Preview

Capital Punishment and Torture: Unconstitutional or Junstice?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
532 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment and Torture: Unconstitutional or Junstice?
Capital punishment and torture are often looked down on in today's societies because they are viewed as cruel and unconstitutional, but perhaps they would help in more ways then we would like to admit. They can be beneficial in many ways such as encouragement to be truthful, encouragement to live by the laws, and as a source of punishment. Capital punishment and torture are thought to be too painful, and the person doing the punishment is also committing a crime.
<br>
<br>Many people agree with capital punishment and torturing. Capital punishment can be used as a threat, if broken, it will be a promise. Also knowing that there is the possibility of a death sentence gives people the incentive not to commit a crime.Torture is also a very helpful method of punishment. This works in many countries such as Singapore. In Singapore, many people are caned because of doing things that we may just get a warning for doing. Do you actually see the same person committing a crime twice? No, because everyone in Singapore is sure they will be caned if the crime is committed again. "It is generally assumed that torture is impermissible, a throwback to a more brutal age" (Levin 92). Capital punishment is said to be unconstitutional because people are not the one's to make the choice of life or death; God is. Many people say that torture takes mankind back in civility when people need to be growing intellectually. Perhaps it does set us back to the middle age when people savagely cut off people's hands for steeling and tongues for lying. Today's society needs to concentrate on developing new ways to get along and live in peace with one another. Everyone knows that in today's society peace in greatly needed .
<br>
<br>If a terrorist was to have an atomic bomb in Manhattan Island that is set to detonate at noon on July 4th unless his requests are met, would you resort to torture? What if he was caught at 10am on the day the bomb will detonate? Since he is caught he prefers death

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If torture is used in retaliation and as an “eye to eye” concept, then torture would be an unethical way of punishing someone (Guidebook). For this example, I would argue that torture is being used to provide the members with the realization for their actions, so torture is an unethical way of punishment. Also, torture is not a replacement for the death penalty, so it is not saving an individual’s life because in the guidebook it states that if “torture is vengeful and not being used to protect innocent lives, then it is not technically a moral reason for punishing someone” (Guidebook). Without protecting innocent lives, torture cannot be considered an ethical reason for punishing someone, so I would argue that the type of punishment that should be used is an elongated amount of jail time. Incarceration meets all the requirements for being a moral type of punishment because it doesn't cause mental harm that torture would and incarcerating the members would not be a retaliating…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Everybody believes that capital punishment is wrong, but when they look at certain cases, they are quick to say, “Put them to death”, or “scream capital punishment.”” Jeff Lindsay. Capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as a punishment for a crime. It has been around since time itself. In the 1700’s, The Code of Hammurabi was the first known written document there were twenty-five crimes that were punishable by death such as adultery, and helping slaves escape. Only the most heinous of those warranted such a stringent sentence. And while there are many methods that may take a prisoner's life, there are also alternatives. One must ask though, “Do those options do justice to the unspeakable acts these criminals have…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He asserts that any means should be utilized on a terrorist, who is caught during an extreme situation, such as a bomb threat, since there is a limitation on time and information is needed to protect as many civilians as possible. Krauthammer refers to this as a “ticking time bomb” exception. This is further followed by the “slower-fuse high-value terrorist” circumstance in which an influential terrorist should be tortured as well because her/his information can be utilized to plan for future attacks and tactically protect the lives of numerous people. To support this exception, Krauthammer refers to the detainment and water boarding of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, a member of al Qaeda, by American operatives in order to extract information about plans and cell locations. Clearly, this intelligence would not be obtained by abiding to McCain’s…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the death penalty is a form of revenge which is an outdated method for justice in our society today. Using this method of an eye for an eye type of punishment is the inhumanely killing of a person. As said by Ghandi, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" meaning revenge or retribution is not the answer you should seek when punishing someone. This form of punishment has been used since ancient times and is so severe that it can not be reversed. The permanence of this punishment is unsparing and does not give the person any chances to be rehabilitated or try to be integrated back into society. The very worst means of torture or disciplinary action is to take a person’s life. The whole purpose of our justice system is to impede criminals from committing crime by the means of punishment that…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terroristic torture cannot satisfy the constraint of possible compliance because its purpose, intimidation of persons other than the victim of the torture, cannot be accomplished and may not even be capable of being influenced by the victim of the torture.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Advocates of torture argue that torture is a necessary tool especially in time sensitive scenarios, like if an individual is the only person alive who knows the whereabouts of a bomb that is set to detonate, resulting in the deaths of hundreds. I could not even imagine how stressful the interview process of this scenario would be, as time progresses and no results are being produced, inflicting pain does not only have the possibility of yielding results but it would also be a convenient way to externalize your frustrations.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a punishment that results in death usually caused by capital crimes or capital offenses. It is commonly referred to as the death sentence. According to an article “Buzzle” not all countries accept capital punishment but there are still a lot of states who do (par.1). Capital punishment has been around for thousands of years, this punishment is said to have helped keep crime level down and alter the minds of future criminals to prevent them from committing atrocious crimes such as: murder, terrorism, and in some situations aggravated kidnapping.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the threat of national security, the debate on torture is confronted with legal and moral dilemmas of permissibility. In the hypothetical case of the ticking-bomb terrorist, torture is perceived as either an advantageous means of national security, or a violation of human rights. Although it is a “slippery slope,” in order to preserve the balance between national security and civil liberties in a democratic society, torture should be prohibited.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment is currently one of the most, if not the most, severe consequence for criminals. However this form of punishment is only used for the most serious crimes such as murder, rape or homicide. Due to this the crime rates of murder, rape and homicide are drastically less in countries that still use the death penalty. Therefore capital punishment can help make the UK free, to some extent, from such detestable crimes.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that torture, in some specific situations, could be a useful means of getting information. However, in the majority of cases I feel that torture is unjust and only leads to false information. Torture is a practice that has been shown to be an inhumane barbaric practice that rarely even works. I feel like if we used these tactics to get information we would just be hurting our reputation more as a country and possibly even open ourselves up to more attacks because of unjust torture tactics. The main thing wrong with torture is it just doesn't work. People who are being tortured will say just about anything to make it stop, that includes providing false information, which will just lead to more confusion and also gives the person being…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Torture Morally Wrong

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Torture can be defined as mental or physical harm to any human being. Whether to torture an enemy or any individual including the ethics of it is a very problematic topic to this day. After the attack on Paris it became even more controversial and the remaining question is whether using torture to obtain information to save lives outweighed the ethical and moral obligations. Human rights become involved, including the ramifications it could have.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Americans, as a nation founded on the basis of fundamental human rights, and equality for all, torture is an unacceptable and inexcusable act that degrades us as a nation and as individuals. It debases us and makes us scarcely better than those we condemn. Just as a rose by any other name will smell just as sweet, torture by any other name remains just as deplorable.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It’s safe to say that torture may be one of the worst experiences that can happen to a human being. I know that if I were a situation where my options were being tortured to death or being put to death quickly, I would choose the quick death every time. The issue at hand is whether we should be allowed to torture terrorists for information or not. While most people have probably already formed their own opinion on the matter, it may not be as cut and dry as they first thought once they hear the argument from both sides.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Torture

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The million of innocent lives claimed by acts of terror, have never been acceptable. Terrorist are destroying our nation and we can’t combat it because torture is not an option. We must now choose a side of allowing them american rights or taking advantage of a useful tactic. The tactic (Torture) would ensure we have information in the time frame needed, it has a history of being efficient, and It will save thousands of lives.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays