Preview

Assignment # 5 Terms of a contract

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
403 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assignment # 5 Terms of a contract
No. John Hunt went to the McIlory Bank and Trust to see if he could get a long term loan for the S.B.H Farms. He talked to a loan officer about getting a long-term loan for building hog houses, buying livestock, and for expanding the farm operations. The McIlory Bank and Trust agreed to loan him $175,000.00 on short term promissory notes which all the owners of S.B.H. Farms had to sign. While all the owners of S.B.H. Farms were at the bank, they had an oral discussion about the long-term loans for the farm. With no set amount, no interest rates, or how much to pay when the long-term loan is due. When the promissory notes were due the S.B.H. Farms did not make their payment as they said, and the loans went into default. The McIlory Bank and Trust put in a claim to take the collateral away because of default on the loans. S.B.H. Farms did a countersuit against the McIlory Bank and Trust saying that they breached the oral contract and for $750,000.00 in damages. I personally think that the S.B.H. Farms did not think they would default on the loan when they took the loan out. They thought they had a long-term loan to be able to better their farm and make more money. They did as much as they could get the farm expanded, but it was not enough to help them with the loans. I think that the McIlory Bank and Trust and S.B.H. Farms should have had more talk about the long-term loan, and had set an amount with the interest rate and when the loan would be due. S.B.H. Farms would not have lost all the collateral that they had put up for the loan. Now they probably could not get a loan like that again until they got their credit score back up again. In addition, the court stated that there was no way that it could take the general terms discussed between Hunt and the bank and be asked to enforce the contract without supplying the necessary terms essential to the formation of the contract. Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment in favor of the Bank was affirmed. Hunt v.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During a transaction, CNAC observed that Holberg had breached the contract and as a result decided to sue. CNAC and Holberg presented the contract between them to the trial court of Houston, Texas. CNAC pointed out the provision Holberg had breached, and though Holberg attempted to refute the claims, it was clear and apparent the contract had been violated. After careful review by the trial court, the judge awarded CNAC $94,304.79 as well as the additional expenditures accumulated as a result of the trial.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1997 Brandon borrowed funds from Johnson Bank (the “Bank”). Brandon’s owners signed all the necessary paperwork and personally guaranteed a $5 million term loan and a $4 million line of credit. Brandon agreed to make monthly payments for the term loan and pay the full balance by June…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History: This case first stated in 1981 on March 10, when Randy Hyland son of Mervin Hyland went into the bank and sat down with William Buck and executed two promissory notes. One for $6,800 and one for $3,000,…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case Reeves v. Ernst & Young there was an agricultural cooperative entitled Security the Farmer’s Cooperative of Arkansas and Oklahoma that numerous members (23,000). In order to raise money to support its general business operations, they sold to investors promissory notes that were payable upon demand. This note was showcased to all including members and non-members and noted that it was an “investment program” and offered higher interest rates. Co-op accumulated more than 1,600 people that purchased the notes, totaling $10 million but later Co-op filed for bankruptcy. There was a law suit filed by a class of holders stating that there was a violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When considering the…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Siegel v. New England Merchants National Bank, 386 Mass. 672, 437 N.E.2d 218, Web 1982…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Outlines

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court ultimately ruled with the defendant. The main reason was the language of the contract. The terms and conditions were too specific and definite to rule any other way but in the favor of Billy Cannon, as the absence of the Commissioner’s contract was…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    OUTCOME: The court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, finding no abuse of discretion in the reduction of the duration of a covenant not to compete against appellee, former employee, where hardship to appellee by reinstatement of the expired injunction was a more onerous burden than was required to protect the business of appellant.…

    • 322 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is easy to look back and say what were these people thinking but when you take a closer look at some of the biases involved involved the borrowers, the lenders and the investors are to blame. The system just seemed to lack the necessary checks and balances and finally spun out of control. In the end the borrowers, the highly leveraged banks and the investors (Giant Pool of Money) all lost. By failing to recognize and adjust for these biases people continued down a very slippery slope. This story serves as a great example of how biases can have major large scale negative impacts in our…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Loans were made on the security of the person and failure to repay by the due date would result in the borrowers and their family to be liable for seizure. Land was owned by few.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    an obscure report, but a federal judge upheld the deal as the fulfillment of a valid legal contract.…

    • 4962 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hussein

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Application: Under the contract of Mitigation of Damages, when a breach of contract occurs, the innocent injured party is usually held to a duty to mitigate or reduce the damages that he or she suffers. In this case, VanHorn suffers from the contract that Barton breached.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The executive Power will be entrusted in a single President of the United States of America. He will hold his Office for a Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Detrimental Reliance

    • 2785 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The case of Condrey v. SunTrust Bank of Georgia, 431 F. 3d 191- Court of Appeals, 5th…

    • 2785 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contract Law

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The respondent is unable to justify the violations of Section 8 and 10 of the canadian charter of rights and freedoms (charter) with regards to section 24 (2) of the charter. Section 24 (2) states that where in proceedings under section (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that did not infringe or deny any rights of freedoms guaranteed by the charter, the evidence shall not be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute (charter).…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constructive Discharge

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As you asked, I have researched the claim of constructive discharge by former employee Emily Watson. Ms. Watson is claiming that she had no choice but to resign based on the fact that she was scheduled to work Sundays. According to Ms. Watson, this is an infringement on her religious beliefs and she is claiming discrimination and constructive discharge based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays