of compassion‚ and that many people and cultures may view compassion as a basic human value. If I see someone in pain or someone struggling‚ my first instinct is to help‚ to listen‚ to be there. I will be there if someone needs help‚ if someone needs an ear‚ if someone just needs someone to acknowledge that they’re here and that their gripe is valid. I would rather live like that. It doesn’t always make life easier though. The Bible tells us of the compassionate acts that Jesus performed
Premium Feeling Suffering Emotion
Kants Universal Law Kant’s universal law states‚ “Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law”. (Kant pg.37) So in the first instance this appears to me a rule I pretty much live by‚ and which have often been taught to myself and others as young children in a simpler form of “Treat others how you would like to be treated.” Kant describes his universal law in several examples and one caught my attention
Premium Ethics Lie Parent
which discusses the ethics of care‚ and the ethics of justice. Although these theories are separated by centuries‚ they complement each other. Both theories discuss how to make ethical decisions. Kant’s theory simply says to act as though what you are doing will become a universal law for everyone and to treat people as ends‚ not as a means. Alternatively‚ Spelman’s theories take more into consideration. Deontological Ethics is the theory‚ or
Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics
Over time philosophers have written countless books‚ theories‚ and essays as a way of changing the way people think and view life. Immanuel Kant‚ a philosopher around the seventeen and early eighteenth century‚ was no different in his thoughts and writings about morality‚ freedom‚ reason‚ and standpoints. Morality being one of the most contradictory concepts out there‚ it only suits that there are numerous theories. Unlike Utilitarianism‚ which considers an actions morality to be dependent upon
Premium
philosophers of the time‚ Locke‚ Hume‚ and Kant‚ were big proponents of the scientific method and used it in each of their ideas behind morality. While all three follow this way of inquiry‚ Kant’s theories abide by the method better because he proposes
Premium Scientific method Science Epistemology
The 1920’s were a time of great cultural change in America. Traditionalists found the new values of the Jazz Age to be utterly sinful and immoral. The youth of the twenties rebelled against the constraints of their elders in several ways. One of the most provocative changes was the "new look" for young women. The Flapper Era entered America with a bang. Ladies did the unthinkable in cutting their long tresses to chin length bobs‚ smoking‚ wearing shorter dresses and even engaging
Premium Ku Klux Klan Prohibition in the United States Scopes Trial
All Human life is sacred: Is there any place for euthanasia and abortion within Christianity or Buddhism? All human life is sacred‚ and therefore the topics of euthanasia and abortion are both controversial issues that are commonly discussed around the world today. As such they are talked about very carefully and it is safe to assume that different people and different religions will hold different views on these very controversial issues. I hope to discuss the views of the different religions on
Premium Religion Human Morality
Purpose of a human life depends on the person who has it. Most of the people find it useful or meaningful if they had something or someone that fulfills their immaterial or material desires and contradictory for those people that doesn’t have that fulfills theirs. As I far as I know‚ human gives different meanings or purposes on their lives; in good way and bad. That is why answering this question is a bit tricky for us. Many people ask the same question in many different varieties‚ but searching
Free Meaning of life Personal life Teacher
Despite several overlapping similarities between Aristotle and Kant on virtue ethics‚ there are fundamental differences between their view on the source of virtuous action. In this paper‚ I will argue‚ the underpinning behind each respectable view differs; as Aristotle believes virtuous action derives from choices lying in the mean whereas‚ Kant does not hold that virtuous action lies in the mean‚ but rather‚ holds they proceed from duty acting in accordance with universal principles. The fundamental
Premium Virtue Ethics
Utilitarianism and Kant’s respective have different ways for demonstrating whether an act we do is right or wrong. Corresponding to Kant‚ we should look at our maxims‚ intentions‚ of a particular action. Kantians believe “If we are rational‚ we will each agree to curb our self-interest and cooperate with one another” (Shafer-Landau‚ Russ 194). In other words‚ humans are rational beings capable of rational behavior and should not be used purely for self-interest. On the other hand‚ Utilitarian’s believe
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant