Preview

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1859 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
Jennifer Proctor
POL201: American National Government
Instructor: Luke Martin
10/29/12

Habeas Corpus has been around for very many years. Although no one knows its exact origin it still dates back pretty far. Habeas Corpus has been seen as a good thing and a bad thing. It has been around for every war we have had. It has also been suspended by two of our presidents in the past. The story and history of Habeas Corpus is a very old one but it is also a very interesting one too.

Habeas corpus, a Latin term meaning "you have the body," an important right granted to individuals in America and refers to the right of every prisoner to challenge the terms of his or her incarceration in court before a judge. Basically it means that a judicial mandate require that a prisoner be brought before the court to determine whether the government has the right to continue detaining them. The individual being held or a person representing them can petition the court for such a writ. The English history of Habeas Corpus is ancient. It clearly dates back to Magna Carta times in 1215, but its actual origin is still uncertain. Habeas Corpus was originally the order of the King and his courts but in the years passed became the right of the person being detained or someone acting on their behalf rather than the king and his courts. There is a quote from Magna Carta that states, ‘’no free man shall be taken or imprisoned or disseized or exiled or in any other way destroyed except by the lawful judgment of their peers or by the law of the land’’. Habeas Corpus was unknown to many civil law systems in Europe. European civil law system generally favored authority from the top down whereas Angelo-Saxon common law tends to favor the individual. The Angelo-Saxon common law comes from England. After the English Civil War and the beheading of King Charles I in 1649 is what led



References: http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/rightsandfreedoms/a/habeuscorpus.htm https://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/jil/jilp/articles/2-1_Stenson_Thomas.pdf http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/jus/humanrights/HUMR5503/h09/undervisningsmateriale/ingrid_detter.pdf http://themoderatevoice.com/26650/channeling-abraham-lincoln-george-bush-their-civil-liberty-power-grabs/ http://www.restore-habeas.org/whip/?q=IA http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history_lesson/2001/11/lincolns_crackdown.html http://habeascorpus.net/hcwrit.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012).…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writ of habeas corpus is when you get arrested and you say “writ of habeas corpus” to be brought to a judge so he could tell you why you’ve been arrested. If there is no reason to be arrested, then, you are free to leave. It was made for people who didn’t even know why they were sent to jail. They just got arrested one day and didn’t know what they did wrong.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” Under this provision, persons detained by the government are entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if…

    • 36699 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas corpus- the principle that no person can be held in prison without being charged with a specific crime…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The framers of the Constitution sought that the writ shall be included in the body of the Constitution in Article I, Section 9, stating that, “The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of Rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” (site) Abraham Lincoln believed and respected the Constitution and the traditional separation of powers, however he did not feel that the framers of the Constitution intended to wait for Congress to come together to make a decision in a time of crisis. President Lincoln did not want to get rid of the writ of Habeas Corpus because prior to becoming the president he had served in congress and was a lawyer himself and therefore he understood it’s meaning and importance. (site) Suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus was not an easy decision made by Lincoln, yet as the commander in Chief of the United States it was his duty to protect the country in these extreme circumstances of protests and…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The term habeas corpus which is Latin for you have the body have reference to the writ of inquiring into the lawfulness of a person who is detained the guardian of an inmate to transport that inmate in front the court and justify the details for his or her incarceration. A court order of habeas corpus is a test to the lawfulness of an inmate custody and does not require an investigation into the inmate’s guiltiness or their innocence. Once the court has finished the details for imprisonment the court the inmate or return the inmate into confinement. The use of the habeas corpus has origins in English communal law dating back to the 14th century and became a part England’s legislative law in 1679. The American colonial courts distributed the writ at common law, and state governments remain to understand the rights of habeas corpus following liberty. In 1807 the Supreme Court acclaimed that the municipal courts could not give habeas corpus to inmates that were being held by the state and or local government because Congress could not grant that kind of power.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus in Latin, means, “You have the body.” According to our text habeas corpus means, “a demand by a court to a jailer to produce the prisoner and announce the charges” (Waldman-Levin, 2012, 5.7). In my opinion for most Americans, habeas corpus protects a prisoner and it also allows a prisoner to indicate that his/her constitution guarantees rights to a fair trial. “From a political point of view, the great value of habeas corpus is that it protects citizens from a dangerous tendency which is generally found in those who exercise the powers of government” (S. G. F., 1888, pg. 454). Habeas corpus is important when it comes to a prisoner questioning why he/she is being held or imprisoned. The Habeas Corpus Act was formed in 1679 and is used to keep an individual from being unlawfully imprisoned.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus is located in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It says, “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) Habeas corpus is Latin for “you should have the body”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) It means that the accused most appear in front of a judge and know the charges haled against him or her.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Habeas Corpus prevented the government from accusing and arresting people for no valid reason and it was unconstitutional for Lincoln to suspend it. The Supreme Court ruled the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus as unconstitutional by saying, "the attention of the country has been called to the proposition that one who is sworn to ‘take care that the laws be faithfully executed,' should not himself violate them." Lincoln argued that he had a right to suspend the writ of habeas corpus because " the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, shall not be suspended unless when, in the cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it." What better crisis is there then a time of war, and because Lincoln never accepted the states' secession, he viewed the war as an act of rebellion. By viewing the war as an act of rebellion, Lincoln was well within the right of the constitution to suspend the writ of habeas corpus.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus also known as the “great writ of liberty” guarantees that a person who is being held unjustly can go free (Habeas corpus, 2011). This is one of the reasons that make America so great because anyone who is detained can know the reason why they are being held and in so are allowed due process under the law. The Constitution protects the…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Bill of Rights guarantees that everyone has the right to due process. The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark case Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) changed our due process by adding additional procedures to how law enforcement handles a suspect and ensuring they know their rights as American citizens.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus is considered to be one of the most fundamental guarantees of personal liberty we have enjoyed as a country since the inception of our Constitution. However, questions have arisen regarding the proper use of habeas corpus and have been brought into focus in the past decade. In the years since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, hundreds of people have been detained by the United States government as part of its war on terror. Most of these detainees face indefinite detention and have neither been charged with a crime nor afforded prisoner of war status. Habeas corpus serves to protect citizens against arbitrary arrest, torture, and extrajudicial killings and is a fundamental personal liberty guaranteed by our Constitution and cannot be suspended based on that fact.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Habeas Corpus is an ancient common law prerogative writ - a legal procedure to which you have an undeniable right.” (Robertson, 2002). It comes from the Anglo-Saxon common law origin. The Precise of the origin is still unknown, but it still has been used. “Although practice surrounding the writ has evolved over time, Habeas Corpus has since the earliest times been employed to compel the appearance of a person who is in custody to be brought before a court.” (Robertson, 2002). The British colony brought habeas corpus from England and has been used in the United States since the American Revolutionary War. Habeas corpus is found in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It states that “the Habeas Corpus should not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”(Neuman,…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The term habeas corpus was first used in England in the 14th century, but didn’t become official until the 1679 Habeas Corpus Act was passed in Great Britain. Prior to the Revolutionary War, British soldiers were holding colonist without allowing them to exercise their right of habeas corpus. This was one reason that sparked the Revolutionary War. As a result, the founding fathers of America added habeas corpus to The Constitution of the United States, saying that "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it" (Article 1, Section 9) (The Columbia Encyclopedia. 2011, p.1). To this day, citizens that have been charged with a crime enjoy the right of habeas corpus, usually in federal appeals. Habeas Corpus protects the civil liberty of citizens, as it assures them a chance to be heard by the highest court in the land. In contemporary America, as it relates to the war on terror, habeas corpus has been suspended in some cases, especially…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War in Terror

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The writ of Habeas corpus is established for any prisoner that is brought before a judge. The writ justifies the defendant to stand trial. If the defendant denied the trial however, the judge will dismiss the trial. Under the US constitutional law the American celebrates the Habeas corpus liberties under a safe guard to give all terrors a chance to attend their trial. Since, June 2004 and 2008 the Habeas corpus has being change because of matter of the trail and historical interest which lead to the Supreme Court to decide about the trial. Habeas case can interact with three interconnected and they are judicial jurisdiction, ordering their release such as ended the trail if the terror that does not show up for their case, and to see if the terrors are enemy combatant of the United States as when terrors attacks the United States. The noncitizen should hold their trial in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba were the Habeas corpus plays a role in which gives them the authority to stand trial. When congress tried to interfere with the Habeas corpus this is when Boumediene step in and let people know congress interfere with the Suspension Clause of Article 1. Therefore, in the United States the Habeas corpus cannot be suspended unless it invasion the public safety.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays