Preview

CRISPR, A Genetic Engineering Tool: Article Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
151 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
CRISPR, A Genetic Engineering Tool: Article Analysis
This article is an opinion piece about why CRISPR, a genetic engineering tool, will be good for society. Due to it being an opinion piece, only one side of the argument, the ‘pro’ side, is really expanded upon. The only real mention of the ‘con’ side is when the author rebuts the proposed safety issue.
Some examples of absolute or extreme language include “There should no longer be any doubt on that score,” and “The new gene-editing techniques appear to be very accurate.” An example of numbers and stats is “Our genes set the pattern for many aspects of our lives.”
I was surprised when the author said that CRISPR is already being used on insects and embryos. The author assumed that I already knew what eugenics were. I thought that genetic engineering

Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did The Colonials Win The Revolutionary War
    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page

    Why Did The Colonials Win The Revolutionary War

    The Revolutionary War was not a war that was fought just to show the British what the colonials were capable of. It was fought to earn our independence and freedom from the unfair British rule. We knew that we did not want to live like that anymore, so we fought as hard and strategically as we could and in the end won the war and our independence. There are three main reasons why the Colonials won the Revolutionary War. The first reason is that leading up to the war, we boycotted all kinds of British goods to show them that we still held some form of power while under their control and would not stand to be taxed unfairly.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Limiting Science: a Summary
    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Limiting Science: a Summary

    David Baltimore’s written work of Limiting Science: A Biologist’s Perspective discusses the controversy of research in molecular biology and its limitless freedom, disputing there should be freedom in which direction science heads, but the public should decide the pace at which it goes. Baltimore first begins his argument with the discussion of how molecular biology began. It was born from individual sciences where attempts at trying to solve the mysteries in these fields led to the realization that the answers lied in genetics. Advances in the field are what really are at the heart of this discussion though. The most critical one is the development of recombinant DNA where DNA can be multiplied for an indefinite period, but the potential of this process has scared some scientists, even Baltimore himself, about unforeseen events. This led to even more unsettling questions that inevitably hurt the field of genetics, which Baltimore goes on to explain that the dangers have been blown out of proportion. The most common subject that comes to discussion through these fears is genetic engineering. Baltimore delves into the two techniques for altering imperfect genes, and then raises two questions that normally pop up. Who gets to decide what genes get altered and how will they decide it will be done? For Baltimore this presents a dilemma of both ethics and morals and thus presents the real problem at heart. To clarify the argument against recombinant DNA research Baltimore presents to the reader similar arguments. After he gives us the danger of actively researching genetic engineering, Baltimore flips the coin and argues the danger of restricting it. His theory is that the criterion used to decide how science should be handled reflects a dominant principle of governing. This should not be allowed to control scientific advances nor should science be the servant to this ideology, mainly because of the repercussions on society it could…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Specter And Gawande
    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Specter And Gawande

    If the people who purchase and read The New Yorker were truly uninterested by articles that do not contain the presence of an individual, the editors and the executives of the company would not have published Gawande’s essay in it 88 years after the first issue debuted. The final topic both Specter and Gawande touch upon is public policy. Specter writes about public policies which do not exist yet but are on the verge of existing. As CRISPR becomes more precise, human testing is becoming a reality and with this reality comes policies that need to be enacted to ensure the safety of society. Whereas Gawande is questioning why indivuals don’t follow public policies enacted to ensure the safety of society. Even with public policies, society cannot be deemed safe from dangers associated with gene rewriting unless every person follows the them. Researchers and law makers must first know why people do not follow policies to ensure they are creating policies that will be follow. Specter and Gawande speak to each topic, science, journalism and public policy in their own way but each is also interconnected by the fact that they both share the…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Questions on the Ethicality of Using Genetic Screening as a Tool in Conception
    • 2479 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Questions on the Ethicality of Using Genetic Screening as a Tool in Conception

    2. Issues in Science and Technology Fall 2012, v29 i1, p77(11), This article is basically written to examine the ethical issues in genetic…

    • 2479 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Taking A Look At Duck Island
    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Taking A Look At Duck Island

    During the late 30s and early 40s Duck Island was the place to go to hang out and forget about it all. A place full of nature and fun but it had a very unexpected twist hidden in the bushes. November 8, 1938, Vincenzo Tonzillo, 20, and Mary Myatovich 15, became the first victims of the phantom. Another couple down the walk heard the screams and found Tonzillo dead in a pool of blood, by their car. Myatovich however, was still inside the car as if she was planted there, bloody but somehow still alive.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Genetic Modification
    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Genetic Modification

    Genetic modification is becoming closer and closer to an everyday possibility. With this possibility comes a whirlwind of possible effects, both positive and negative. There has been a history of opposition towards these technologies, oftentimes because of fear that the capabilities would be abused. However, the potential that newborns could be born free of hereditary diseases outweighs the fear of “designer babies”.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Nature, Nurture and Psychopathy : A Criticism on the Genetics of Psychopathy
    • 6712 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Nature, Nurture and Psychopathy : A Criticism on the Genetics of Psychopathy

    The pseudo-science of eugenics coined by Darwin’s own cousin, Francis Galton advocated ‘selective breeding’. This developed over a few decades into mass involuntary sterilizations of whole ethnic groups over a…

    • 6712 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Human Genetic Engineering
    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Human Genetic Engineering

    Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Technology Has Changed American Agriculture
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Technology Has Changed American Agriculture

    Analyze the ways in which technology, government policy, and economic conditions changed American agriculture in the period of 1865-1900. in your answer, evaluate farmers’ response.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Against Designer Babies
    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Argument Against Designer Babies

    Modifying genes could be a way of preventing unwanted traits or enhance characteristics (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). Unfortunately, CRISPR is a first generation tool, so there is no possibility no damage will be done to the baby. As well as no security, the baby will not have any life-threatening defects, as it is known that “curing” one disease causes another. In fact, this will create a bad relationship between parents and children (The Ethnic of ‘Designer Babies’, Tia Ghose), since the children have no choice in being modified. Using babies to alter their characteristics is using them as science experiments since there are over one hundred genes that account for each trait and fifty genes account for three percent of one gene (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). With many parents willing to allow these experimentations to occur on their baby, it will come at a huge…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering
    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering

    Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    CRISPR-Cas9 Synthesis
    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CRISPR-Cas9 Synthesis

    CRISPR-Cas9 is a method of gene editing that provides researchers with a way of precisely targeting a specific string of DNA. CRISPR is a sequence of repeated DNA located in the genomes of bacteria that are used in immune systems to help protect our bodies from infecting viruses. This method involves the use of an enzyme known as Cas9 and a guide RNA. A virus’s DNA becomes spacers in the CRISPR sequence when the new virus infects the bacterium. This sequence will then begin the process of transcription in which it will become a guide RNA. This RNA will then be used to guide the Cas9 to locate the target sequence within the viral genome, so that the Cas9 can snip off this sequence and kill the virus. Simply put, it’s like using scissors…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Gene Therapy a Form of Eugenics
    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is Gene Therapy a Form of Eugenics

    In his article Is Gene Therapy a Form of Eugenics, John Harris discusses the concept of Eugenics when it comes to using Gene Therapy. Harris defines Eugenics as adapting to the production of “fine” offspring, or artificially producing offspring to fit certain criteria. He stresses on how this concept should be achieved. His main argument is that we should be in favor of Eugenics when it comes to potentially saving a child from living a potential disabled life. Harris believes that his view is not wrong, but believes that it is a matter of indifference whether we call it Eugenics or not. Harris argues that Gene Therapy is ethically sound, and using Eugenics can save lives. Harris notes problems when discussing the idea of using Eugenics. First, he notes that we do not fully understand the objective of producing “fine children.” Second, we do not understand the definition of “fine” and notes the difference between what an offspring can be, and what an offspring normally is. He poses a question where he argues what the difference between removing and repairing dysfunctions is, compared to using measures to enhance the functions of a potential offspring (Eugenics) He poses a second question where he asks if Gene Therapy in general is morally acceptable.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Human Gene Therapy
    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Human Gene Therapy

    Despite rapid scientific progress, many people of the public feel somewhat excluded from the debate surrounding the application of science in new technologies and products. Moreover, as scientific progress becomes increasingly fundamental to society, it is becoming equally difficult to stop it from clashing with long-held ethical values. One common and long standing debate is gene therapy. In 2005, a public survey was conducted to see people’s attitudes towards human gene therapy and while 82% stated that they would accept somatic therapy for major illnesses like heart disease, only 64% supported…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Genetic Engineering
    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Genetic Engineering

    What can we say about genetic engineering? Most of us fear for the worse and do not know how it works, while others think it will make our future brighter . With the way genetic engineering is changing, people could look out their window in future years and see woolly mammoths roaming freely. Genetic engineering is a process that is performed to add DNA to an animal, human,or plant. The reason being to give an organism attributes and characteristics that it does not already have (Higley). Genetic engineering should only be used for the treatment of serious diseases. It should never be used to alter or improve animals.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics