Preview

Animal Pain In T. S. Lewis The Problem Of Pain

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
729 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Pain In T. S. Lewis The Problem Of Pain
I must admit that I do not fully understand why Lewis chose to include a chapter about animal pain in this book. To me it has no value in his argument about why Man must suffer the problem of pain, and seems to not expand the subject at all. While I find this chapter unnecessary, I cannot honestly say that upon further readings, discussions or thoughts, that my opinion will not change, but that at the present time this chapter seems wholly out of place in his argument.
Lewis closes the book with a chapter on Heaven, affirming that “a book on suffering which says nothing of heaven, is leaving out almost the whole of one side of the account. Scripture and tradition habitually put the joys of heaven into the scale against the sufferings of earth, and no solution of the problem of pain which does not do so can be called a Christian one” (p.148). He contends that nowadays, we are very timid about mentioning heaven, afraid of the ridicule about ‘pie in the sky’ and dreaming of a happy world elsewhere, escaping our duty to make this world a happier place. Lewis postulates, “But either there is "pie in the sky" or
…show more content…
I feel that his arguments would not sway someone who does not believe in the basics of Christianity, such as an atheist. Lewis, instead of answering some questions raised, from an opposite view of his, simply chooses to decline to give voice to these opposing arguments. In my opinion his argument would have benefitted from him expressing his views on these positions, rather than just avoiding them. I found this frustrating, that he quickly dismissed this views, in sections of the book. Again I would like to express that the chapter on animal pain provided, to me, no furtherance of his central argument, but would like to state that I will revisit this section, and do some research on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Lewis was a British writer who lived during the early 20th century. Lewis was originally an atheist who set out disprove Christianity. He quickly learned that Christianity and the story of Jesus were true, so he became a Christian author in order to spread the gospel of Jesus. Lewis was an extremely influential man; his articles had a massive impact worldwide. As previously stated, The Great Divorce is a tremendous rebuttal of the book, Marriage of Heaven and Hell. Throughout the book, Lewis makes it crystal clear that Heaven and Hell are not one and the same. Since the book is written in the form of a story, it is ideal for the less educated reader to understand and appreciate. Even though on a fundamental level it is a story, as the book is unwrapped and examined, many theological concepts are found. These abstruse concepts attract and sustain the attention of the well-educated reader. Lewis does a fantastic job at capturing the attention of a wide range of audiences. Another brilliant aspect of the book is Lewis’ word choice and use of imagery. Through entirety of the book, Lewis guides the reader on a journey of the landscape with the use of his words and imagery. Whether it be in the grey town, the entrance of heaven, or the ever-distant mountains, the reader can almost physically grasp the landscape detailed in the book, thanks to Lewis. One of the negative aspects of the book was the lack of theological originality. Lewis did not present any new theological concepts or even any new opinions on any theological concepts in the book. He only gathered information and put it into story form. Had he added some new ideas, it would have greatly increased the quality of the…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In C.S Lewis’s celebrated book Mere Christianity he writes the following: “I am trying here to prevent anyone from saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: 'I'm ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don't accept his claim to be God.' That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic—on a level with a man who says he is a poached egg or else he would be the Devil of hell. You must make your choice.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Screwtape Letters Summary

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lewis is perceived as a classical writer. He has shown a side to mankind that really was never meant to read I feel. In the way he brought this story to life it was like it escaped somehow from hell and brought to the public eye in a sense. So now because this was brought to people attention they know more about the temptations in life. C.S. Lewis brought that to life the things the devil does not want people to know about. The things that make us or break us from our faith and make them turn their backs on their own faith. The Screwtape Letters is a very insightful book that challenges people to think outside the box. It Challenges their assumptions about the world and eternity. C.S. Lewis points out valid points about the way people think today and how human behave every day. The Screwtape Letters was a book brought to the world way before its time C.S. Lewis came up with an amazing story to bring out the way people are tempted and also to see it in the other way so to speak. God as an enemy was something I never saw before but the ways people can be persuaded and tempted by life is something you deal with in…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yong Summary

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The event related to animal rights that motivate Ed Yong to write this article is the Great Ape Project. The Great Ape Project was established in 1993 and requests a basic set of moral and legal rights for great apes. The questions that were raised by Yong about this issue are why can’t all nonhuman animals that feel pain have rights. Another question Yong has is what would be the credible reason not to…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lewis begins to understand God, and his grief a little better. He starts to realize that his own mind and ways are flawed not God’s. Lewis comes to the conclusion that, “If there is a good God, then these tortures are necessary. For no even moderately good Being could possibly inflict or permit them if they weren’t”. If God is not good, then God does not exist. For any torture that occurs, occurs for the betterment of God’s children. Without these tortures we could not experience his wholesome love. If the tortures mean nothing, then there must be no God at all. The gracious God that we have, would not inflict pain on us with no reason behind it. I have to believe, if I believe in God, that there is a reason behind all of this. If it is all meaningless then there can be no God, because that would defeat the very purpose of God. We can never experience the love that God has for us in full, until we have experienced suffering in our own lives. It is the suffering that makes His love so…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mere Christianity is a book written by C.S. Lewis, the book has four major sections that break down the author’s, take on what Christianity is and how it may best be practiced in life. The book does not pick sides between the different denominations within Christianity, the intent of the book is to express the common views inherent in all the various denominations of Christianity, that are often forgotten in the debates about where these different sects disagree; this paper will take you through the various points that Lewis made in his logical, well-crafted centrist argument and I will explain my thoughts about what he was trying to say.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Re "A Change of Heart About Animals," Commentary, Sept. 1: Jeremy Rifkin argues that science has shown that the differences between animals and humans are less than we think and that we should exte…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think this shows how the animals had made a definite decision of rebellion towards humans and Mr. Jones.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Bill of Rights

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The last reason that animals don’t need a Bill of Rights, is that humans come first over animals with low cognitive ability. For example, they talk about how a fish can remember its path to run away from predators. But that doesn’t prove that they feel pain and shows that they really aren’t smart at all. They say, “they can learn geometrical relationships and landmarks”(Braithwaite). Another reason is that we haven’t even defined pain for ourselves,…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Connell’s central idea develops through the dynamic characterization of Rainsford, “Rainsford did not smile. ‘I am still a beast at bay,’ he said, in a low, hoarse voice” (Connell 314). At the beginning of the story, Rainsford reasons with his hunting partner that animals are…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lewis died as a young man during the peak of his fame, but how exactly did he die? Lewis was an explorer and governor of the state of Louisiana at the time. He went on the Lewis and Clark Expedition and was Jefferson’s right-hand man, helping him prove Congress wrong, saying that they should’ve bought Louisiana for economic and other purposes. As for his death, historians have claimed that he committed suicide while at Grinder’s Stand for over 200 years. However, as we now look back, there are many holes in this claim. Lewis was a superstar back in the day, but he also had struggles and enemies of his own. Lewis died by murder by conspiracy.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He bends his mind away from the idea of being human and visualize himself as being an animal. While doing this, he comes up with a lot things that this animal may be feeling and one of them is pain. “They were suffering, every fiber of my body reached toward that stifled pain, that stiff torment from the bottom of the tank”(Cortazar, 40). The narrator thought of their situation, of being caged in a tank full of water that doesn’t flow and the fact that the axolotl doesn’t go anywhere or do anything but stare at him for a very long time. The narrator doesn’t mention him staring at multiple axolotls either. It’s just this one axolotl that he stares at for a long time and physically, mentally and emotionally connects with…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It was not until the 1800s where the respect for animal rights had grew due to the influence of Jeremy Bentham; who helped changed the minds of people towards their views and treatment of animals. He had made a case for his perspective on this particular issue by implementing his ethical utilitarianism to animals—and his definition of utilitarianism is “the greatest happiness or greatest felicity principle” (Nietzche 1). Bentham furthers his argument when he made the claim that “our laws should grant animals the right not to be inflicted with suffering” (Fieser 1). This society has come to a point where most people have become blind to the constant pain and struggles that animals have to go through on an everyday basis. From one great mind to another—Peter Singer had and has continued to advocate on the issues of animal rights, animal feeding operations and animals in research through his talks at various different universities and also his website. Many of what Peter Singer mentions throughout his argument I agree to a certain extent. The agreement lies upon Singers strong remarks towards animal experimentation and how negative it has been, but through the mist of this, I would still have to say that, although these experiments have been cruel in…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this chapter, he stated that the heaven of this world is in our breast. One who does not conquer the heaven in the world will never be able to enter the heaven in the next world. He criticized people who are really wasteful for chasing the worldly matters for happiness without testing the sweetness of the heaven in this world. People can only taste the greatness of the heaven in the earth by submitting their heart for the blessings of the God solely. When their heart are mostly conquered by the remembrance of God, the heaven in the next world will pleasurably waiting for them. From my point of view, I agree with his argument as our actions are mainly started with our soul. The heart or soul act as a king that control our behavior, attitude and intention. If we manage to take care of our soul, we basically has achieve the ultimate purpose of our life which is to be blessed in this life as well as the life in the next…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays