Ms. Ankur Jain
Research scholar, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi
E mail: rukna_niaj@yahoo.com
Phone: +91- 9873431091
Abstract
Purpose – This paper seeks to examine employees’ perceptions of business excellence or High Performance Work System (HPWS) and its relationship with TQM/HRM practices within software industry in India. Despite extensive research on TQM/HRM practices and HPWS, none examines this scope of investigative study. Therefore, the proposed model was developed with the intention of examining this relationship.
Design/methodology/approach – Original research using self-completed questionnaires, distributed to employees of software industry, is thoroughly reported. The study sample consisted of 324 employees, resulting in a response rate of 81 percent. A questionnaire was developed and administered to ascertain the level of influence by TQM/HRM practices on HPWS. Data were analyzed by employing correlation.
Findings – The results revealed that HRM, organization culture, quality of work life, empowerment are high involvement TQM/HRM practices which are positively associated with employees perceptual outcomes and process quality management, benchmarking and others are low involvement TQM/HRM practices which are required for the cost efficiencies and operative outcomes of HPWS. Further, the result of the analysis supports the proposed model based on the empirically validated TQM/HRM instruments, which are reliable and valid.
Originality/value – The findings make a significant contribution by using software industry that proves to be useful as an example of a methodology that might be used to track the extent of TQM/HRM effects on HPWS. An organization could use this instrument to do a pre-test baseline measurement, and then periodically re-administer it to identify changes associated with TQM/HRM efforts.
Keywords- Total quality management, Human Resource Management, High
References: 1. Ahmed, N. U. 2001. Incorporating environmental concerns into TQM. Production and Inventory Management Journal 1: 25-29. 2. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. and Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off, Ithaca: ILR Press. 3. Arthur J.B. (1994) 'Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover ', Academy of Management Journal, 3(37): 670-87. 4. Bahrami, H., and S. Evans. 1997. Human resource leadership in knowledge based entities: Shaping the context of work. Human Resource Management 36: 23-28. 5. Barclay, D., Higgins, C. and Thompson, R. (1995), “The partial least square (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration”, Technology Studies, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 285-309. 6. Batt, R. (2002). ‘Managing customer services: human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth’. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 587–597. 7. Blackburn R. and Rosen B. (1993) 'Total Quality and Human Resources Management: Lessons learned from Baldrige Award winning companies ', Academy of Management Executive, 3(7): 43-65. 10. Boxall, P., Macky, K. and Rasmussen, E. (2003). ‘Labour turnover and retention in New Zealand: the causes and consequences of leaving and staying with employers’. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 41: 195–214. 11. Cortada, J. W. 1995. TQM for information system management: Quality practices for continuous improvement. New York: McGraw-Hill. 12. Dale B.G. (1999) Managing Quality, 3rd edition, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford. 13. Delery, J.E. and Shaw, J.D. (forthcoming in 2002) 'The Strategic Management of People in Work Organizations: review, synthesis, and extension ', Vol. 20, Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, edited by Ferris. 14. Goyal, S. K., and M. Islam. 2001. Total quality management through activity-based costing and cultural setting—A versatile tool. Industrial Engineering 30: 9-12. 15. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 16. Issac, Rajendran, and Anantharaman, Significance of Quality Certification: The Case of the Software Industry in India, QMJ VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2004, ASQ 17 18. Lewin, D. (2004). HRM and Business Performance Research: Empiricism in Search of Theory. Paper presented to the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO, 2002, revised. 21. Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 22. Ooi, and et.al., Does TQM influence employees’ job satisfaction? An empirical case analysis, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 24 No. 1, 2007, pp. 62-77 23 24. Pfeffer J. (1994) Competitive Advantage Through People. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 25. Puay S.H., Tan K.C., Xie M. and Goh T.N. (1998) 'A comparative study of nine national quality awards ', The TQM Magazine, 1(10): 30-9. 26. Radovilsky, Z. D., and J. W. Gotcher. 1996. Implementing total quality management: Statistical analysis of survey results. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 12: 10-22. 27. Tenner, A. R. 1991. Quality management beyond manufacturing. Research Technology Management 34: 27-32. 28. Zinovy, D., J. Radovisky, W. Gotcher, and S. Slattsveen. 1996. Implementing total quality management-statistical analysis of survey results. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 13: 10-22.