Preview

Clausewitz in the 21st Century

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5206 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clausewitz in the 21st Century
Clausewitz lived in a time where battles were fought in columns and lines, with soldiers using muskets and solid-shot cannon; when states were the exclusive actors in war; when technological change occurred over decades, if not centuries. What relevance could his work therefore have for the strategic problems of the 21st century?

Introduction Clausewitz was not a cookbook writer. He was not looking for hard and fast rules for conducting war, which he eschews. Indeed, Clausewitzian theories elaborated at different periods of time are in close conjunction with the prevalent political, strategic, and military context, which is completely consonant with Clausewitz’s original conception of his own work:

‘Theory should be study, not doctrine […] It is an analytical investigation leading to a close acquaintance with the subject; applied to experience – in our case, to military history – it leads to thorough familiarity with it. The closer it comes to that goal, the more it proceeds from the objective form of a science to a subjective form of a skill, the more effective it will prove in areas where the nature of the case admits no arbiter but talent.’

‘Theory is meant to educate the mind of the future commander, or, more accurately, to guide him in his self-education, not to accompany him to the battlefield.’

If ‘the absurd difference between theory and practice’ is to be ended, then the correspondence between theory and practice implies the correspondence between the military commander and military thinker. Therefore, ‘self-education’ is important and useful to the military thinker too. He must not be bounded by a single theory of war but with the means to develop his own ideas (objective knowledge of war), fuelled by his talent (subjective capacity and application).
The phenomena of war are more diverse than ever: from terrorism to inter-state war, from information war to riots in rural areas, from air strikes to intifada. Loose networks of limited wars



Bibliography: 1. Andreas, H.-R. (2009). Clausewitz and a New Containment. In S. Hew, & H.-R. Andreas (Eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 283-307). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 2. Andreas, H.-R., & Antulio , E. (2007, December 27). Clausewitz in the Twenty First-Century: Primacy of Policy and a New Containment. From World Security Network: http://www.worldsecuritynetwork.com/showArticle3.cfm?article_id=14985 3 4. Antulio, E. I. (2003). Globalization and the Clausewitzian Nature of War. The European Legacy, 8/3, pp. 317-32. 5. Clausewitz, C. v. (1976). On War. In H. Michael, P. Peter, H. Michael, & P. Peter (Eds.). New Jersey: Princeton. 6. Durieux, B. (2009). Clausewitz and the Two Temptations of Modern Strategic Thinking. In S. Hew, & H. Andreas (Eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 251- 265). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 7. Hammes, T. (2012, Spring). Offshore Control: A Proposed Strategy. Infinity Journal, 2(2), pp. 10-14. 8. Hew, S., & Andreas, H.-R. (2009). Introduction. In S. Hew, & H.-R. Andreas (Eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 1-13). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 9. Antulio, E. (2009). Clausewitz and the Nature of the War on Terror. In S. Hew, & H.-R. Andreas (Eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 196-218). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 10. Ken, B., & R., T. (1999). Strategic Cultures in the Asia-Pacific Region. London. 11. Metz, S. (1994). Clausewitz Homepage. From A Wake for Clausewitz: Toward a Philosophy of 21st-Century Warfare: http://www.clausewitz.com/readings/Metz.htm 12 [ 2 ]. Carl von Clausewitz, On War, trans. and ed. Michael Howard and Peter Parat (Princeton, NJ, 1976), II, 2, p. 141. [ 5 ]. Ken, B., & R., T. (1999). Strategic Cultures in the Asia-Pacific Region. London. [ 6 ]. Durieux, B. (2009). Clausewitz and the Two Temptations of Modern Strategic Thinking. In S. Hew, & H. Andreas (Eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 251- 265). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. [ 10 ]. Hew, S., & Andreas, H.-R. (2009). Introduction. In S. Hew, & H.-R. Andreas (Eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 1-13). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. [ 11 ]. Vom Kriege, ed. Werner Hahlweg (19th edn, Bonn, 1980), 1, 1, §28, pp. 212-213. [ 25 ]. Andreas, H.-R. (2009). Clausewitz and a New Containment. In S. Hew, & H.-R. Andreas (Eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 283-307). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. [ 31 ]. Antulio, E. I. (2003). Globalization and the Clausewitzian Nature of War. The European Legacy, 8/3, pp. 317-32. [ 32 ]. Ernst Otto Czempiel, Weltpolitik im Umbruch. Die Pax Americana, der Terrorisinus und die Zukunft der interuationalen Bezh. 'hungen (Munchen, 2002). [ 33 ]. Andreas, H.-R. (2009). Clausewitz and a New Containment. In S. Hew, & H.-R. Andreas (Eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 283-307). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. [ 34 ]. Antulio, E. (2009). Clausewitz and the Nature of the War on Terror. In S. Hew, & H.-R. Andreas (Eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 196-218). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. [ 35 ]. Hammes, T. (2012, Spring). Offshore Control: A Proposed Strategy. Infinity Journal, 2(2), pp. 10-14.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He also uses Carl von Clausewitz book, On War because, “This study offers an alternative understanding to Weigley's, one based on the proposition that war focused on noncombatant populations is itself a fundamental part of Americans' military past, indeed, is Americans' first way of…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    TITLE MAJ Evette Barnes, SG6A, AY 2017-18 November 2017, H100 Question: How does Clausewitz's paradoxical trinity explain the changes to the character of warfare from the methods used by Frederick the Great to those that followed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? Carl von Clausewitz defines the nature of war by identifying that which remains constant in all wars using his highly regarded paradoxical trinity ; meanwhile, he acknowledges war has, and will continue to change as the characteristics of warfare change but that the three aspects of the trinity (simplified as government, army, and people ) are constantly at play. It is the variables within the compelling relationships between: instruments…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way in which Clausewitz and Jomini essentially maintain the same principles of war but only differ in what they consider significant such as the idea of movements of armies, the significance of politics and total war principles. Jomini throughout his art of war has shown the importance of planning and strategic movement yet Clausewitz recognizes the significance of other factors of war that are hard to quantify, such as the fog of war, the politics involved in war and the need to be barbarous in…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Between Dignity and Despair, a book written by Marion A. Kaplan, published in 1998, gives us a portrait of Jewish life in Nazi Germany by the astounding memoirs, diaries, interviews with survivors, and letters of Jewish women and men. The book is written in chronological order of events, from the daily life of German Jewish families prior to when the Holocaust began to the days when rights were completely taken away; from the beginning of forced labor and exile to the repercussion of the war. Kaplan tries to include details from each significant event during the time of the Holocaust. Kaplan tells us the story of Jews in Germany not from the perception of the Holocaust, but by focusing on the persecutors from the confused and vague viewpoint of Jews trying to direct their lives on a day to day basis in a world that was becoming more and more insane. Kaplan shows us that the Holocaust was impossible to predict exactly because Nazi oppression occurred in random and impulsive steps until the massive violence of November 1938. Between Dignity and Despair focuses on the destiny of families and mostly women’s experience, taking the reader into neighborhoods, kitchens, shops, schools and it gives us form and consistency. It is giving us the exact impression of what life was like to be a Jew in Nazi Germany, except we are sitting behind the book taking it all in.…

    • 2244 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Holocaust: Buchenwald

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages

    <br><li>Meltzer, Milton. Never to Forget the Jews of the Holocaust. New York: Harper & Row, 1976…

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clausewitz understood that “so-called mathematical factors never find a firm basis in military calculations. From the very start there is an interplay of possibilities, probabilities, good luck and bad that weaves its way throughout the length of the tapestry,” meaning nothing in war is ever certain and, therefore, one’s strategy can never be certain. Likewise, Sun Tzu acknowledged, “in war there may be one hundred changes in each step.” The strategy involved in winning a war must change constantly because one must manage the variables in one’s own strategy and, simultaneously, one must attempt to affect the enemy’s strategy. According to Sun Tzu, war is non-rational because you are in constant exchange with an enemy, “as water shapes its flow in accordance with the ground, so an army manages its victory in accordance with the situation of the enemy. And as water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions.” Clausewitz als believed war is non-rational because of human nature, “in a world dominated so much by chance- courage, daring, boldness, and trust in one’s luck are essential qualities for a great commander.” These two ideals go hand-in-hand with one another. When fighting a war, one must constantly react to the enemy’s efforts, which are unpredictable because the enemy is human and reacting to one’s own decisions. This continual interchange creates a non-rational environment full…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Zinn, Howard. Passionate Declarations: Essays on War and Justice. New York: HarperCollins, 2003. Print.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political Policy Holocaust

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This paper was researched in order to discover to what extent German political policy, and anti-Semitism affected the Holocaust. This topic was chosen because the Holocaust may be a very interesting and quite controversial topic for many people. Various books and articles, such as The Holocaust, by Mitchell G. Bard, as well as A History of the Holocaust, by Yehuda Baur were used in order to gather information and learn about this topic to the fullest extent. These sources were helpful in answering the research question and further explaining important facts and events that occurred during this time period. The website entitled Noodletools aided me in organizing the research. Subtopics were created in order to keep the…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper starts with the reaction of American gentiles and Jews to the Holocaust while the slaughtering was going on. In spite of the fact that it is concerned generally with how the Holocaust was discussed following 1945, the wartime years are the proper beginning stage. They were the purpose of takeoff for ensuing confining and speaking to, focusing or underestimating, and utilizing for different purposes the story of the obliteration of European Jewry.…

    • 3428 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Walzer argues against the realist view stating that war does fall under the aegis of morality rather than not. He states in his view that it is possible to fight a morally justified war and it is possible to fight it morally well. He uncovers the truth behind his view in a threefold argument which includes the melian dialogue, an analogy between strategy and morality, and a comparison on historical relativism. By uncovering his threefold argument, Walzer makes it very clear the morality is still involved in war and with this I agree.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    German sociologist Max Weber wrote of the Great War, “this war, with all its ghastliness, is nevertheless grand and wonderful. It is worth experiencing” (EP 768). Embellishing the heroism of warfare, Weber reflects a common acceptance of war in the early twentieth century as one of sport and necessity. However, with the development of nuclear arms came a paradigm shift concerning war and its role amid international powers. Acknowledging the destructive potential of nuclear warfare, Kennedy adamantly stated, “We were not going to misjudge or challenge the other side needlessly, or precipitously push our adversaries into a course of action that was not intended” (75). Using historical precedent as his guide, President Kennedy acts upon the belief that war is rarely intentional, while also recognizing the evolving dynamic of war as one of an arms struggle.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atrocious ordeals the Jewish people faced by Hitler’s anti-semitic Nazis including the mass genocide of over six million jews from 1941-1945, is known today as the Holocaust. Because of this, harsh ghettos and cruel concentration camps became the home to Jews and other individuals during the time of World War ll, and they were later liberated after the surrender of Germany. Justice has not been served for Jews and other victims of the Holocaust due to the results of the decisions for the consequences for the axis powers including the results of the Nuremberg Trials and the postwar life of Holocaust victims. The events that occurred post-war exhibited the difference between freedom and justification, and by comparing the adversities of the…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays