carried out the slaughter of the Jews ruthless in nature or were they responding normally like any other human being when given an order by an authority figure? A movie titled A Few Good Men sheds light on this question with the help of Stanley Milgram and Philip Zimbardo’s research on obedience
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment A Few Good Men
One of Psychology’s Most Infamous Experiments). Stanley Milgram ran an experiment at yale that tested one’s willingness to follow orders from an . This experiment is more commonly known as the Milgram Experiment. Stanley Milgram randomly selected people who responded to the advertisement in the newspaper. Stanley had subject one in a room with him‚ and had another subject two sit in a room‚ that was not seen by subject one. Stanley Milgram ordered subject one to administer electric shocks to subject
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
conducted by Milgram (1963) on obedience have shown that if an individual is ordered to do something by someone who is perceived to be in power‚ it is possible that they will do it‚ even if it is something the person does not believe is right. Also‚ studies conducted by Zimbardo (1973) on deindividuation have shown that a normally healthy‚ intelligent person can lose their
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
Milgram’s aim was to research how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities‚ for example‚ Germans in WWII. (McLeod 2007) The first ethical dilemma with Milgram’s experiment is deception. The experimenter deceived the participants‚ who were made to believe that they were truly inflicting pain on the learners and were purposely put in a position of high stress
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
human beings in to a torturer. But‚ what would it take for me and you to act out such a horrific ordeal? Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram created an experiment that attempts to prove that evil can exist in what we would consider "normal" people. Milgram‚ wanted to see the extreme measures one would go to when a higher power of authority delivered an order. Milgram simulated an electric chair which an actor was told to pretend to act out in pain when a student was told to deliver current in to the
Premium Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse Iraq War Stanford prison experiment
Stanley Milgram was an American social psychologist whose research has been justified because of the knowledge psychologists have gained about why people obey. One of his most famous studies was conducted in 1963 on obedience. Obedience is compliance with an order‚ request‚ or law or submission to another’s authority. Milgram wanted to investigate why the German soldiers were very obedient to their authority figures and superiors and if that is an explanation for their mass killings in World War
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
The authors examine overt and subtle forms of stereotyping and prejudice. Two theories that explain overt prejudice are reviewed: realistic conflict theory and social identity theory. Although overt prejudice seems to have declined‚ subtle stereotyping is still pervasive. The authors review one theory‚ aversive racism theory‚ that explains this phenomenon. They also discuss two perspectives‚ attributional ambiguity and stereotype threat‚ which provide accounts of the impact of subtle racism
Premium Stereotype Social psychology Discrimination
real intention of a study from participants or taking steps to mislead them at the start. Milgram used the second ploy‚ deliberately lying to participants about the genuine reason for a study. He also used stooges and the use of stooges always means deception has been used. However‚ is deception necessary? Milgram would argue that his experiments could not have taken place without it. Imagine if Milgram had said at the start‚ ‘Mr Wallace is really a stooge‚ who will scream a bit but will receive
Premium Psychology Ethics Milgram experiment
Counterproductive Group Tendencies Interventions Making Interventions Work Key Theorists/Players: Sue DeWine “Value of Meetings” Roy Berko and Andrew & Darlyn Wolvin “Primary & Secondary Tension” Irving Janis (1971) “GroupThink” Solomon Asch “The Asch Effect” Judith Martin & Tom Nakayama (2010) also Steven Beebe‚ Susan Beebe and Diana Ivy (2001)“Ethnocentrism” Roger Mosvick & Robert Nelson (1996) “Inadequate/Hidden Agendas Katherine Adams & Gloria Galanes (2009) “Brainstorming”
Premium Asch conformity experiments Solomon Asch
has personally felt the conflict that can exist between different elements of a person’s identity. Quite simply‚ he writes that people “often see themselves in terms of whichever one of their allegiances is most under attack.” Asch C Solomon (1951) conducted research (the Asch experiment) to investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform. Apparently‚ people conform for two main reasons: because they want to fit in with the group and because they
Premium Conformity Asch conformity experiments Solomon Asch