3344346 Tu Lan – 3282178 Bo Qiu - 3308317 DAVID JONES - BUSINESS ANALYSIS AND VALUATION May 2012 ASB INVESTMENT RESEARCH T A B L E O F CONTENT 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. DAVID JONES’ PROSPECT AND THE RETAIL INDUSTRY 2.1 INDUSTRY ANALYSIS 2.2 COMPANY ANALYSIS 3. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 3.1 ACCOUNTING ANALYSIS 3.2 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 4. FORECAST AND VALUATIONS 4.1 FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS 4.2 COST OF CAPITAL – WACC 4.3 VALUE OF DAVID JONES 5. CONCLUSION 6. REFERENCES AND APPENDIX ASB
Premium Financial ratios
INTRODUCTION On behalf Li & Partners consulting firm‚ we are pleased to present the strategic recommendation report. This reports divided into five sections. David Jones’ external and internal environments are discussed in the first two sections. The following section focuses on the identification of stakeholders and their interests. Our strategic recommendations to improve shareholder value are explained in the fourth section followed by the impact our recommendations have on stakeholders. A balance
Premium Retailing Stakeholder analysis Customer
1. Introduction The main purpose of this report is to analyse David Jones’ business performance and to determine whether it is a worthwhile investment. Two main points will be closely examined: classification of non-recurring items and recurring items‚ and ratio analysis. First‚ clarifying the generation of income made by ordinary activities and extraordinary activities will enable us to estimate the firm’s real earning power. Second‚ analysing historical financial data‚ using ratios‚ will enable
Premium Financial ratios
David Jones Ltd (DJS)‚ one of Australia’s oldest and most recognised department stores was founded in Sydney in 1838 and is a retailer of diversified products ranging from clothes to daily home products. This report’s purpose is to provide the David Jones’ Board and Senior Management advice through the assessment of SWOT‚ resources‚ capabilities and strategies with a Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Map as the measurement of the strategies. Part A-1: David Jones Strategic Analysis – SWOT STRENGTHS
Premium Brand
Analysis Of Sector Matrix For Ford Motor Company Marketing Essay Three tools are largely popular and relevant for analysing as well as prescribing remedies pertaining to the improvement of organisational performance. These are the Value Chain – propounded by Michael Porter‚ the Global Commodities Chain (GCC) Framework – put forward by Gary Gereffi and Miguel Korzeniewicz‚ and the Sector Matrix Theory – conceptualised by Julie Froud. This essay will aim at critically examining whether the sector
Premium Automotive industry Value chain Ford Motor Company
Cover Page | Student Name (no.) | Chan Ka Ki (157548)Lau Lai Ching (177146)Law Lam (177163)Sum Po Yan (177186)Tam Yu Ga Jan (177188)Wong Vicente Francisco (177200)Zhang ZiXin (177215) | Name of School | University of Tasmania (HKUE) | Unit Name | BMA2/302 Strategic Management | Assessment Item | Assessment Item 1 – Group Case Analysis 1 | Unit Coordinator | Dr Dallas Hanson | HK Lecturer’s Name | YF Lam | Due Date | 24 August 2013 | Date of Submission | 24 August 2013 | Otis
Premium
|BUSINESS ANALYSIS AND VALUATION | | | |DAVID JONES LTD | | | | | |BY SENIOR FINANCIAL
Premium Inventory Revenue Stock
Michael porter developed 3 generic strategies: cost leadership‚ differentiation and focus. They are developed to create a defendable position in the long-run‚ outperforming competition and establish a competitive advantage. However does the generic strategy lead to sustainable competitive strategy? This analysis will explain in detail. Cost leadership means setting out to become the low-cost producer of its industry. Each industry is different and provides with diverse problems. Cost leadership
Premium Strategic management Porter generic strategies Michael Porter
According to Michael C. Porter‚ the porter’s three (3) generic strategies are very important strategies‚ which can be applied to products and services in any industry or organization regardless of its size. The Three Porter’s Generic Strategies In order to gain competitive advantage‚ Michael Porter developed three generic strategies that a company could use; The Cost Leadership Strategy‚ The Differentiation Strategy and the Focus Strategy. These strategies have been used by various organizations to become
Premium Marketing Steve Jobs Porter generic strategies
Porter’s Generic Strategies Porter’s notion on “stuck in the middle” or “hole in the wall” is debatable‚ it being mutually exclusive. It might be true in some cases but not all the time. Even beyond Porter’s generic strategies‚ Toyota has been operating and already proven that it’s possible to be a low cost producer of a differentiated product. It was able to achieve leadership in North America‚ surpassing General Motors. They continuously find ways to reduce production costs and at the same optimize
Premium Strategic management Lean manufacturing Toyota Production System