Audience Analysis In The American Speech

1. What was the goal of the speech? To encourage and empower the American public that their opportunities are endless, to live freely and chase your dreams, and everyone is equal and that America will continue to be great and it is greater than other countries.
Was the goal ethically sound? How do you know? Yes. He wanted the American public to know that he had their best interest at heart and that he would live by that code. He referred to the constitution.
Was the speaker fully prepared? How do you know? Yes, he was well prepared. He made very good contact with the audience. His speech was fluent and every point flowed well into each other.
Was the speaker honest in what was said? How do you know? Yes. He had knowledge. He knew the law and
How do you know? Yes. Apart from the fact that she was talking about her husband’s achievements she also stated quotes that his colleagues stated about him which shows you that she was indeed honest.
How did the speaker use audience analysis in the content of the speech? The speaker knew the type of audience she was speaking to. She took into consideration their occupation and their age and gave her speech based on the appropriate level.
What was the tone of the speech? The Speech was formal and very engaging and cheerful.
What details of the speech suggested to you that none of the speech was plagiarized? Every time she quoted someone’s word she would give credit to the source (the person). This way she avoided
What was the goal of the speech? The goal was to encourage everyone to vote. The goal of the other part of the video was to encourage everyone to support drug testing for high school athletes.
Was the goal ethically sound? How do you know? Yes. She wanted everyone particularly the college students to whom she is referring to, to vote because it could affect their lives in the future. She wanted to let them know that it was important. For the other part of the video, yes because he wanted to let everyone know that drugs can be harmful to athletes and that he has various solutions for the problem.
Was the speaker fully prepared? How do you know? No. Although it is not wrong to use a few notes. She did not engage fully with the audience. Her focus was more on what was on the paper. For the other part of the video, he was neither fully prepared. He did not engage fully with the audience. His focus was also on his notes. They both could have been a little more prepared.
Was the speaker honest in what was said? How do you know? Yes. People do need to vote because they determine the future. She gave the reason that it could affect their future and she conducted a survey to firmly ground her topic. For the other part of the video, Yes. Enhancing drugs are dangerous for athletes. To have solutions for the problems also showed that he was honest and determined to let everyone know how serious a problem it