One could also say that the close genetic similarity shared between testing animals and humans also attributes to altogether accurate results (“Animal”). On the contrary, this testing is not always reliable, and the impacts can be devastating. In the 1950s, a sleeping pill was released, claiming to be safe for pregnant women (“Science”). The result was 10,000 infants born with limb deformities. The end results of the pill were completely contradictory to the results of the animal tests. The formula was tested on pregnant mice, rats, cats, and hamsters, and still proved to be safe. Similarly, Vioxx, an arthritis medication, was tested on mice, and proved to protect the animal’s heart, as it should. But, the pill caused 27,000 heart related deaths, and heart attacks (“Animal”). This further illustrates that the difference in genetics between humans and animals makes animal testing not as reliable as some may
One could also say that the close genetic similarity shared between testing animals and humans also attributes to altogether accurate results (“Animal”). On the contrary, this testing is not always reliable, and the impacts can be devastating. In the 1950s, a sleeping pill was released, claiming to be safe for pregnant women (“Science”). The result was 10,000 infants born with limb deformities. The end results of the pill were completely contradictory to the results of the animal tests. The formula was tested on pregnant mice, rats, cats, and hamsters, and still proved to be safe. Similarly, Vioxx, an arthritis medication, was tested on mice, and proved to protect the animal’s heart, as it should. But, the pill caused 27,000 heart related deaths, and heart attacks (“Animal”). This further illustrates that the difference in genetics between humans and animals makes animal testing not as reliable as some may