Analysis of Ek Ruka Hua Faisla 1

Analysis Of: EK RUKA HUA FAISLA The main characters are:- And hence I have distinguished them in the following manner:- b) Punishing Parent (PP) Adult Ego State (AES) Child Ego State b) Adaptive Child (AC) I also used OBSERVED BEHAVIOURS to categorize the characters in the following manner:- Active Active Constructive (AC’) Active Destructive (AD) Passive {text:list-item} Consequently we can say that each juror had his own personal prejudices and biases, weaknesses, cultural differences, ignorance and fears that impaired their decision making skills and cause them to ignore the real issues of the case. Que 2) Team has powerful influence in effecting the change in the mindsets (values, belief, system, attitude, etc.) of its members. Explain giving suitable illustrations from the film. Ans. 2) A team can be divided as a group of people having a common vision, carrying out a specific task by following specific rules and protocols to achieve a common goal/mission/objective. In this movie 12 jury members are appointed by the court to discuss the case and reach to a consensus about the final decision of the case. Systems theorists have long believed that when individuals "merge into a group" something new is created. This called the GESTALT effect which says whole is much more powerful and effective than a part. This new entity, although comprised of individuals, is believed to be "greater than the sum of its parts" and thus the dynamic that is created within the group is not directly attributed to any one individual but rather the unique interrelationship between those individuals and the force that this interrelationship has on group functioning. Written below are the various benefits of teams, observed:- There were many instances when many of the jury members contradict each other and heated arguments usually followed these conflicts. But at the end everyone