A SUMMER TRAINING PROJECT REPORT ON “ANALYSIS OF ANTI PEPSI BEHAVIOUR OF RETAIL OUTLETS” SUBMITED TOWARDS PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN MANAGEMENT SUBMITTED BY- PRADEEP PANKAJ SINGH PGDM(2008-10) ENROLMENT NO-2029742128. FACULTY GUIDE INDUSTRY GUIDE MR. VISHAL AGGARWAL MR. RAVEND BIJLANI ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Premium Pepsi
Coke vs. Pepsi Karmen Burrell AIU Online MKTG205-1004B-08 Unit 1 IP October 7‚ 2010 In assignment one we are asked to choose two competitive products to analyze how they address the 4 P’s of marketing. First‚ we must understand what the 4 P’s of marketing refers to. They are pricing‚ product‚ promotion‚ and placement of product. We are asked to describe the products‚ their industry‚ their market shares‚ and their fluctuation in sales. Now that we understand what the 4 P’s of marketing
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Cola
c. COLA WAR : THE CONCEPT d. RESEARCH PAPERS USED AS SECONDARY MATERIAL i. Coke Vs Pepsi fighting for foreign markets ii. Comparison between Coke and Pepsi iii. Brand Analysis : PepsiCo iv. Brand Analysis : Coca-Cola v. History of Coca-Cola : The best soda vi. Coke Vs Pepsi vii. Comparison between Coke and Pepsi viii. The rivalry of various fronts ix. Market share x. Indian scenario
Premium Coca-Cola
Chapter No. Chapter No-1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Need for the Study 1.3 Objective of the Study 1.4 Methodology 1.5 Limitations Chapter No-2 PEPSI COMPANY OVERVIEW 2.1 Genesis and Growth 2.2 Organization Structure 2.3 Production Function 2.4 HR Function 2.5 Finance Function 2.6 Marketing Function 2.7 Future Function Chapter No-3 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Details of the survey conducted 71 Chapter No-4 SUMMARY AND SUGGESTIONS 4.1 Summary 4.2 Findings 4.3 Suggestions
Premium Pepsi
A study on the various factors affecting consumer’s buying behaviour of Pepsi and its brand personification in Gurgaon. Submitted by Aamer Rushnaiwala Priyanka Kawatra Shakeb Khan Tanuj Arora Meenakshi Mishra Sudeepta Barua IILM INSTITUTE OR HIGHER EDUCATION‚ GURGAON Sector 53‚ DLF Golf Course Road‚ Gurgaon-122003 DECLARATION This report is submitted after thorough collection and analysis part for the subject Market Research undertaken in the fourth term from 1st February 2012 to
Premium Sampling Sample Stratified sampling
COLA WARS CONTINUE: COKE AND PEPSI IN 2006 The case is about the rivalry between two of the biggest companies in the world‚ Coca Cola and Pepsi. It is a battle which started in the early 1990s and which still characterizes the soft drink industry; but‚ as a former CEO of Pepsi said‚ it is a “battle without blood”: Coca Cola could not exist without Pepsi and the other way round. They mutually force each other to adapt their strategy to customers’ new needs‚ to apply competitive prices and to face
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola
and Swiss divisions of the company‚ meaning it will create a profit in the UK and therefore pay tax. Up until now‚ Starbucks has insisted that its UK business does not make a profit because of the high rents it pays for its shops. The coffee chain also uses a number of perfectly legal mechanisms to mitigate its tax payments. It pays a 4.7pc licensing fee to the Netherlands for image rights and use of the company’s coffee technology the british government was limited by the laws on paying
Premium Tax British Empire European Union
A Zara - What did we learn? The case examines Zara‚ or its parent Inditex‚ that has established a super quick response value chain system. Traditional apparel value chains take months before a fashion season begins‚ but Zara is able to observe what is hot (and what is not selling) and responds quickly on the up-to-date fashion trends. As a result of Zara’s outstanding results‚ Inditex has expanded into 40 countries by 2001. • A quick comparison (see Class PowerPoints for financial
Premium Depreciation Capital Capital accumulation
PepsiCo Inc.‚ profitability ratios | | | Dec 29‚ 2012 | Dec 31‚ 2011 | Dec 25‚ 2010 | Dec 26‚ 2009 | Dec 27‚ 2008 | Return on Sales | | Gross profit margin | 52.22% | 52.49% | 54.05% | 53.51% | 52.95% | Operating profit margin | 13.91% | 14.48% | 14.41% | 18.61% | 16.09% | Net profit margin | 9.43% | 9.69% | 10.93% | 13.75% | 11.89% | Return on Investment | | | | | | Return on equity (ROE) | 27.71% | 31.29% | 29.86% | 35.38% | 42.47% | Return on assets (ROA) | 8.28%
Premium Pepsi
bean supplier in East Asia. Indonesia’s biggest competitive advantages include its low cost‚ high production capacity (availability of supply)‚ efficient infrastructure and open trading/marketing system (business environment). Although the cocoa value chain in Indonesia has experienced phenomenal growth over the past few decades‚ its continued competitiveness is threatened by inconsistent and poor quality production. Widespread pest infestation‚ especially from the cocoa pod borer (CPB)‚ is a primary
Premium Chocolate Cocoa bean Cocoa butter