Preview

Animal Experimentation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
922 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Experimentation
Animal Experimentation
Animal experimentation is the use of non-human animals in experiments. Millions of animals are used annually in laboratories to test in household products, medicine, make up, food additives, weaponry, and psychological experiments. Animal experimentation began with the Greeks in the third and fourth century BC with their curiosity of human bodily functions. Aristotle and Erasistratus were one of the first people to use animals for experiments. Galen, was Greek physician, was known as the “father of vivisection” and focused mainly on goats and monkeys after the church didn’t let him continue his experiments on human corpses. A vivisection is performed for experimental purposes on living organisms to study the internal living structure. Human vivisection has been a form of torture in the past. Avenzoar was the first to bring up animal testing as an experimental method by testing surgical procedures on animals before applying them to humans. Debates on whether animal experimentation has been around since the 17th century. First off, animal testing has led to many life saving cures and treatments. Herceptin and Tamoxifin were two valuable drugs used to treat breast cancer that has saved thousands of lives only capable with the research done in animal testing. Another animal testing pro is that there is no other living alternative whole body. Animals are used because they are living and they have many of the same organs as humans. We wouldn’t be able to cut up a plant and look at it’s inside to develop human body research, but we can with animals due to many of the same organs and living body. Another pro is that animals are similar to humans in many different ways. There are alike not only physically but also mentally. We both have similar instincts and we mentally process things the same way. Another pro is that animals are only used with for ethical reasons; we are not able to use human experiments. If the experiment could harm a human

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    “All living beings have an inherent value and that to use any animals for experimentation is evil” (Mur 8). This statement made by Tom Regan in Animal Experimentation takes a strong stand on the controversial topic of animal testing, but this assertion is justified through various examples and research. He also states how humans, or moral agents, are able to apply moral principles in decision making. Because of this ability, humans have a duty to uphold that morality on other humans as well as those with an inherent value, such as animals. Animal activists strongly support this idea, yet researchers use animals to implement experiments that they claim to be morally justified and beneficial to humanity. However,…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing is so painful for animals and they don't understand why they're being put through this pain. It is also very inhumane and morally offensive. Animal testing is cruel and an inhumane way to torture animals for mankind's own benefit. There have been millions of animals that have suffered a vicious, painful death in the name of research. Lastly there are alternatives to Animal Testing such as computer modeling, As science continues to transform our world beyond what we know, and technology continues to transform and expand upon what we depend on. Medical research and testing will also transition to embrace and…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first reason why we shouldn’t have animal testing is because animals are getting hurt or abused. “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year.” The chemicals that the people are using are burning or other worse things to them. The chemicals that they use on the animals could hurt or kill them. Over half of side effects cannot be detected in…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Others believe that animal testing has “contributed to many lifesaving cures and treatments.” According to (Animal Testing) “The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals.” Some people are highley for animal testing for this reason. One believes that animals are the reason why we are still here today, just based on the fact that we could run experiments and learn new things. One also believes that there is no other way to test on a whole-body system besides humans. Some even say that animal testing is beneficial to the animals, thus saying that humans can help the animals when they experiment and test on…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imagine a young girl, sitting in her dinning room with her loving family. She is about to partake in her mother’s famous lasagna, when suddenly, huge creatures burst into the room and grab the little girl and her family. The leering eyed creatures stuff the innocent family into cages, too small for their bodies, and shove them into vans. As the girl’s last days roll by she watches both herself and her family being treated like “tens of millions of animals hidden in laboratories on college campuses and research facilities being dissected, infected, injected, gassed, burned and blinded.” (“The truth about…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first reason animal testing is not good, is that it harms animals. According to Ian Murna, after research the animals are killed. Animal testing gets animals sick. It gets animals sick because some of the drugs that the scientists use for animals may not be healthy for them (Animal testing 101). The world is so nervous about animals going extinct, then why do we use them for testing then? Animals are kept in small cages (Animal testing 101). Animals need to move around just like humans, how is that fair to them, animals have feelings just like humans.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many changes implemented to change something within an organization are implemented with minimal attention given to the resistance that generally occurs during the implementation, and the human aspects of change. Managers show slight understanding about the serious role that the human aspects have in influencing the change transition phase. Usually, managers focus on the technical and operational aspects of change initiatives within their organizations.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joel Chandler Harris was born in Eatonton, Georgia on December 9, 1845 to single mother Mary Ann Harris. His father deserted the family shortly after Harris’s birth. They were never married, and his illegitimate birth haunted Harris for his life. A local doctor named Dr. Andrew Reid befriended Mary Ann Harris and her young son. He allowed them to live in a small cottage behind his mansion. Mary Ann Harris encouraged her son to read extensively, especially Oliver Goldsmith’s Vicar of Wakefield.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The term "animal testing" refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals. All procedures, even those classified as “mild,” have the potential to cause the animals physical as well as psychological distress and suffering. Often the procedures can cause a great deal of suffering. Most animals are killed at the end of an experiment, but some may be re-used in subsequent experiments. Here is a selection of common animal procedures:…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    animal testing

    • 1183 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle and Erasistratus were the first two early Greek physician-scientist performed experiments on living animals. In 1859, Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory reinforced the conception that animals could serve as models for humans in the study of biology and physiology. Animal testing plays a large important role in pharmaceutical and medical advances, but many question the mortality of such use of the animal’s life. More than 100 million aninals are used for testing every single year. Animal testing has brought a lot of positive and negative outcome and there are many different opinions regarding it.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Animal Testing

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animals everyday are suffering in laboratories because of animal testing. Animal testing is a horrible thing, even though it has lead to some medical breakthroughs. Although there better alternative options. If you weigh the pros and cons to animal testing it is clear that animal testing is wrong, even if there have been outcomes that have turned out well. Even though animal testing can help create cures, they have shorter life cycles, and sometimes finding cures for them, vitro testing, animals suffering, and the animals being extremely different from humans are all reasons why animal testing is a horrible thing.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Millions of animals are used in biomedical experiments every year. Testing is used by scientist worldwide to find causes and treatments for thousands of medical conditions(2facts.com). Without animal testing causes and treatments to thousands of medical conditions would not be known. We would still live with polio if it wasn't for animal testing. Animal testing helped find the cures for polio, small pox, rabies, etc(2facts.com). If it wasn't for the monkey that was first injected with the polio disease the may never have been discovered. The injection was proven safe so it was used to save millions of lives.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Approximately, more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year (Humane Society International, 2010). Animals, from the fruit fly to the mouse, are widely used in scientific research. Research is critical for the advancement of medicine, leading to increased chances of survival from diseases and improved strategies to prevent them. Without animal experiments, transplants, diseases, cancer, and vaccines would not have been advanced. The use of animals can be inevitable, particularly in conditions that require first-hand understanding of biochemical processes in and outside the body. Therefore, animals should be used for scientific research.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While some think that animal testing is useful, others think it should be stopped, and here I’m about to tell you a few reasons of why they think that. First, animal testing is cruel. Animals are strapped down to tables, and stabbed with needles time and time again. Many animals have died from being tested on, without any say in the matter. As Orlans says, the animals suffer from "vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, convulsion, and internal bleeding. Since death is the required endpoint, dying animals are not put out of their misery by euthanasia". Secondly, animal testing has no benefits to humans. The pain they suffer from is no use to humans, especially if the treatments don’t work. "The American Veterinary Medial Association defines animal pain…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal testing is cruel, unnecessary, and disgusting. The results of most animal tests are rarely relevant to humans and are not reliable. It is unneeded in today’s society, considering our technological advancements. More accurate and scientifically superior methods are available, usually costing less and even being quicker to perform. There are methods such as using blood from human volunteers, using artificial human skin (proven by the National Cancer Institute to be a perfect substitute), human cell-based toxicity screenings, microdosing, etc.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays