Lewis argued, believing Jesus to be only a good teacher is not an option. Jesus clearly and undeniably proclaimed himself to be the son of God. If He is not God, then He is a fabricator, and therefore not a prophet, moral teacher, or godly man. In efforts to enlighten the words of Jesus, neo intellectuals claim the true chronological Jesus did not say numerous things that the Bible attributes to Him. Who are we to say that God’s scripture regarding what Jesus did or did not say is true? How can a “academic” thousands of years detached from Jesus have superior insight into what Jesus did or did not say than those who lived with, served with, and were taught by Jesus …show more content…
Jesus was so many things over the course of his life. Instead examine the importance of the question “Who is Jesus” and why his true identity so important? Why does it matter if Jesus is the one true son? The most significant reason being that if Jesus is not God’s only begotten son, His death would have not been sufficient to pay the penalty for the transgressions of the whole world (1 John 2:2). Only God could offer payment for such an unbounded penalty. Jesus had to be God’s son so that He can pay for our iniquities. Jesus had to be a man so He could die; Jesus was a friend so that he may be grieved. Jesus was who he was, all of these things “I Am Who I Am” (Exodus