Arguments Against Genetically Modified Organisms
Genetically Modified Organisms
Genetically modified Organisms (GMOs) has become a popular topic nationwide. The argument of whether it is ethical to use biotechnology to develop crops has been debated back and forth. However, GMOs have been proven time and time again that they can increase food production, lower costs, and decrease damage on the environment.
The increased use of pesticides and fertilizers on plants over the years have made a big impact on the environment. These harmful chemicals are sprayed on our food to try and increase food production, but it also damages the humans and animals that consume these products. These chemicals have been traced back to be the cause of health hazards such as headaches, nausea, and even a increased risk of cancer and reproductive harm. (The Problem with Pesticides) Fertilizers have also contributed to the dead zone in the gulf of mexico and the black sea, because of the nutrient overload in these areas it has caused many organisms to die and has made these areas nearly uninhabitable. However, with the advance in technology, scientist have been able to make plants naturally resistant to pests, without the harmful use of chemicals. …show more content…
It is also thought to be more expensive to modify these plants. However, this is not true because humans have been modifying food for centuries, by selectively breeding only the best plants. For the past 40 years scientists have been changing the DNA of crops to make them stronger. These foods have been consumed for the past 40 years and no health risk can be directly linked back to GMOs. (What Science Really Says About GMOS) Biotechnology has even made GMOs healthier and stronger than the natural plant, because of this the number of plants lost to herbicide is decreasing exponentially causing more food to be produced and the prices of food worldwide to go
Genetically modified Organisms (GMOs) has become a popular topic nationwide. The argument of whether it is ethical to use biotechnology to develop crops has been debated back and forth. However, GMOs have been proven time and time again that they can increase food production, lower costs, and decrease damage on the environment.
The increased use of pesticides and fertilizers on plants over the years have made a big impact on the environment. These harmful chemicals are sprayed on our food to try and increase food production, but it also damages the humans and animals that consume these products. These chemicals have been traced back to be the cause of health hazards such as headaches, nausea, and even a increased risk of cancer and reproductive harm. (The Problem with Pesticides) Fertilizers have also contributed to the dead zone in the gulf of mexico and the black sea, because of the nutrient overload in these areas it has caused many organisms to die and has made these areas nearly uninhabitable. However, with the advance in technology, scientist have been able to make plants naturally resistant to pests, without the harmful use of chemicals. …show more content…
It is also thought to be more expensive to modify these plants. However, this is not true because humans have been modifying food for centuries, by selectively breeding only the best plants. For the past 40 years scientists have been changing the DNA of crops to make them stronger. These foods have been consumed for the past 40 years and no health risk can be directly linked back to GMOs. (What Science Really Says About GMOS) Biotechnology has even made GMOs healthier and stronger than the natural plant, because of this the number of plants lost to herbicide is decreasing exponentially causing more food to be produced and the prices of food worldwide to go