the judge decides guilt or innocence. In criminal cases where there is a jury the judge will sum up the facts and relevant law and determine the sanction
Premium Jury Law Judge
before an impartial person or group of people‚ usually a jury or judge‚ who attempt to determine the truth of the case (Adversary procedure). Meaning There would be two lawyers one defense lawyer and a Prosecutor lawyer. In this system‚ the parties to a controversy develop and present their arguments‚ gather and submit evidence‚ call and question witnesses‚ and‚ within the confines of certain rules‚ control the
Premium Law Jury Lawyer
P5: Outline the rules for Statutory Interpretation Judges are highly qualified professionals that enforce the law in court while dealing with cases but sometimes‚ judges need help understanding the law that has been put in place by Parliament. Statutory interpretation helps judges in court understand a piece of delegated legislation when the words are unclear. There are a few reasons why the meaning of an Act may be uncertain: • If during the making of the Act‚ Parliament failed to notice any error
Premium Law United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States