Biotechnology In Foods Persuasive Essay
The public’s unwillingness to comply with scientific prescriptions in regard about new technologies is due to public ignorance and media irresponsibility. The food biotechnology introduces a risk to the environment and human health from the results of the increase in antibiotic resistance and other unintended effects. They have the ability to overcome physiological barriers through an exchange of genetic materials in living organisms. In Brian Wynne’s journal article, he argues on the contradiction of technology associated with the GMOs. Biotechnology can be used for greater production in crops and foods, however, people want to protect their health and the environment they live in. Artificial selection plays a huge role in the biotechnologies
…show more content…
that take out undesirable traits unnaturally through the process of plant breeding. In the evolution of living organisms and plants, genetically engineered foods go beyond what nature can actually. In other words, making the impossible, possible. The author further explains the public perceptions on GMOs while taking on a social scientific perspective. The public perceptions show a negative side in regard to GMOs (Wynne, 2001, P. 447). They are mainly concerned about the long-term health effects from genetically engineered and processed foods. It is the media that society becomes dependent on their interpretation of information about biotechnology (Wynne, 2001, P. 463). When biotechnology was introduced, society evaluates it through public opinions and judgements. In a way, the public perception has contributed to shifting public policies. This has created an negative image on GMOs, which are thought of as dangerous and unnatural. Scientists have written about their researches, however, the complex language of scientists was not understood by the public. The miscommunication between the two shows the causality tenet of the Strong Programme of Scientific Knowledge, which is concerned about the state of knowledge. The public perception and scientific view about the risks of GMOs has resulted in a communication problem.
Genetically modified organisms are alive and present in our society.
They have taken control of the crops and foods that consumers show great concern in this issue of biotechnology in foods. Thus, these GMOs should be taken with precautions and avoiding unintended harm to the environment and human health. Although there may be some benefits to GMOs, we should always be safe when assessing GM foods so that no one would be affected. Consumers argue that they should have the right to labelling in foods, however, there are already laws and regulations that exist that are able to maintain production and assess any risks in genetically engineered foods. The principle of reflexivity would be applied to the regulation of labelling. Individuals with low reflectivity would result in being shaped by society and following the public perceptions on the negative thoughts on GMOs. However, individuals with high reflectivity would shape their own norms and desires through the continuous production of GM foods as being safe to consume and to the human health. Through research, it can be seen that GMO foods are controversial and have ongoing debates in biotechnology, but these controversies are still unanswered and continue to take on many
perceptions.
that take out undesirable traits unnaturally through the process of plant breeding. In the evolution of living organisms and plants, genetically engineered foods go beyond what nature can actually. In other words, making the impossible, possible. The author further explains the public perceptions on GMOs while taking on a social scientific perspective. The public perceptions show a negative side in regard to GMOs (Wynne, 2001, P. 447). They are mainly concerned about the long-term health effects from genetically engineered and processed foods. It is the media that society becomes dependent on their interpretation of information about biotechnology (Wynne, 2001, P. 463). When biotechnology was introduced, society evaluates it through public opinions and judgements. In a way, the public perception has contributed to shifting public policies. This has created an negative image on GMOs, which are thought of as dangerous and unnatural. Scientists have written about their researches, however, the complex language of scientists was not understood by the public. The miscommunication between the two shows the causality tenet of the Strong Programme of Scientific Knowledge, which is concerned about the state of knowledge. The public perception and scientific view about the risks of GMOs has resulted in a communication problem.
Genetically modified organisms are alive and present in our society.
They have taken control of the crops and foods that consumers show great concern in this issue of biotechnology in foods. Thus, these GMOs should be taken with precautions and avoiding unintended harm to the environment and human health. Although there may be some benefits to GMOs, we should always be safe when assessing GM foods so that no one would be affected. Consumers argue that they should have the right to labelling in foods, however, there are already laws and regulations that exist that are able to maintain production and assess any risks in genetically engineered foods. The principle of reflexivity would be applied to the regulation of labelling. Individuals with low reflectivity would result in being shaped by society and following the public perceptions on the negative thoughts on GMOs. However, individuals with high reflectivity would shape their own norms and desires through the continuous production of GM foods as being safe to consume and to the human health. Through research, it can be seen that GMO foods are controversial and have ongoing debates in biotechnology, but these controversies are still unanswered and continue to take on many
perceptions.