Preview

Carthage Vs Rome Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
513 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Carthage Vs Rome Research Paper
Carthage vs. Rome Carthage and Rome are very similar in some ways, the origin of both of them are almost lost in the clouds of tradition. Rome and Carthage were both had big ambitions, they wanted to conquer more countries and expand their dominion, to be supreme in Mediterranean. The origin of Cartage was lost, all we knew is that Phoenicians from Tyre settled there, and the territory was acquired from native Africa. The governments in Cartage and Rome were similar outwardly. There were two magistrates in Cartage as two consuls in Rome. There was a council, consisted of elders in Cartage, comparing to senate in Roma. They both had an assembly. Though the appearance was the same, but actually the spirit was very different. In Rome, the power was controlled by their citizens, but in Cartage it was controlled by a small group of wealthy people. So citizens were more loyal to their country, but the …show more content…
The direct cause was the contest between Campanian soldiers and Syracuse. At last Roma defeated Carthage and captured Messana. Then Roma continually conquered several cities. Romans can achieve these successes, because they had a great army, but they didn’t have a naval like Carthage in the sea. Carthage used this advantage to ravage the coast cities which were once controlled by her, and gradually Romans understood that if they wanted to overcome Carthage, they must had a great fleet like their army. So, they started to build their own big fleet, they used the Carthaginian vessel as a model to build their own vessels, and at the same time, they trained their soldiers to sailors on the shore where they built banks. At a very short time they organized a big fleet. Moreover, to use the advantage of their soldiers in hand-to- hand encounter, they provided their ships with drawbridges. Then Romans defeated Carthaginians in the sea and became a naval

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 500 years of no nation has everything stayed the same and Rome is no exception. While the economics of Rome managed to stay the same between 100 and 600 CE, and the laws of Rome with it, government and religion in 600 CE would not be recognizable to leaders and civilians from 100 CE.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 270 Rome had conquered Italy and organised it into a confederation of Roman citizens and Latin and Italian allies. Polybius says that the Romans ‘Once having made themselves masters of Italy applied themselves to the conquest of countries further afield’ . This combined with the fact that the most populated parts of Italy were along the western side where the Dominant power was Carthage made it inevitable that Rome’s first contact in the Mediterranean would be with Carthage.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respective form of government of Rome and Carthage has an "outward similarity" in terms of structure. If Rome has two consuls, Carthage on other hand has two chief magistrates called as suffetes. Carthaginians have also a legislative body such like the Roman Senate which is called the hundreds or "the counsel of thirty Nobles" (Mackay, 1999). In addition, it has also a citizen assembly similar to Rome's comitia (Moray,1901). In governmental organization the two two great nations were parallel to each other, however in terms of the internal affairs of their respective states they were entirely antipodal.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • What was archaic Rome like and how was it shaped by relations with its neighbors?…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Carthage is described in this way because it did not actually directly rule most of the places that were part of its "empire." In a traditional empire, the imperial government has direct control of the various parts of its empire. Rome was like this, with all of its provinces being ruled from Rome. But Carthage was different. The various parts of its empire were mostly independent. They relied on Carthage for defense and did what it said in terms of foreign policy. However, Carthage did not rule them. It traded with them and its wealth made it powerful. Therefore, it was a commercial "empire."…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Causes of 2nd Punic War

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Second Punic war “was the greatest and most dangerous one Rome was compelled to fight on their way to the conquest of the Mediterranean.” With 17 years of battle causing heavy casualties to be suffered on both sides, the Second Punic War has proven to be an important time period in the Roman and Carthaginian empires. For Rome, the end of the war meant “the defection of most Southern Italy” (Kagan 232, 1995) and many economic problems. For Carthage this meant the end of their rise to power, and the realization that the idea of Mediterranean control being based in Africa rather than Europe was no longer a possibility (Kagan 233, 1995). Both empires had a lot at stake upon entering the war, but as will be discussed, many historians believe that eventual conflict was inevitable. Past grievances and battles pitted the Romans and Carthaginians against one another ultimately leading to the Second Punic War and the resulting downfall of Carthage.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 3rd Punic War

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A big turning point was the 3rd Punic War and the End of Carthage. In 509 BC Carthage and Rome signed a friendship treaty. But this friendship would not last forever. There was series of wars fought between Carthage and Rome known as the Punic Wars. Fought between 264-146 BC. Carthage was a city-state on the Greek model that had been founded by Phoenicians. It was the strongest city in the Western Mediterranean by the 3rd century and it became very wealth through trade. Carthaginian merchants went from one end of the Mediterranean to the other, the city's fleets were huge, and its army was one of the best in the ancient world. It was Carthage that pried loose the Greek hold on the western ports, and Carthaginian merchants traded as far north as England and down the West African coast. Unlike Rome, but like the Greeks, the Carthaginians also made extensive use of mercenaries. By the early 200s, Carthage had expanded across North Africa but also had control of the Belearic Islands, Sardinia, Corsica, and much of Sicily. She took the goods from these regions, and her own fertile hinterland, and shipped them to eastern ports. Once Rome had conquered most of Italy, it was only a matter of time before these two ambitious and powerful empires came face to face with one another. Rome was a civilization that grew out of a small agricultural community founded on the Italian Peninsula. As years past Rome began to expand its empire all through out the peninsula. Later on they conquer most of the Italian peninsula. The Romans were very skilled fighters. Their army was fierce. They were stronger on land than on water. They wanted to expand their empire…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Punic Wars

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the ancient Mediterranean world, Rome and Carthage were two of the most powerful societies. Carthage, a city-state founded in the 8th century by the Phoenecians, was located in the western Mediterranean, and had one of the best armies and navies in the ancient world. Originally part of Phoenecia, Carthage became independent after the defeat of the Phoenecians by the Assyrians in the 7th century B.C. Rome, on the other hand, according to popular myth, was founded by Romulus on the Italian peninsula in 753 B.C. Contrary to the Carthaginians, the Romans had “a talent for patient political reasonableness that was unique in the ancient world.” From 264-146 B.C., these two powers raged on in a series of wars, named “the Punic Wars” for the Latin word punicus, meaning “Phoenecian.” Even with the outcomes of the Punic Wars being what they were, their effects on Rome were both positive and negative, ultimately leading to the fall of the Roman Republic.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carthage, on the other hand, is a republic comparable to an oligarchy, (nd). Rome was almost a land-based military; while “Carthage's military system was more well-balanced and appeared to be the most powerful one in this time. Therefore Carthage as power could draw its troops across from the Mediterranean, region that includes Iberia (the actual Spain) and the North Africa.Romans and Carthaginians had different religious beliefs. “Romans worshipped Greek’s God and the Carthaginians worshipped Phoenicians gods.” The article went on to say that “Rome was stronger in land army and Carthage stronger in navy. Rome was a representative government Carthage was a republican government Rome was stronger in Land army Carthage was strong in navy.”…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Punic Wars

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The main reason why Rome and Carthage went to battle during the first Punic war, which occurred from 264 to 241 BC, was to determine the control of the islands of Corsica and Sicily. Before this event, Carthage had apprehended many territories that had made it very easy for them to dominate the western part of the Mediterranean Sea. Nevertheless, when the Carthaginians decided to conquer Messana, which is now called Messina, located near the northeast corner of Sicily, the Romans considered this a threat to their territory and responded with an attack to the Phoenicians , another name for Carthaginians hence the name Punic, forcing them to withdraw from the area.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    When I joined the police department, I knew I wanted to be a part of something great. I wanted to leave a legacy and make an impression on others. I was the first in my family to choose a career in law enforcement, so initially, I was unaware of the challenges this career field came with. My mom was a teacher, and my dad worked in the printing business. Both were successful in their chosen fields, but they were blind to the demands required for a fulfilling career in law enforcement. To be successful, I would need to be observant of those around me who had found success. I would need to mirror their ways and incorporate their habits into my own. I would need to learn from their failures. Most importantly, I would need to learn what made them…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Description of Carthage

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The government of Carthage had been an aristocracy of nobles and wealthy merchants ruling the city to an oligarchical government. Having an oligarchical government meant that the power went from the rich to having on judge and two elected suffels in power. This meant that the people could have more of a say in what’s going on instead of all of the rich snotty people ruling over the poor people in the city. Having this type of system of government had a little more freedom towards the people in Carthage.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This war began as the Romans moved over to Sicily to acquire territory. Between 264 BC and 241 BC is when the first war happened. The first few battles were ashore. With the Battle of Agrigentum, the Carthage armed forces had to learn and adapt. Ultimately, they chose to utilize their naval forces. However, the Romans had manufactured many ships with advancements that aided them in combat and, in consequence, defeated the Carthaginian naval forces. The result of the First Punic War was a resonating victory by the Romans. The Second Punic War was a great deal shorter than the First one, it is most notable for Hannibal, the Carthage pioneer. Hannibal took a multitude of men through the mountains and startled the Romans in Northern Italy. As…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the Celts and Romans switched roles but not personality they would hate the government, and all of the laws and regulations would have made them feel restricted. Most would have wanted to be in the army and only that which would not be possible. They would never have a leader for very long without trying to overthrow him and would succeed at some time in doing so. There would be many civil wars in that civilization. Which is why instead of having a complicated government like the Romans, they were led by those who established themselves as courageous and strong yet successful. It just made sense in their culture for it to be that way. Somehow they thrived living like barbarians and being led the way they were. If they had tried to be like the Romans they could have, and most likely would have failed by infighting and splitting into many different groups and doing things their own way, therefore reestablishing their “barbaric” way of…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Empire was one of the largest empires in history. Rome, with such a prosperous and aggressive military controlled the Mediterranean Sea and the countries around it. Their empire was so big and vast, it had to be controlled and watched by thousands of Roman guards daily. Towards the end of the great empire, it became harder and harder to regulate and maintain the borders. With recent sacks and local uprisings that occurred in and out of Rome’s walls, it became hard to gather enough troops to fight and also defend the borders. Since Rome’s territory was so extensive, it became hard to transport troops quickly and efficiently even though they had effective road systems. As was became more present in Rome, lots of money was used to keep…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays