Compensation Decisions. The Academy of Management. 21397-409. Gagne‚ M. (2009). A model of knowledge-sharing motivation‚ Human Resource Management‚ 48(4)‚ 571– 589. Gruneberg‚ M. M. (1979). Understanding job satisfaction. Basingstoke : MacMillan. Kreitner‚ R.‚ & A. Kinici. (2004). Organizational Behavior‚ 6th Edition. Boston‚ MA: McGraw-Hill‚ Irwin. La Motta‚ T. (1995). Recognition: The quality way. New York: Quality Resources. Lawler‚ E. E. (2003). Treat people right. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc
Premium Motivation Reward system Employment
References: Are you a team or solo player? (1996). Retrieved from http://www.queendom.com/tests/access_page/index.htm?idRegTest= 1119 Kreitner‚ R.‚ & Kinicki‚ A. (2008). Organizational behavior (8th Ed.). New York‚ NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies‚ Inc. Mcshane‚ L. Steven‚ (2000). Communication and Negotiation. New York‚ NY: The Mcgraw- Hill Companies‚ Inc. Rahim‚ M. A. (1983‚ June). A measure of
Free Personality psychology Big Five personality traits Decision making
|Subject: ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR (MBA ) 2013-2014 |Trimester: I | |Hours / Week: 4 Hours / Week (45 hours in total) | |Faculty: Dr Harold Andrew Patrick
Premium Conflict Organizational studies Case study
Recorded sessions: COS Section I A (Ch 5&6 Operations Management Textbook): http://wgu.adobeconnect.com/p5greg443u6/ COS Section I B (Ch 11 Organizational Behavior Textbook‚ ch 7&8 Operation Management)http://wgu.adobeconnect.com/p1gugp71enw/ COS Section IC (Ch 15&17 Operation Management): http://wgu.adobeconnect.com/p8bwu9q12q7/ COS Section II (Ch 9 Operations Management Textbook): http://wgu.adobeconnect.com/p6kte60617v/ COS Section II continued (Ch 10 Operations Management Textbook):
Premium Management Decision theory Supply chain management
is four types of competing values framework‚ (1) clan‚ (2) adhocracy‚ (3) market‚ and (4) hierarchy (Kinicki & Williams‚ 2013‚ p. 229). These competing values framework is periodically used classifications or tools to explain types of organizational culture (Kinicki‚ 2013‚ slide 18). This was designed by people who were examining measures of companies use of organizational effectiveness (Kinicki‚ 2013‚ slide 18). Based off of reading the competing values framework‚ I believe Verizon’s current culture
Premium Management Marketing Strategic management
ProQuest database. Kotter‚ J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kotter‚ J. P. (1995). Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kinicki‚ A.‚ & Kreitner‚ R. (2003). Organizational behavior (6th ed.). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies. Maurer‚ R. & Associates. (2002). Change Without Migraines. Retrieved November 24‚ 2006 from http://www.beyondresistance.com/. McShane‚ S. L.‚ & Von Glinow
Premium Management Change management Leadership
whereas effort towards Organizational goals reflects work-related behavior. Many contemporary authors have also defined the concept of motivation. Motivation has been defined as: the psychological process that gives behavior purpose and direction (Kreitner‚ 1995); Motivation is operationally defined as the inner force that drives individuals to accomplish personal and organizational goals. We mainly deal with the motivating employees in an organization towards the organizational goal for the benefit
Premium Maslow's hierarchy of needs Motivation
are faced with many issues. A major challenge is dealing with and determining a code of ethics. Ethics involves the study of moral issues and choices (Kinicki‚ 2009). Many organizations today are faced with unethical behavior that occurs throughout the company. Ethical and unethical conduct is the product of a complex combination of influences (Kinicki‚ 2009). They stem from the individual who has their own personality and values out to the internal organizational influences such as: organizational
Premium Business ethics Morality Ethics
precisely what GM was trying to do by confronting the upper level markets such as BMW and Hyundai corporations. It was presenting a confidence in something unidentified‚ which could rebound and cause them to suffer in the later on down the road (Kinicki & Williams‚ 2013‚ p. 135&150). General Motors correspondingly displayed traits of being reactionary in their planning. They apparently were in a substantial amount of debt and could not advance without the government bailout. They postponed until
Premium Management General Motors Mobile phone
the conclusion of how many data elements were access during the breach. With the prevailing news stories‚ correct or not‚ Target’s reputation and sales suffered‚ Chief Marketing Officer Jeffrey Jones summed it up the best‚ “That’s hammering us” (Kinicki & Williams‚ 2013‚ pg. 37‚
Premium Chief executive officer Security Executive officer