Multi Disciplinary Edu Global Quest (Quarterly)‚ Volume 2‚ Issue 3 #7‚ July 2013 A JOURNEY TOWARDS IMPLEMENTING DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY AN ANALYSIS OF LANDMARK CASES Bhupal Bhattacharya B.com (H)‚ LL.M.‚ PGDCA Lecturer in Law‚ Law College Durgapur‚ Mob. 09564368001; bhupalbhattacharya@gmail.com Bineet Kedia B.Com‚ LL.M.‚ UGC-NET Lecturer in Law ‚ Amity University‚ Jaipur‚ Rajasthan‚ Mob. 09587132477; bineetkedia@gmail.com ABSTRACT: Directive Principles are essential in the governance
Free India Constitution of India United States Constitution
Cases Maula Bux v Union of India 11 The Special Officer Amaravati v DV Thirumalswamy 12 Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd v BWL Ltd 12 Dilip Kumar Bhargava v Urmila Devi Sharma and Ors 12 Sri Hanuman Cotton Mills and Ors v Tata Aircraft Ltd 12 Fateh Chand v Balkishan Dass 13 Alok Kumar Aich v Asoke Kumar Aich 14 Lingo Bhimrao Naik v DattatrayaShripad Jamadagni 14 Limpus v London General Omnibus Company 15 Joel v Morrison 15 Plumb v Cobden Flour Mills and Co. Ltd. 15 Deatons v Flew 16 Pitts v
Premium Tort Contract law Breach of contract
ethno. botanical herb‚ Plant Cell Rep. 18: 873-878 Rajakaruna N‚ Harris CS‚ Towers GHN (2000) Raja Reddy K‚ Sudarsanam G‚ Gopal Rao P (1989) Plant drugs of Chittoor District‚ Andhra Pradesh‚ India Res 27:41–54 Retnam KR‚ De Britto AJ (2003) Sahoo‚ Y.; Chand‚ P. K. (1998) Micropropagation of Vitex negundo L.‚ a woody aromatic medicinal shrub‚ through high frequency axillary shoot proliferation Sanyal M‚ Dutta Gupta S‚ Jana MK‚ Kundu SC (1998) Shoot organogenesis and plantlet regeneration from leaf callus
Premium Cell culture
Introduction to Chandigarh Chandigarh is the first planned modern city ofIndia designed by the French architect Le Corbusier. Chandigarh is a city in India that serves as the capital of two states - Punjab and Haryana. However‚ the city does not belong to either state. Rather‚ the city is administered by the federal government and hence classified as a union territory. Chandigarh and the area surrounding it were constituted as a union territory on 1st November‚ 1966. The city was named after the
Premium Chandigarh Le Corbusier Himachal Pradesh
Revised Syllabus with Credit based Semester and Grading System For The Master of Management Studies (MMS) 2Years full-time Degree Course (Effective from the academic year 2012 – 2013) MMS New Course Structure (Effective July 2012 onwards) MMS First Year: Semester I Subject/Paper Maximum Number of Marks Sessions of 90 Minutes Core Papers 1.1 Perspective Management 1.2 Financial Accounting 1.3 Managerial Economics 1.4 Operations Management 1.5 Organisational Behaviour 1.6
Premium Management Marketing
BSc APPAREL AND FASHION TECHNOLOGY (MINIMUM CREDITS TO BE EARNED: 158) |Code No. |Course |Hours / Week | |Maximum Marks | | | | | | | | | | |Credits |
Premium Textile Knitting
v Hari Balkrishna Joglekar v. Naro Moreshwar Joglekar ILR (1893) 18 Bom 342 Niranjan Shankar Golikari v Vancouver Malt and Sake Brewing Co. v. Vancouver Breweries Ltd. 1934 AC 181 Firm Daulat Ram v Krishna Rao v. Shankar (1954) 56 Bom LR 973 Hukmi Chand v
Premium Contract
Research proposal Report Eid Celebration & Managing Budget of Lower Income Family Submitted To: Mr. Tahir Iqbal Submitted By: Saima M younus MBA-III Abstract
Premium
WE tend to forget that our lifestyle and mindset have largely been influenced by our colonial past. The British influence has changed the way we look at ourselves and has stripped us of a confidence that comes naturally to a people belonging to an ancient and great civilisation. Colonisation coerces people from subordinated culture to denigrate themselves. A kind of a virtual reality is created to expedite this attitude of self-hate among the native population. An alternate reality is created
Premium India Mughal Empire British Raj
FACTS (Facts of case in brief) There are two parties in this case; the appellant is Kamil and brothers a registered partnership firm and the respondent is Central Dairy Farm‚ Uttar Pradesh Pashu Dhan Uddyog Nigam Limited. A contract is awarded to the appellant for the supply of 30000 live sheep and goats to the respondent @ Rs. 786/- per quintal. The contract was stipulated for a period of one year. The appellant deposited a sum of Rs. 260000/- as security for the good performance of the
Premium Court Appeal Appellate court