During a transaction, CNAC observed that Holberg had breached the contract and as a result decided to sue. CNAC and Holberg presented the contract between them to the trial court of Houston, Texas. CNAC pointed out the provision Holberg had breached, and though Holberg attempted to refute the claims, it was clear and apparent the contract had been violated. After careful review by the trial court, the judge awarded CNAC $94,304.79 as well as the additional expenditures accumulated as a result of the trial.…
In 1997 Brandon borrowed funds from Johnson Bank (the “Bank”). Brandon’s owners signed all the necessary paperwork and personally guaranteed a $5 million term loan and a $4 million line of credit. Brandon agreed to make monthly payments for the term loan and pay the full balance by June…
History: This case first stated in 1981 on March 10, when Randy Hyland son of Mervin Hyland went into the bank and sat down with William Buck and executed two promissory notes. One for $6,800 and one for $3,000,…
In the case Reeves v. Ernst & Young there was an agricultural cooperative entitled Security the Farmer’s Cooperative of Arkansas and Oklahoma that numerous members (23,000). In order to raise money to support its general business operations, they sold to investors promissory notes that were payable upon demand. This note was showcased to all including members and non-members and noted that it was an “investment program” and offered higher interest rates. Co-op accumulated more than 1,600 people that purchased the notes, totaling $10 million but later Co-op filed for bankruptcy. There was a law suit filed by a class of holders stating that there was a violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When considering the…
Siegel v. New England Merchants National Bank, 386 Mass. 672, 437 N.E.2d 218, Web 1982…
The court ultimately ruled with the defendant. The main reason was the language of the contract. The terms and conditions were too specific and definite to rule any other way but in the favor of Billy Cannon, as the absence of the Commissioner’s contract was…
OUTCOME: The court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, finding no abuse of discretion in the reduction of the duration of a covenant not to compete against appellee, former employee, where hardship to appellee by reinstatement of the expired injunction was a more onerous burden than was required to protect the business of appellant.…
It is easy to look back and say what were these people thinking but when you take a closer look at some of the biases involved involved the borrowers, the lenders and the investors are to blame. The system just seemed to lack the necessary checks and balances and finally spun out of control. In the end the borrowers, the highly leveraged banks and the investors (Giant Pool of Money) all lost. By failing to recognize and adjust for these biases people continued down a very slippery slope. This story serves as a great example of how biases can have major large scale negative impacts in our…
A. Loans were made on the security of the person and failure to repay by the due date would result in the borrowers and their family to be liable for seizure. Land was owned by few.…
an obscure report, but a federal judge upheld the deal as the fulfillment of a valid legal contract.…
Application: Under the contract of Mitigation of Damages, when a breach of contract occurs, the innocent injured party is usually held to a duty to mitigate or reduce the damages that he or she suffers. In this case, VanHorn suffers from the contract that Barton breached.…
The executive Power will be entrusted in a single President of the United States of America. He will hold his Office for a Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:…
The case of Condrey v. SunTrust Bank of Georgia, 431 F. 3d 191- Court of Appeals, 5th…
The respondent is unable to justify the violations of Section 8 and 10 of the canadian charter of rights and freedoms (charter) with regards to section 24 (2) of the charter. Section 24 (2) states that where in proceedings under section (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that did not infringe or deny any rights of freedoms guaranteed by the charter, the evidence shall not be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute (charter).…
As you asked, I have researched the claim of constructive discharge by former employee Emily Watson. Ms. Watson is claiming that she had no choice but to resign based on the fact that she was scheduled to work Sundays. According to Ms. Watson, this is an infringement on her religious beliefs and she is claiming discrimination and constructive discharge based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.…