Preview

Abraham Lincoln's Ideology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
913 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abraham Lincoln's Ideology
Lincoln had left the defunct Whig Party and joined the new Republican Party in 1856. This new national party was comprised of many former Whigs who opposed slavery The Republicans took a firm stand against slavery. They were dedicated to the repeal of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the prevention of the further extension of slavery westward. The new party also demanded the immediate admission of Kansas into the Union as a free state, which condemmed the Ostend Manifesto, which called for the annexation of Cuba (where slavery was legal), and called for federal support of internal improvements-especially the construction of a railroad to the Pacific.
Lincoln early work as president, was that slavery could remain in current slave states but could
…show more content…
In 1820, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise, which created Missouri as a slave state, and Maine as a free state, in order to preserve the balance of power between North and South. However, in 1854, the Missouri Compromise was revoked by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which specified that the issue of slavery would be decided by the settlers of each territory, an idea known as popular sovereignty. The Act was passed despite the best efforts of Abraham Lincoln, who railed against it in his “Peoria Speech.”
Lincoln was re-elected president in November of 1864. He wanted to preserve the unity of the country at any cost. A civil war broke out between the northern and southern states. He fought the war bravely and declared, ‘A Nation cannot exist half free and half slave.’ He won the war and kept the country united.

Abraham Lincoln saw many important events in American history following his election in 1861, such as the American Civil war, which began approximately a month after he was elected, and the creation of the Emancipation Proclamation. The American Civil War started on April 12th,
…show more content…
“In 1854,” he wrote in his narrative, “his profession had almost superseded the thought of politics in his mind, when the repeal of the Missouri compromise aroused him as he had never been before.”

When the northern victory finally came in April 1865, it was clear that the president had saved the Union, but not the Union of 1861. As the postwar amendments to the U.S. Constitution assured that Americans would never again permit slavery in their land (ABRAHAM LINCOLN: A LEGACY OF FREEDOM 2010)

The Emancipation Proclamation didn't immediately free any slaves because it only applied to territories not under Lincoln's control. The actual fact is that legal freedom for all slaves in the United States did not come until the final passage of the Thirteenth Amendment in December of 1865. Lincoln was elected to the Illinois legislature as Whig. In the aftermath of the 1854 elections, which showed the power and popularity of the movement opposed to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Lincoln declined to take his seat and instead sought election to the United States Senate. Lincoln abandoned the defunct Whig Party in favor of the Republicans. He was the first president from the Republican Party. His victory was entirely due to the strength of his support in the North and West; no ballots were cast for him in 10 of the 15 Southern slave states, and he won only two of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even if the Emancipation Proclamation abolished slavery for good, it would have hurt Lincoln. Lincoln's…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1860 Abraham Lincoln became the 16th president of the US. He was from Illinois and a member of the anti-slavery Republican Party. In December that same year, South Carolina, a slave state, seceded from the Union. Six more Southern states followed shortly after. The U. S. Civil War started in 1861 and that year Tennessee voters decided to secede from the Union and join the Confederacy. Johnson traveled…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The seceding of the South sparked controversy, and thus came the civil war. Abraham Lincoln served as president for 5 years. He served from 1861-1865. He was most famous for being a strong leader in the north and for leading the country during the civil war. He was a devout abolitionist and favored the Union.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1862, Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation. This document stated that the abolition of slavery was a goal for the North in the war. As the North won battles, they began to free slaves and ask them to join in battle against the south, increasing the size of their army, a major winning point for the…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His opening speech began: “A house divided against itself cannot stand, I believe this government cannot endure a half slave and half free.” He lost the election for senate but went on to become president, First in 1860 and re-elected in 1864. In both terms Lincoln was faced with the states seceding from the Union, his desire to end slavery, and then the Civil War. His political attributes of keeping the issue of slavery in the forefront, along with a divided union, his repeal of a section of the Missouri Compromise, the Emancipation Proclamation and his ideals of democracy, justice, fairness, the understanding of government funds appropriation and the knowledge of politics and the players allowed President Lincoln to strategically accomplish what was best for the people and the…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 4, 1861, when Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated into the presidency, he gave a speech that would express his desire to resolve the sectional tensions without warfare. He held this position because he felt he didn’t have the right to interfere with the South’s state rights, and by extension, their system of slavery. Unfortunately for Lincoln, the growing conflict between the North and the South wouldn’t be stopped and the Union entered the Civil War with the seceded Confederate states of the South in the second month of his presidency. As the war raged on and the damage it had on the Union was revealed, Lincoln decided the protecting the Union was more important than maintaining the Southern state’s rights. One of the first actions Lincoln…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act set the stage for what began “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the Civil War. As settlers began moving west of the Mississippi River, they moved into the area which is present-day Nebraska. Since the area was not yet a structured state, the people could not live there. The area that was wanted was located in a part of the United States that had outlawed slavery due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This, in turn, caused representatives in Congress to have no interest in creating a Nebraska territory. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was the driving factor behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. With the goal in mind that Nebraska would become a territory, the Kansas- Nebraska Act would allow each territory the ability to choose whether or not they supported slavery. With this being enacted, it was a direct violation of the Missouri Compromise. The bill that allowed territories to decide for or against slavery, also known as popular sovereignty, split the Whig party into two different groups; the northern Whigs and the southern Whigs with the northerners organizing the Republican Party.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lincoln believed that slavery was not morally right. The United States of America founders weren't sure how to address and word slavery. They did not write the actual word slavery in the constitution. Which made it difficult for Lincoln; because they included key clauses protecting the institution. Including a fugitive slave clause which did not allow slaves unless they were a federal property. Even Lincoln himself had no idea what to do. (5 Things You May Not Know About Lincoln, Slavery and Emancipation. (2012, September 21). Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://www.history.com/news/5-things-you-may-not-know-about-lincoln-slavery-and-emancipation)…

    • 1517 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was implicitly repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, submitted to Congress by Stephen A. Douglas in January 1854. The Act opened Kansas Territory and Nebraska Territory to slavery and future admission of slave states by allowing white male settlers in those territories to determine through "popular sovereignty" whether they would allow slavery within each territory. Thus, the Kansas-Nebraska Act effectively undermined the prohibition on slavery in territory north of 36°30′ latitude which had been established by the Missouri Compromise. This change was viewed by Free Soilers and many abolitionist Northerners as an aggressive, expansionist maneuver by the slave-owning South, and led to the creation of the Republican Party.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It allowed Missouri to be added as a slave state while Maine was established as a free state to maintain balance amongst the Union. This compromise was later negated by the Kansas-Nebraska Act put in place in 1854. According to Eric Foner, he states, “During the next two years, the Whig Party, unable to develop a unified response to the political crisis, collapsed. From a region divided between the two parties, the South became solidly Democratic... disgruntled Democrats, joined a new organization, the Republican Party, dedicated to preventing the further expansion of slavery” (Foner 512). Passed in 1854 The Kansas-Nebraska Act created a more sectional America because settlers could not determine the status of slavery among these territories by themselves. This led to events like Bleeding Kansas which was caused because when it came time to use their popular sovereignty to vote on whether to outlaw slavery or not people from other the states, like Missouri, would cross over the border and cast votes which led to elections being invalidated and having to be done over again on other days. Bleeding Kansas also led to many acts of violence that held political anti-slavery sentiments. However, the actual act itself states that it will leave the states “...created into a temporary government by the name of the Territory Nebraska; and... shall be received into the Union with or without slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the time of the admission…" (The Kansas- Nebraska Act). The act had went against the Missouri Compromise because Stephen A. Douglas passed this bill to give territorial governments to Kansas and Nebraska which had allowed them to use popular sovereignty to make their decisions. This negates the Missouri Compromise because it disrupted the balance of admitting every other state as a free state. Also, it…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Civil War took place on April 12,1861 through May 9,1865 an enormous battle between the North and the South that lasted from 1861 to 1865. Men in search for freedom from tyrannical rule, founded this nation on the belief that all men are created equal. Our Declaration of Independence, written in 1776, is based on this very statement. At this time in history Abraham Lincoln played a big role as he guided and preserved the United States though the Civil War, he also marked the American history by abolishing slavery, as well as trying establish equality for all mankind. Making the Civil War an unforgettable event that reunited the nation as well as changing America’s view on slavery.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1820 The Compromise in Missouri. In 1803, the Congress was obliged to come up with a policy to give way to the growth of slavery in the western region. Missouri’s request for statehood as a slave state sparked an unpleasant countrywide discussion. The Congress reached a succession of agreements that became known as the Missouri Compromise. Missouri was acknowledged as a slave state and Maine was acknowledged as a free state, conserving the Congressional balance.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Real Lincoln Analysis

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages

    However, Lincoln also was for new housing for free white people. This was land personally reserved for whites. The shut out blacks, in other words they were not allowed in. Alabama was one of these states. This is another example that shows Lincoln was opposed to slavery.…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two new parties formed were the Northern Democrats and the Southern Democrats. This election was the final event that caused the South to leave the Union which eventually led to the Civil War. On presidential election, Lincoln did very well in the northern states, and though he garnered less than 40 percent of the popular vote nationwide, he won a landslide victory in the electoral college. Even if the Democratic Party had not parted, it is likely Lincoln still would have won due to his strength in states heavy with electoral votes. Lincoln did not carry any southern states. The issue of secession was being talked about even before the 1860 election, and Lincoln's election intensified the move in the South to split with the Union. And when Lincoln was inaugurated on March 4, 1861, it seemed obvious that the nation was on an directed path toward war. Indeed, the Civil War began the next month with the attack on Fort…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise Of 1850

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Douglas in 1858. The Republicans charged that the Democrats wanted to legalize slavery in all the states not just in U.S. territory. They used this to attack many democrats, especially the sponsor of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Stephen A. Douglas. Illinois Republicans nominated Abraham Lincoln to challenge Stephen A. Douglas for his U.S. Senate seat. In his first campaign speech, he communicated how the North was afraid that the South wanted to expand slavery to the whole nation. He said, “A House divided against itself cannot stand,” which is from the Bible, “-I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved-I do not expect the house to fall-but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all other.” Abraham Lincoln said this in Springfield, Illinois, June 16,1858. They both had many debates throughout the year. They talked about the expansion of slavery. Lincoln was against the expansion of slavery. He said slavery was “a moral, a social, and a political wrong” and said that African Americans had rights under the Declaration of Independance, but he never said slavery should be abolished. Douglas said that popular sovereignty was the best way to address slavery because it was the most democratic. The Supreme Court said popular sovereignty was unconstitutional because people can not…

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays